TT Lossbeater/TT Cup
TT CupMatch #13059789
Played Sep 1Finished
Patrik Sturma
Home
No price at publish
Won last 3Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 3
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
311711911––––
Jiri Matus
Away
No price at publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 16:43 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeJiri Matus to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
52 points played in total.
Set by set
311711911––––
H2H Patrik Sturma 16–20 Jiri Matus Patrik Sturma has won 16 of their 36 meetings.
Last 10 · 5–5Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 16:43What took a side1 for · 3 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
16-20 in 36
Matus
Correct
gap of 4 in 36, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Sturma 1396 vs Matus 1330
Sturma
Wrong
both rated, 66 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Sturma 80% vs Matus 60%
Sturma
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Sturma 70% vs Matus 60%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Sturma +3 · Matus -1
Sturma
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Matus)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
TT Cup · #13059789
Sturma
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Matus
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeSturma5wins
AwayMatus5wins
2 of 10 to a deciderLevel at 5–5, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeSturma66.7%4 of 6
AwayMatus75%3 of 4
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Sturma6Matus4n = 10Sturma took 6 of 10
S2Sturma6Matus4n = 10Sturma took 6 of 10
S3Sturma5Matus5n = 10split evenly
S4Sturma3Matus5n = 8Matus took 5 of 8
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home220%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away440%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricSturmaMatusS − MBasisWins550in 10 meetingsFirst set64+2of 10Avg pointsper match38.837.7+1.1per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricSturmaMatusBasisWin rate · lifetime401 / 823 vs 209 / 40548.7%51.6%401 / 823 vs 209 / 405Avg sets wonper match2.12.1per matchAvg pointsper match39.539.0per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
MatusRead onlywould have hit
What we said
54%
Matus · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Matus won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WJul 28 · 18:40P. Sturma—11811113J. Matus—511981
LJul 27 · 14:40P. Sturma—1151181J. Matus—51113113
WJul 22 · 12:15P. Sturma—1111113J. Matus—9780
LJul 7 · 10:45P. Sturma—811871J. Matus—11711113
LJun 25 · 13:45P. Sturma—111110832J. Matus—591211113
WJun 22 · 18:10P. Sturma—11711113J. Matus—511571
LJun 22 · 15:10P. Sturma—1118141J. Matus—11711163
LJun 8 · 20:40P. Sturma—1011881J. Matus—12611113
WJun 8 · 18:45P. Sturma—1111113J. Matus—8870
WMay 29 · 18:40P. Sturma—1471111153J. Matus—161179132
P. Sturma10
LSep 2 · 13:15P. Sturma1.531061171Z. Chovancik2.3812117113WSep 2 · 11:40P. Sturma2.10511811113F. Mandrysz1.6711511692WSep 2 · 10:40P. Sturma1.73511611143Z. Chovancik2.00114118122WSep 2 · 09:40P. Sturma1.83811911113R. Zajac1.8311711962WSep 1 · 16:15P. Sturma1.9191211113J. Matus1.801110851WSep 1 · 14:45J. Jnr2.2012750P. Sturma1.611411113WSep 1 · 14:15L. Jr1.53731161P. Sturma2.3811115113LAug 30 · 17:10J. Sindler1.531111113P. Sturma2.389930WAug 30 · 15:40J. Sindler1.83913971P. Sturma1.83111111113LAug 30 · 15:10R. Jancak1.6111511113P. Sturma2.20511391
J. Matus10
LSep 1 · 16:15P. Sturma1.9191211113J. Matus1.801110851WSep 1 · 15:15J. Matus1.8011119113L. Jr1.91841191WSep 1 · 13:45J. Jnr1.91111291182J. Matus1.801310117113WSep 1 · 01:10P. Chvojka1.577480J. Matus2.251111113LSep 1 · 24:10J. Matus1.7381111562J. Jnr2.00118311113WAug 31 · 16:45J. Matus1.9111119113P. Chvojka1.80961181LAug 31 · 13:40O. Vaclahovsky1.50118411113J. Matus2.5091111372WAug 29 · 21:10R. Jancak1.6888111182J. Matus1.98111178113LAug 29 · 19:40J. Matus2.1062180R. Jancak1.671111203WAug 29 · 18:40J. Matus1.8081111113P. Sturma1.91113741
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.