TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13083101
Played Sep 7Finished
Petr Bruzek
Home
2.10
At publish
Lost last 7Form at publish
2–8Last 10Lost last 7
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
8113111191113––
Rotislav Hasmanda
Away
1.67
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 14:49 and never touched — 60.1% is still 60.1%
Graded at full timeRotislav Hasmanda to win
60.1%
60.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightpick shipped
How it is goingPetr Bruzek above · Rotislav Hasmanda below
Set 1 · 8-11
Set 2 · 3-11
Set 3 · 11-9
Set 4 · 11-13
Point 77 set 4, 11-13 — our read held Rotislav Hasmanda at 60.1%
77 points played in total.
H2H Petr Bruzek 2–13 Rotislav Hasmanda Petr Bruzek has won 2 of their 15 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 14:49What took a side5 for · 1 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.67 (56%)
Hasmanda
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
2-13 in 15
Hasmanda
Correct
gap of 11 in 15, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Bruzek 1312 vs Hasmanda 1445
Hasmanda
Correct
both rated, 133 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Bruzek 0% vs Hasmanda 60%
Hasmanda
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Bruzek 20% vs Hasmanda 60%
Hasmanda
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Bruzek -5 · Hasmanda +2
Bruzek
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 0 silent — and the gate let it through as .
Signal confidence: 62% — Clear lean (leans Hasmanda) · live re-read · sealed at 60% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Bruzek form (0%) is below what odds imply (48%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsBruzek 2.10 / Hasmanda 1.67
Signal prob.38% / 62%
Edge (Hasmanda)+6.3pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13083101
Bruzek2.10
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 7
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog38% won 30 of 80
Down 0–1, comes back18% 8 of 44
Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 29
Hasmanda1.67
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite64% won 116 of 182
Up 2–0, closes it90% 64 of 71
Up 1–0, closes it78% 90 of 116
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeBruzek2wins
AwayHasmanda8wins
2 of 10 to a deciderHasmanda leads 8–2, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeBruzek33.3%1 of 3
AwayHasmanda85.7%6 of 7
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Bruzek3Hasmanda7n = 10Hasmanda took 7 of 10
S2Bruzek4Hasmanda6n = 10Hasmanda took 6 of 10
S3Bruzek5Hasmanda5n = 10split evenly
S4Bruzek1Hasmanda8n = 9Hasmanda took 8 of 9
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home110%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away660%
0–3Straight, away110%
These 10 meetings
MetricBruzekHasmandaB − HBasisWins28−6in 10 meetingsFirst set37−4of 10Avg pointsper match35.540.7−5.2per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricBruzekHasmandaBasisWin rate · lifetime177 / 382 vs 389 / 78546.3%49.6%177 / 382 vs 389 / 785Avg sets wonper match1.92.0per matchAvg pointsper match35.537.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HasmandaBruzek 2.10/Hasmanda 1.67
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
62.1%
Hasmanda · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Hasmanda won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 3 · 02:00P. Bruzek—1111141152R. Hasmanda—7131213113
WAug 31 · 02:00P. Bruzek—1110117113R. Hasmanda—91251122
LApr 22 · 01:00P. Bruzek—121621R. Hasmanda—101111113
LFeb 9 · 23:30P. Bruzek—4990R. Hasmanda—1111113
LFeb 6 · 04:00P. Bruzek—991181R. Hasmanda—11115113
LFeb 6 · 01:30P. Bruzek—711871R. Hasmanda—11811113
WJan 5 · 23:00P. Bruzek—101111113R. Hasmanda—128851
LOct 9 · 21:06P. Bruzek—411791R. Hasmanda—11911113
LOct 9 · 20:30P. Bruzek—961161R. Hasmanda—11117113
LJul 21 · 23:30P. Bruzek—811691R. Hasmanda—11911113
P. Bruzek10
LSep 7 · 02:00P. Bruzek1.9198111252L. Sulava1.801111610113LSep 7 · 24:00A. Svoboda2.001111123P. Bruzek1.7368100LSep 6 · 22:30M. Novak1.571111113P. Bruzek2.256630LSep 3 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.251111141152R. Hasmanda1.577131213113LSep 3 · 01:00P. Bruzek1.6161151122J. Didi2.20119115113LSep 3 · 24:00O. Vitrovyj1.441311113P. Bruzek2.6311580LSep 2 · 22:30V. Dolezal1.441111113P. Bruzek2.634880LAug 31 · 03:00V. Dolezal1.501111113P. Bruzek2.407680WAug 31 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.751110117113R. Hasmanda1.4091251122LAug 31 · 01:00P. Bruzek2.2096110V. Dolezal1.611111133
R. Hasmanda10
LSep 7 · 03:28A. Svoboda1.531112113R. Hasmanda2.3821090LSep 7 · 02:30A. Svoboda1.731312113R. Hasmanda2.00111030WSep 6 · 23:30R. Hasmanda1.8311811113M. Novak1.83411661WSep 6 · 22:00R. Hasmanda1.441211113L. Sulava2.6310580LSep 3 · 03:28O. Vitrovyj1.5011118113R. Hasmanda2.50851161WSep 3 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.251111141152R. Hasmanda1.577131213113LSep 3 · 24:30R. Hasmanda1.5311810121V. Dolezal2.3861112143WSep 2 · 23:00R. Hasmanda2.6381111113O. Vitrovyj1.44117781WSep 2 · 22:00J. Didi2.5081161342R. Hasmanda1.501181111113LAug 31 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.751110117113R. Hasmanda1.4091251122
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.