TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13082823
Played Sep 6Finished
Rotislav Hasmanda
Home
1.44
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1210115118––––
Lubor Sulava
Away
2.63
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 13:40 and never touched — 66.1% is still 66.1%
Graded at full timeRotislav Hasmanda to win
66.1%
66.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingRotislav Hasmanda above · Lubor Sulava below
Set 1 · 12-10
Set 2 · 11-5
Set 3 · 11-8
Point 57 set 3, 11-8 — our read held Rotislav Hasmanda at 66.1%
57 points played in total.
H2H Rotislav Hasmanda 35–21 Lubor Sulava Lubor Sulava has won 21 of their 56 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 13:40What took a side3 for · 2 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.44 (65%)
Hasmanda
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
35-21 in 56
Hasmanda
Correct
gap of 14 in 56, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Hasmanda 1415 vs Sulava 1457
Sulava
Wrong
both rated, 41 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Hasmanda 60% vs Sulava 40%
Hasmanda
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Hasmanda 50% vs Sulava 70%
Sulava
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Hasmanda -1 · Sulava -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 66% — Clear lean (leans Hasmanda)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsHasmanda 1.44 / Sulava 2.63
Signal prob.66% / 34%
Edge (Hasmanda)+1.6pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13082823
Hasmanda1.44
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite64% won 116 of 182
Up 2–0, closes it90% 64 of 71
Up 1–0, closes it78% 90 of 116
Sulava2.63
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As underdog32% won 59 of 186
Down 0–1, comes back16% 18 of 110
Down 0–2, comes back3% 2 of 58
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeHasmanda10wins
AwaySulava0wins
5 of 10 to a deciderHasmanda leads 10–0, and 5 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeHasmanda100%8 of 8
AwaySulavan = 2, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Hasmanda8Sulava2n = 10Hasmanda took 8 of 10
S2Hasmanda7Sulava3n = 10Hasmanda took 7 of 10
S3Hasmanda7Sulava3n = 10Hasmanda took 7 of 10
S4Hasmanda3Sulava4n = 7Sulava took 4 of 7
S5Hasmanda5Sulava0n = 5Hasmanda took 5 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home330%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home550%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricHasmandaSulavaH − SBasisWins100+10in 10 meetingsFirst set82+6of 10Avg pointsper match44.635.4+9.2per matchSweeps30+33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHasmandaSulavaBasisWin rate · lifetime395 / 796 vs 482 / 97049.6%49.7%395 / 796 vs 482 / 970Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match37.737.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HasmandaHasmanda 1.44/Sulava 2.63
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
66.1%
Hasmanda · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Hasmanda won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WAug 23 · 15:00R. Hasmanda—111197113L. Sulava—53111192
WAug 21 · 23:30R. Hasmanda—1111113L. Sulava—6490
WAug 11 · 03:30R. Hasmanda—1111113L. Sulava—7890
WAug 11 · 01:30R. Hasmanda—9131111123L. Sulava—111585102
WJul 21 · 24:30R. Hasmanda—11129113L. Sulava—7101171
WJul 20 · 11:00R. Hasmanda—119119113L. Sulava—91191172
WJul 14 · 03:28R. Hasmanda—11119113L. Sulava—651171
WJul 14 · 24:30R. Hasmanda—1112114113L. Sulava—61481172
WJun 15 · 22:00R. Hasmanda—1117113L. Sulava—61590
WJun 10 · 15:00R. Hasmanda—1011118113L. Sulava—12341162
R. Hasmanda10
LSep 7 · 03:28A. Svoboda1.531112113R. Hasmanda2.3821090LSep 7 · 02:30A. Svoboda1.731312113R. Hasmanda2.00111030WSep 7 · 01:00P. Bruzek2.108311111R. Hasmanda1.6711119133WSep 6 · 23:30R. Hasmanda1.8311811113M. Novak1.83411661LSep 3 · 03:28O. Vitrovyj1.5011118113R. Hasmanda2.50851161WSep 3 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.251111141152R. Hasmanda1.577131213113LSep 3 · 24:30R. Hasmanda1.5311810121V. Dolezal2.3861112143WSep 2 · 23:00R. Hasmanda2.6381111113O. Vitrovyj1.44117781WSep 2 · 22:00J. Didi2.5081161342R. Hasmanda1.501181111113LSep 2 · 13:28A. Svoboda1.801111410113R. Hasmanda1.9149111292
L. Sulava10
WSep 7 · 02:58L. Sulava2.1011811113M. Novak1.67511961WSep 7 · 02:00P. Bruzek1.9198111252L. Sulava1.801111610113WSep 7 · 24:30L. Sulava2.2014616113M. Novak1.6112111471LSep 6 · 23:00L. Sulava2.636450A. Svoboda1.441111113LSep 6 · 13:30M. Barta1.75911911113L. Sulava1.9511711952WSep 6 · 12:30M. Barta1.9177111172L. Sulava1.80111165113WSep 6 · 11:30L. Sulava1.91121168113M. Stefek1.80104111172LSep 6 · 10:30J. Briska1.73971311113L. Sulava2.00111111342LAug 31 · 17:30L. Sulava1.73411111162M. Barta2.00118813113WAug 31 · 16:30M. Syroha2.501091351L. Sulava1.50121111113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.