TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13058254
Played Sep 2Finished
Julius Didi
Home
2.50
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
8111186111311411
Rotislav Hasmanda
Away
1.50
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 10:04 and never touched — 58.6% is still 58.6%
Graded at full timeJulius Didi to win
58.6%
58.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingJulius Didi above · Rotislav Hasmanda below
Set 1 · 8-11
Set 2 · 11-8
Set 3 · 6-11
Set 4 · 13-11
Set 5 · 4-11
Point 94 set 5, 4-11 — our read held Julius Didi at 58.6%
94 points played in total.
H2H Julius Didi 0–2 Rotislav Hasmanda Julius Didi has won 0 of their 2 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 10:04What took a side1 for · 1 against · 4 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.50 (63%)
Hasmanda
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-2 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Didi 1452 vs Hasmanda 1402
Didi
Wrong
both rated, 50 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Didi 40% vs Hasmanda 40%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Didi 50% vs Hasmanda 40%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Didi +2 · Hasmanda -2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 4 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 63% — Clear lean (leans Hasmanda) · live re-read · sealed at 41% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Hasmanda form (40%) is below what odds imply (67%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsDidi 2.50 / Hasmanda 1.50
Signal prob.38% / 63%
Edge (Hasmanda)+0.0pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13058254
Didi2.50
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As underdog43% won 95 of 223
Down 0–1, comes back19% 20 of 107
Down 0–2, comes back2% 1 of 62
Hasmanda1.50
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite64% won 113 of 178
Up 2–0, closes it90% 62 of 69
Up 1–0, closes it78% 87 of 112
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeDidi0wins
AwayHasmanda2wins
Hasmanda leads 2–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away2
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricDidiHasmandaD − HBasisWins02−2in 2 meetingsFirst set02−2of 2Avg pointsper match33.540.0−6.5per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricDidiHasmandaBasisWin rate · lifetime384 / 745 vs 392 / 79151.5%49.6%384 / 745 vs 392 / 791Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match37.737.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HasmandaDidi 2.50/Hasmanda 1.50
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
62.5%
Hasmanda · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Hasmanda won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LJul 1 · 15:00J. Didi—681191R. Hasmanda—11117113
LMar 17 · 03:30J. Didi—4111171R. Hasmanda—11513113
J. Didi10
LSep 7 · 08:30K. Darin1.44121111113J. Didi2.63147991WSep 7 · 07:30J. Didi1.831111113M. Stefek1.834450WSep 7 · 06:30T. Andrle1.73413441J. Didi2.00111111113LSep 4 · 20:59J. Didi2.109850V. Dolezal1.671111113LSep 4 · 20:00J. Didi1.30114871A. Svoboda3.4041111113WSep 4 · 19:30V. Dolezal1.5371114882J. Didi2.381141211113LSep 4 · 18:00J. Didi1.731198101M. Stefek2.0011111123LSep 3 · 03:04V. Dolezal1.2011139113J. Didi4.335111151LSep 3 · 02:30O. Vitrovyj1.731111133J. Didi2.0019110WSep 3 · 01:00P. Bruzek1.6161151122J. Didi2.20119115113
R. Hasmanda10
LSep 7 · 03:28A. Svoboda1.531112113R. Hasmanda2.3821090LSep 7 · 02:30A. Svoboda1.731312113R. Hasmanda2.00111030WSep 7 · 01:00P. Bruzek2.108311111R. Hasmanda1.6711119133WSep 6 · 23:30R. Hasmanda1.8311811113M. Novak1.83411661WSep 6 · 22:00R. Hasmanda1.441211113L. Sulava2.6310580LSep 3 · 03:28O. Vitrovyj1.5011118113R. Hasmanda2.50851161WSep 3 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.251111141152R. Hasmanda1.577131213113LSep 3 · 24:30R. Hasmanda1.5311810121V. Dolezal2.3861112143WSep 2 · 23:00R. Hasmanda2.6381111113O. Vitrovyj1.44117781LSep 2 · 13:28A. Svoboda1.801111410113R. Hasmanda1.9149111292
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.