TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13059647
Played Sep 3Finished
Petr Bruzek
Home
1.62
At publish
Lost last 3Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 3
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
611119511115211
Julius Didi
Away
2.20
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 16:03 and never touched — 59.2% is still 59.2%
Graded at full timePetr Bruzek to win
59.2%
59.2%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingPetr Bruzek above · Julius Didi below
Set 1 · 6-11
Set 2 · 11-9
Set 3 · 5-11
Set 4 · 11-5
Set 5 · 2-11
Point 82 set 5, 2-11 — our read held Petr Bruzek at 59.2%
82 points played in total.
H2H Petr Bruzek 8–5 Julius Didi Julius Didi has won 5 of their 13 meetings.
Last 10 · 5–5Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 16:03What took a side3 for · 2 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.61 (58%)
Bruzek
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
8-5 in 13
Bruzek
Wrong
gap of 3 in 13, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Bruzek 1342 vs Didi 1457
Didi
Correct
both rated, 114 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Bruzek 20% vs Didi 60%
Didi
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Bruzek 40% vs Didi 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Bruzek -3 · Didi +1
Bruzek
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 55% — Slight lean (leans Bruzek) · live re-read · sealed at 59% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Didi form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (45%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsBruzek 1.61 / Didi 2.20
Signal prob.55% / 45%
Edge (Bruzek)-2.4pp (anti-value)
Czech Liga Pro · #13059647
Bruzek1.61
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 3
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite58% won 45 of 77
Up 2–0, closes it92% 24 of 26
Up 1–0, closes it79% 34 of 43
Didi2.20
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As underdog43% won 95 of 223
Down 0–1, comes back19% 20 of 107
Down 0–2, comes back2% 1 of 62
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeBruzek5wins
AwayDidi5wins
2 of 10 to a deciderLevel at 5–5, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeBruzek66.7%4 of 6
AwayDidi75%3 of 4
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Bruzek6Didi4n = 10Bruzek took 6 of 10
S2Bruzek4Didi6n = 10Didi took 6 of 10
S3Bruzek4Didi6n = 10Didi took 6 of 10
S4Bruzek7Didi2n = 9Bruzek took 7 of 9
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home550%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away110%
These 10 meetings
MetricBruzekDidiB − DBasisWins550in 10 meetingsFirst set64+2of 10Avg pointsper match38.038.2−0.2per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricBruzekDidiBasisWin rate · lifetime177 / 383 vs 386 / 74846.2%51.6%177 / 383 vs 386 / 748Avg sets wonper match1.92.0per matchAvg pointsper match35.537.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
BruzekBruzek 1.61/Didi 2.20
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
55.3%
Bruzek · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Didi won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 3 · 01:00P. Bruzek—61151122J. Didi—119115113
WAug 29 · 24:30P. Bruzek—11119113J. Didi—771161
WAug 7 · 19:00P. Bruzek—111011113J. Didi—912981
LAug 4 · 03:28P. Bruzek—111181292J. Didi—1371110113
WAug 4 · 02:00P. Bruzek—81111113J. Didi—117771
WJul 12 · 07:30P. Bruzek—11812113J. Didi—4111091
WJul 4 · 14:30P. Bruzek—11511113J. Didi—911581
LJun 27 · 19:00P. Bruzek—8950J. Didi—1111113
LJun 13 · 15:30P. Bruzek—1171091J. Didi—91112113
LJun 12 · 20:58P. Bruzek—118281J. Didi—61111113
P. Bruzek10
LSep 7 · 02:00P. Bruzek1.9198111252L. Sulava1.801111610113LSep 7 · 01:00P. Bruzek2.108311111R. Hasmanda1.6711119133LSep 7 · 24:00A. Svoboda2.001111123P. Bruzek1.7368100LSep 6 · 22:30M. Novak1.571111113P. Bruzek2.256630LSep 3 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.251111141152R. Hasmanda1.577131213113LSep 3 · 24:00O. Vitrovyj1.441311113P. Bruzek2.6311580LSep 2 · 22:30V. Dolezal1.441111113P. Bruzek2.634880LAug 31 · 03:00V. Dolezal1.501111113P. Bruzek2.407680WAug 31 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.751110117113R. Hasmanda1.4091251122LAug 31 · 01:00P. Bruzek2.2096110V. Dolezal1.611111133
J. Didi10
LSep 7 · 08:30K. Darin1.44121111113J. Didi2.63147991WSep 7 · 07:30J. Didi1.831111113M. Stefek1.834450WSep 7 · 06:30T. Andrle1.73413441J. Didi2.00111111113LSep 4 · 20:59J. Didi2.109850V. Dolezal1.671111113LSep 4 · 20:00J. Didi1.30114871A. Svoboda3.4041111113WSep 4 · 19:30V. Dolezal1.5371114882J. Didi2.381141211113LSep 4 · 18:00J. Didi1.731198101M. Stefek2.0011111123LSep 3 · 03:04V. Dolezal1.2011139113J. Didi4.335111151LSep 3 · 02:30O. Vitrovyj1.731111133J. Didi2.0019110WSep 2 · 23:30J. Didi2.38118119123V. Dolezal1.53411711102
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.