TT Lossbeater/TT Cup
TT CupMatch #13076895
Played Sep 4Finished
Kamil Przeczek
Home
1.80
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
116611611117116
Petr Chlad
Away
1.91
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 10:39 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timePetr Chlad to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingKamil Przeczek above · Petr Chlad below
Set 1 · 11-6
Set 2 · 6-11
Set 3 · 6-11
Set 4 · 11-7
Set 5 · 11-6
Point 86 set 5, 11-6 — our read held Petr Chlad at 54.0%
86 points played in total.
H2H Kamil Przeczek 1–1 Petr Chlad Dead even across their 2 meetings.
Last 2 · 1–1Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 10:39What took a side1 for · 1 against · 4 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.80 (51%)
Przeczek
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-1 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Przeczek 1385 vs Chlad 1439
Chlad
Wrong
both rated, 54 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Przeczek 60% vs Chlad 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Przeczek 50% vs Chlad 60%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Przeczek +1 · Chlad +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 4 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Chlad)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsPrzeczek 1.80 / Chlad 1.91
Signal prob.46% / 54%
Edge (Chlad)+5.5pp
TT Cup · #13076895
Przeczek1.80
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite44% won 24 of 54
Up 2–0, closes it100% 6 of 6
Up 1–0, closes it60% 15 of 25
Chlad1.91
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog37% won 27 of 73
Down 0–1, comes back33% 17 of 51
Down 0–2, comes back11% 3 of 27
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomePrzeczek1wins
AwayChlad1wins
Level at 1–1.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home1
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricPrzeczekChladP − CBasisWins110in 2 meetingsFirst set20+2of 2Avg pointsper match33.032.0+1.0per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricPrzeczekChladBasisWin rate · lifetime73 / 160 vs 131 / 26845.6%48.9%73 / 160 vs 131 / 268Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match38.038.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ChladPrzeczek 1.80/Chlad 1.91
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Chlad · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Przeczek won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LJul 24 · 21:20K. Przeczek—118591P. Chlad—91111113
WJul 24 · 18:45K. Przeczek—1111113P. Chlad—8590
K. Przeczek10
WSep 4 · 21:15K. Przeczek1.50111111113P. Jokiel2.50713691WSep 4 · 18:40P. Jokiel2.257690K. Przeczek1.571111113LSep 4 · 18:10V. Molin2.101111123K. Przeczek1.6728100WSep 3 · 21:18F. Theodor1.677811111K. Przeczek2.1011119133WSep 3 · 20:15V. Molin1.91811951K. Przeczek1.8011711113LSep 3 · 19:15K. Przeczek1.806890F. Theodor1.911111113WSep 3 · 17:45O. Kus1.6711911262K. Przeczek2.10311811113WSep 1 · 20:40J. Vanous2.0067171182K. Przeczek1.731111157113LSep 1 · 20:10K. Przeczek1.617580J. Vanous2.201111113LSep 1 · 18:40O. Kus1.67811117113K. Przeczek2.1011951192
P. Chlad10
LSep 4 · 20:45P. Chlad1.8056120V. Molin1.911111143WSep 4 · 19:10P. Chlad1.911411144113V. Molin1.80165121192LSep 4 · 17:40P. Jokiel2.2511113113P. Chlad1.57981171WSep 2 · 09:25A. Strelec2.10711111072P. Chlad1.65119812113WSep 2 · 07:40P. Chlad2.0041111113J. Sindler1.73117891LSep 2 · 06:40P. Chlad1.6788111192A. Strelec2.10111197113WSep 2 · 05:40P. Chlad1.671111113L. Snr2.104690LAug 29 · 16:45P. Chlad1.83961181R. Jancak1.8311115113WAug 29 · 15:40P. Chlad1.6113613113B. Jonas2.2011111191WAug 29 · 14:40P. Chlad1.91451111113R. Jancak1.8011116922
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.