TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Setka CupMatch #13126920
Played Sep 14Finished
Jan Blazek
Home
3.00
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
114116811115––
Ladislav Tuma
Away
1.36
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 23:17 and never touched — 72.0% is still 72.0%
Graded at full timeLadislav Tuma to win
72.0%
72.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingJan Blazek above · Ladislav Tuma below
Set 1 · 11-4
Set 2 · 11-6
Set 3 · 8-11
Set 4 · 11-5
Point 67 set 4, 11-5 — our read held Ladislav Tuma at 72.0%
67 points played in total.
H2H Jan Blazek 7–11 Ladislav Tuma Jan Blazek has won 7 of their 18 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 23:17What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.36 (69%)
Tuma
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
7-11 in 18
Tuma
Wrong
gap of 4 in 18, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Blazek 1381 vs Tuma 1501
Tuma
Wrong
both rated, 120 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Blazek 40% vs Tuma 80%
Tuma
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Blazek 60% vs Tuma 70%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Blazek +1 · Tuma +4
Tuma
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 70% — Strong (leans Tuma) · live re-read · sealed at 72% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsBlazek 3.00 / Tuma 1.36
Signal prob.30% / 70%
Edge (Tuma)+1.2pp
Setka Cup · #13126920
Blazek3.00
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog38% won 49 of 130
Down 0–1, comes back21% 16 of 75
Down 0–2, comes back3% 1 of 35
Tuma1.36
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As favourite64% won 56 of 87
Up 2–0, closes it97% 28 of 29
Up 1–0, closes it88% 45 of 51
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeBlazek3wins
AwayTuma7wins
4 of 10 to a deciderTuma leads 7–3, and 4 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeBlazekn = 2, below the 3 needed
AwayTuma75%6 of 8
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Blazek2Tuma8n = 10Tuma took 8 of 10
S2Blazek5Tuma5n = 10split evenly
S3Blazek3Tuma7n = 10Tuma took 7 of 10
S4Blazek2Tuma6n = 8Tuma took 6 of 8
S5Blazek3Tuma1n = 4Blazek took 3 of 4
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home330%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away440%
0–3Straight, away220%
These 10 meetings
MetricBlazekTumaB − TBasisWins37−4in 10 meetingsFirst set28−6of 10Avg pointsper match38.242.9−4.7per matchSweeps02−23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricBlazekTumaBasisWin rate · lifetime164 / 378 vs 237 / 47043.4%50.4%164 / 378 vs 237 / 470Avg sets wonper match2.02.1per matchAvg pointsper match39.138.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
TumaBlazek 3.00/Tuma 1.36
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
70%
Tuma · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Blazek won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 27 · 14:30J. Blazek34961181L. Tuma4011117113
LMay 21 · 13:30J. Blazek4151111682L. Tuma44116511113
LApr 2 · 16:43J. Blazek2481060L. Tuma341112113
WApr 2 · 14:15J. Blazek529111011113L. Tuma5011912992
LMar 24 · 17:59J. Blazek29611751L. Tuma4111811113
LMar 24 · 17:00J. Blazek357116111L. Tuma4311811133
WFeb 27 · 15:45J. Blazek51111187143L. Tuma51981111122
LFeb 25 · 16:30J. Blazek351191051L. Tuma4171112113
LFeb 20 · 16:30J. Blazek2891090L. Tuma341112113
WFeb 5 · 16:00J. Blazek538111211113L. Tuma51111310982
J. Blazek10
WSep 14 · 13:30J. Blazek2.201216113J. Hanacek1.61101470LSep 9 · 12:29J. Blazek2.10211471M. Melisek1.6711811113LSep 9 · 11:30M. Melisek1.831111113J. Blazek1.839250WSep 9 · 11:00J. Blazek1.8391112113P. Moulis1.831171051LSep 9 · 10:00J. Blazek2.10125991J. Jnr1.67101111113WSep 8 · 17:08J. Blazek3.2511911113P. Kotrbacek1.33811491WSep 8 · 16:00J. Blazek2.00711415113M. Melisek1.73118111352WSep 8 · 14:30J. Hanacek1.50712771J. Blazek2.50111011113LSep 8 · 14:00P. Kotrbacek1.401112113J. Blazek2.7521090WSep 3 · 12:28J. Krejcik1.8391170J. Blazek1.831113113
L. Tuma10
WSep 14 · 14:00E. Ondracek1.737650L. Tuma2.001111113WSep 4 · 16:58K. Jirousek2.1010880L. Tuma1.671211113WSep 4 · 15:30F. Husek2.0081191192L. Tuma1.73119115113WSep 4 · 15:00L. Tuma1.911111113K. Jirousek1.809950LSep 4 · 14:00L. Tuma1.57101111922P. Kotrbacek2.25127811113LSep 2 · 16:58L. Tuma2.20811100V. Toman1.611113123WSep 2 · 16:00M. Vorel1.7377120L. Tuma2.001111143LSep 2 · 15:00V. Toman1.73611117113L. Tuma2.0011941172WSep 2 · 13:30P. Hlina2.25991461L. Tuma1.57111112113WAug 27 · 16:59L. Tuma2.751111113E. Ondracek1.409180
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.