TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Setka CupMatch #13094897
Played Sep 8Finished
Josef Hanacek
Home
1.50
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
7111210711711––
Jan Blazek
Away
2.50
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:55 and never touched — 63.7% is still 63.7%
Graded at full timeJosef Hanacek to win
63.7%
63.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingJosef Hanacek above · Jan Blazek below
Set 1 · 7-11
Set 2 · 12-10
Set 3 · 7-11
Set 4 · 7-11
Point 76 set 4, 7-11 — our read held Josef Hanacek at 63.7%
76 points played in total.
H2H Josef Hanacek 6–4 Jan Blazek Jan Blazek has won 4 of their 10 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 20:55What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.50 (63%)
Hanacek
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
6-4 in 10
Hanacek
Wrong
gap of 2 in 10, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Hanacek 1374 vs Blazek 1373
Hanacek
Wrong
both rated, 0 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Hanacek 20% vs Blazek 60%
Blazek
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Hanacek 30% vs Blazek 40%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Hanacek -1 · Blazek -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 64% — Clear lean (leans Hanacek)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Blazek form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (40%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsHanacek 1.50 / Blazek 2.50
Signal prob.64% / 36%
Edge (Hanacek)+1.2pp
Setka Cup · #13094897
Hanacek1.50
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
20%takes the first set · 2 of 10
As favourite55% won 68 of 124
Up 2–0, closes it90% 26 of 29
Up 1–0, closes it84% 46 of 55
Blazek2.50
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
20%takes the first set · 2 of 10
As underdog37% won 48 of 130
Down 0–1, comes back21% 16 of 76
Down 0–2, comes back3% 1 of 35
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeHanacek6wins
AwayBlazek4wins
3 of 10 to a deciderHanacek leads 6–4, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeHanacek100%5 of 5
AwayBlazek80%4 of 5
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Hanacek5Blazek5n = 10split evenly
S2Hanacek6Blazek4n = 10Hanacek took 6 of 10
S3Hanacek7Blazek3n = 10Hanacek took 7 of 10
S4Hanacek2Blazek5n = 7Blazek took 5 of 7
S5Hanacek2Blazek1n = 3Hanacek took 2 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home220%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away110%
These 10 meetings
MetricHanacekBlazekH − BBasisWins64+2in 10 meetingsFirst set550of 10Avg pointsper match38.335.7+2.6per matchSweeps21+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHanacekBlazekBasisWin rate · lifetime226 / 438 vs 162 / 37751.6%43%226 / 438 vs 162 / 377Avg sets wonper match2.11.9per matchAvg pointsper match39.239.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HanacekHanacek 1.50/Blazek 2.50
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
63.7%
Hanacek · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Blazek won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 28 · 12:23J. Hanacek—81411592J. Blazek—1112811113
WAug 28 · 09:15J. Hanacek—1111113J. Blazek—7290
WAug 21 · 13:04J. Hanacek—118116123J. Blazek—811511102
LAug 21 · 09:30J. Hanacek—1011891J. Blazek—12811113
LAug 11 · 12:34J. Hanacek—8650J. Blazek—1111113
WAug 11 · 10:00J. Hanacek—111011113J. Blazek—812181
WAug 5 · 16:59J. Hanacek—81111113J. Blazek—119851
LAug 5 · 15:00J. Hanacek—881171J. Blazek—11116113
WAug 4 · 15:00J. Hanacek—131157113J. Blazek—117111162
WJul 15 · 15:30J. Hanacek—1111113J. Blazek—8470
J. Hanacek10
LSep 8 · 15:30J. Hanacek1.8371181262P. Kotrbacek1.831171110113LSep 8 · 13:30J. Hanacek1.5710101161M. Melisek2.2512126113WSep 5 · 16:29J. Hanacek4.00116117113L. Hendrych1.2251141152LSep 5 · 16:00F. Kubos1.801111103J. Hanacek1.915870LSep 5 · 13:30L. Hendrych1.251111113J. Hanacek3.759690LSep 3 · 12:23J. Hanacek2.201011110J. Marhol1.611213133LSep 3 · 11:45O. Plyska1.67117111113J. Hanacek2.1041181192LSep 3 · 10:45M. Vana1.501112114113J. Hanacek2.5091471192WSep 3 · 09:15J. Marhol1.57121211982J. Hanacek2.251014711113LSep 2 · 09:03T. Bertho1.61117139113J. Hanacek2.20911111162
J. Blazek10
LSep 8 · 14:00P. Kotrbacek1.401112113J. Blazek2.7521090WSep 3 · 12:28J. Krejcik1.8391170J. Blazek1.831113113WSep 3 · 11:30J. Blazek1.731071513113J. Krejcik2.001211131162WSep 3 · 10:30J. Blazek2.501071111113J. Jnr1.5012116972LSep 3 · 09:30J. Blazek2.0092111162J. Seeman1.73111199113WAug 28 · 12:23J. Hanacek1.4081411592J. Blazek2.751112811113LAug 28 · 11:15J. Blazek1.8311161152M. Melisek1.83119118113LAug 28 · 10:15J. Blazek2.6361080M. Vorel1.441112113LAug 28 · 09:15J. Blazek2.257290J. Hanacek1.571111113LAug 27 · 16:29J. Jnr1.801111123J. Blazek1.9176100
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.