TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Setka CupMatch #13067403
Played Sep 3Finished
Jan Blazek
Home
2.00
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Won last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
911211119119611
Jan Seeman
Away
1.73
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 21:48 and never touched — 56.1% is still 56.1%
Graded at full timeJan Seeman to win
56.1%
56.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingJan Blazek above · Jan Seeman below
Set 1 · 9-11
Set 2 · 2-11
Set 3 · 11-9
Set 4 · 11-9
Set 5 · 6-11
Point 90 set 5, 6-11 — our read held Jan Seeman at 56.1%
90 points played in total.
H2H Jan Blazek 0–2 Jan Seeman Jan Blazek has won 0 of their 2 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 21:48What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.73 (54%)
Seeman
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-2 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Blazek 1361 vs Seeman 1311
Blazek
Wrong
both rated, 51 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Blazek 20% vs Seeman 80%
Seeman
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Blazek 30% vs Seeman 50%
Seeman
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Blazek +1 · Seeman -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Seeman) · live re-read · sealed at 56% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Seeman form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (58%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsBlazek 2.00 / Seeman 1.73
Signal prob.46% / 54%
Edge (Seeman)+0.3pp
Setka Cup · #13067403
Blazek2.00
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
20%takes the first set · 2 of 10
As underdog36% won 46 of 127
Down 0–1, comes back20% 15 of 74
Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 33
Seeman1.73
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite65% won 34 of 52
Up 2–0, closes it85% 17 of 20
Up 1–0, closes it86% 24 of 28
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeBlazek0wins
AwaySeeman2wins
Seeman leads 2–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away2
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricBlazekSeemanB − SBasisWins02−2in 2 meetingsFirst set20+2of 2Avg pointsper match38.541.5−3.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricBlazekSeemanBasisWin rate · lifetime160 / 377 vs 134 / 28142.4%47.7%160 / 377 vs 134 / 281Avg sets wonper match1.92.0per matchAvg pointsper match39.139.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
SeemanBlazek 2.00/Seeman 1.73
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
54%
Seeman · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Seeman won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LDec 30 · 13:30J. Blazek—11101081J. Seeman—81212113
LDec 30 · 12:30J. Blazek—1110891J. Seeman—61211113
J. Blazek10
WSep 3 · 12:28J. Krejcik1.8391170J. Blazek1.831113113WSep 3 · 11:30J. Blazek1.731071513113J. Krejcik2.001211131162WSep 3 · 10:30J. Blazek2.501071111113J. Jnr1.5012116972WAug 28 · 12:23J. Hanacek1.4081411592J. Blazek2.751112811113LAug 28 · 11:15J. Blazek1.8311161152M. Melisek1.83119118113LAug 28 · 10:15J. Blazek2.6361080M. Vorel1.441112113LAug 28 · 09:15J. Blazek2.257290J. Hanacek1.571111113LAug 27 · 16:29J. Jnr1.801111123J. Blazek1.9176100WAug 27 · 15:30J. Blazek2.63911116113E. Ondracek1.4411391182LAug 27 · 14:30J. Blazek2.75961181L. Tuma1.4011117113
J. Seeman10
WSep 3 · 12:58J. Seeman2.0011119113J. Jnr1.73681171WSep 3 · 12:00J. Jnr1.5791090J. Seeman2.251112113LSep 3 · 11:00J. Krejcik2.001111113J. Seeman1.733940LAug 31 · 13:03J. Seeman1.9175111112D. Sabuka1.80111186113WAug 31 · 12:00J. Krejcik1.57713591J. Seeman2.25111111113WAug 31 · 11:00D. Sabuka1.678117111J. Seeman2.1011711133WAug 31 · 09:30V. Kucala2.25511991J. Seeman1.5711811113WAug 30 · 12:39J. Seeman1.57691111113V. Kucala2.2511116582LAug 30 · 12:00D. Sabuka1.67111175143J. Seeman2.10871111122LAug 30 · 11:00P. Moulis1.4411911113J. Seeman2.63811381
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.