TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13100979
Played Sep 9Finished
Mariusz Adamus
Home
1.88
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 2
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
119117911118––
Michal Paszkiewicz
Away
1.82
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 21:28 and never touched — 55.6% is still 55.6%
Graded at full timeMichal Paszkiewicz to win
55.6%
55.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
77 points played in total.
Set by set
119117911118––
H2H Mariusz Adamus 14–14 Michal Paszkiewicz Dead even across their 28 meetings.
Last 10 · 4–6Head to head
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 21:28What took a side2 for · 2 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.82 (51%)
Paszkiewicz
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
14-14 in 28
—
Too close
gap of 0, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Adamus 1329 vs Paszkiewicz 1340
Paszkiewicz
Wrong
both rated, 11 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Adamus 40% vs Paszkiewicz 20%
Adamus
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Adamus 50% vs Paszkiewicz 30%
Adamus
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Adamus -2 · Paszkiewicz -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Paszkiewicz) · live re-read · sealed at 56% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Paszkiewicz form (20%) is below what odds imply (55%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAdamus 1.88 / Paszkiewicz 1.82
Signal prob.46% / 54%
Edge (Paszkiewicz)+3.2pp
TT Elite Series · #13100979
Adamus1.88
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog42% won 180 of 434
Down 0–1, comes back23% 52 of 226
Down 0–2, comes back10% 12 of 120
Paszkiewicz1.82
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite58% won 81 of 139
Up 2–0, closes it96% 42 of 44
Up 1–0, closes it87% 60 of 69
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeAdamus4wins
AwayPaszkiewicz6wins
2 of 10 to a deciderPaszkiewicz leads 6–4, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeAdamus57.1%4 of 7
AwayPaszkiewicz100%3 of 3
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Adamus7Paszkiewicz3n = 10Adamus took 7 of 10
S2Adamus5Paszkiewicz5n = 10split evenly
S3Adamus4Paszkiewicz6n = 10Paszkiewicz took 6 of 10
S4Adamus3Paszkiewicz5n = 8Paszkiewicz took 5 of 8
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home330%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away330%
0–3Straight, away110%
These 10 meetings
MetricAdamusPaszkiewiczA − PBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set73+4of 10Avg pointsper match36.936.3+0.6per matchSweeps1103–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAdamusPaszkiewiczBasisWin rate · lifetime794 / 1635 vs 429 / 80548.6%53.3%794 / 1635 vs 429 / 805Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match39.137.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
PaszkiewiczAdamus 1.88/Paszkiewicz 1.82
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Paszkiewicz · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Adamus won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 9 · 02:20M. Adamus—1111113M. Paszkiewicz—4940
LAug 17 · 20:20M. Adamus—91111762M. Paszkiewicz—114411113
WJul 31 · 03:50M. Adamus—11511113M. Paszkiewicz—611951
LJul 8 · 05:35M. Adamus—1161181M. Paszkiewicz—51113113
LApr 11 · 08:00M. Adamus—1151381M. Paszkiewicz—81115113
WApr 1 · 05:35M. Adamus—11117113M. Paszkiewicz—791181
LMar 27 · 07:35M. Adamus—9860M. Paszkiewicz—1111113
LMar 13 · 09:20M. Adamus—11119242M. Paszkiewicz—831111113
LJan 31 · 05:00M. Adamus—9111071M. Paszkiewicz—11912113
WJan 22 · 05:00M. Adamus—111111113M. Paszkiewicz—613961
M. Adamus10
LSep 9 · 06:45J. Kaczmarek2.10511711113M. Adamus1.6711811692LSep 9 · 06:00M. Lebek1.701112113M. Adamus1.9581090WSep 9 · 05:10M. Adamus1.8311611123O. Sokolowski1.866114101LSep 9 · 04:00M. Adamus1.57971191M. Sikon2.1611116113WSep 9 · 02:20M. Adamus1.851111113M. Paszkiewicz1.854940WSep 9 · 24:45M. Tkocz1.41118871M. Adamus2.5581111113LSep 9 · 24:00M. Sikon2.20111211113M. Adamus1.58714891LSep 8 · 23:10M. Adamus1.8088111152O. Sokolowski1.86111155113WSep 8 · 22:00M. Adamus2.43116711113M. Lebek1.4591111662WSep 8 · 08:20A. Ruszkiewicz2.15511212102M. Adamus1.601171110123
M. Paszkiewicz10
LSep 9 · 07:35O. Sokolowski1.831111113M. Paszkiewicz1.837960WSep 9 · 05:35J. Kaczmarek2.103670M. Paszkiewicz1.601111113LSep 9 · 04:50M. Sikon2.00111110113M. Paszkiewicz1.71591261LSep 9 · 03:10M. Lebek1.4611129113M. Paszkiewicz2.506101161LSep 9 · 02:20M. Adamus1.851111113M. Paszkiewicz1.854940LSep 9 · 01:35O. Sokolowski1.8351111113M. Paszkiewicz1.83117661LSep 8 · 23:35M. Tkocz1.3711511113M. Paszkiewicz2.70911931WSep 8 · 22:50M. Lebek1.50141171262M. Paszkiewicz2.4012131110113LSep 8 · 21:10M. Sikon1.90111112133M. Paszkiewicz1.8051310111WSep 4 · 08:00M. Paszkiewicz1.55116129113A. Ruszkiewicz2.25711101182
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.