TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Setka CupMatch #13100848
Played Sep 9Finished
Petr Provaznik
Home
2.25
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
1311411117117––
Tomas Hucko
Away
1.57
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:47 and never touched — 58.6% is still 58.6%
Graded at full timeTomas Hucko to win
58.6%
58.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingPetr Provaznik above · Tomas Hucko below
Set 1 · 13-11
Set 2 · 4-11
Set 3 · 11-7
Set 4 · 11-7
Point 75 set 4, 11-7 — our read held Tomas Hucko at 58.6%
75 points played in total.
H2H Petr Provaznik 5–6 Tomas Hucko Petr Provaznik has won 5 of their 11 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 20:47What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.57 (59%)
Hucko
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
5-6 in 11
—
Too close
gap of 1, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Provaznik 1526 vs Hucko 1643
Hucko
Wrong
both rated, 117 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Provaznik 40% vs Hucko 60%
Hucko
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Provaznik 30% vs Hucko 60%
Hucko
Wrong
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Provaznik -1 · Hucko -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 62% — Slight lean (leans Hucko) · live re-read · sealed at 59% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsProvaznik 2.25 / Hucko 1.57
Signal prob.38% / 62%
Edge (Hucko)+2.8pp
Setka Cup · #13100848
Provaznik2.25
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog43% won 34 of 79
Down 0–1, comes back35% 15 of 43
Down 0–2, comes back9% 2 of 22
Hucko1.57
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite54% won 33 of 61
Up 2–0, closes it93% 14 of 15
Up 1–0, closes it66% 21 of 32
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeProvaznik4wins
AwayHucko6wins
6 of 10 to a deciderHucko leads 6–4, and 6 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeProvaznik42.9%3 of 7
AwayHucko66.7%2 of 3
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Provaznik7Hucko3n = 10Provaznik took 7 of 10
S2Provaznik4Hucko6n = 10Hucko took 6 of 10
S3Provaznik6Hucko4n = 10Provaznik took 6 of 10
S4Provaznik1Hucko8n = 9Hucko took 8 of 9
S5Provaznik3Hucko3n = 6split evenly
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home330%
2–3Decider, away330%
1–3Four sets, away330%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricProvaznikHuckoP − HBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set73+4of 10Avg pointsper match43.843.2+0.6per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricProvaznikHuckoBasisWin rate · lifetime233 / 492 vs 174 / 32947.4%52.9%233 / 492 vs 174 / 329Avg sets wonper match2.02.1per matchAvg pointsper match38.738.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HuckoProvaznik 2.25/Hucko 1.57
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
61.7%
Hucko · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Provaznik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 1 · 18:45P. Provaznik—11981162T. Hucko—911114113
LOct 8 · 05:30P. Provaznik—1113111092T. Hucko—1311612113
LSep 25 · 12:00P. Provaznik—1198101T. Hucko—81111123
LAug 7 · 05:30P. Provaznik—121112962T. Hucko—1481011113
LJun 28 · 06:15P. Provaznik—114551T. Hucko—81111113
LJun 12 · 20:55P. Provaznik—11109101T. Hucko—11211123
WJun 12 · 18:45P. Provaznik—1112118133T. Hucko—814811112
WMay 2 · 16:55P. Provaznik—116129113T. Hucko—911101192
WMay 2 · 15:45P. Provaznik—811127113T. Hucko—113101182
WApr 18 · 05:30P. Provaznik—1111113T. Hucko—7710
P. Provaznik10
LSep 9 · 14:30P. Provaznik2.503111051P. Hala1.5011512113WSep 9 · 13:30P. Provaznik2.25912611113L. Kolman1.57111011732WSep 4 · 16:34M. Bruk1.6551191112P. Provaznik2.10113118113LSep 4 · 15:15P. Provaznik1.91118111452O. Horak1.809111312113LSep 4 · 14:15P. Provaznik2.0011761172J. Simek1.73711117113LSep 4 · 13:15P. Provaznik2.001461181M. Bruk1.7316119113LSep 1 · 20:48P. Provaznik2.751071171M. Hajek1.4012116113WSep 1 · 19:45M. Hajek1.50101170P. Provaznik2.501213113LSep 1 · 18:45T. Hucko1.67911114113P. Provaznik2.1011981162LSep 1 · 17:15P. Maly1.7361111133P. Provaznik2.001187111
T. Hucko10
WSep 9 · 15:00T. Hucko1.73158116143L. Kolman2.001311711122LSep 9 · 14:00T. Hucko1.576490P. Hala2.251111113WSep 4 · 12:13M. Svitac1.7313580T. Hucko2.001511113LSep 4 · 11:15T. Hucko2.0015414462M. Svitac1.7313111211113WSep 4 · 10:15T. Hucko1.801113113M. Hajek1.9191170WSep 4 · 09:15T. Hucko1.8351111113Z. Vasatko1.83116871WSep 1 · 20:18T. Hucko1.5711101210113P. Maly2.25912101262WSep 1 · 19:15P. Maly2.388990T. Hucko1.531111113WSep 1 · 18:45T. Hucko1.67911114113P. Provaznik2.1011981162LSep 1 · 17:45T. Hucko1.80111264102M. Hajek1.917101111123
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.