TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13092714
Played Sep 8Finished
Rotislav Hasmanda
Home
1.36
At publish
Lost last 3Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 3
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
2111210117118––
Lubor Sulava
Away
3.00
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:57 and never touched — 69.6% is still 69.6%
Graded at full timeRotislav Hasmanda to win
69.6%
69.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingRotislav Hasmanda above · Lubor Sulava below
Set 1 · 2-11
Set 2 · 12-10
Set 3 · 11-7
Set 4 · 11-8
Point 72 set 4, 11-8 — our read held Rotislav Hasmanda at 69.6%
72 points played in total.
H2H Rotislav Hasmanda 37–21 Lubor Sulava Lubor Sulava has won 21 of their 58 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 12:57What took a side3 for · 2 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.36 (69%)
Hasmanda
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
37-21 in 58
Hasmanda
Correct
gap of 16 in 58, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Hasmanda 1402 vs Sulava 1460
Sulava
Wrong
both rated, 57 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Hasmanda 40% vs Sulava 60%
Sulava
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Hasmanda 50% vs Sulava 50%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Hasmanda -3 · Sulava -1
Hasmanda
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 70% — Clear lean (leans Hasmanda)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Sulava form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (33%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsHasmanda 1.36 / Sulava 3.00
Signal prob.70% / 30%
Edge (Hasmanda)+0.8pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13092714
Hasmanda1.36
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 3
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite65% won 117 of 181
Up 2–0, closes it90% 65 of 72
Up 1–0, closes it78% 91 of 116
Sulava3.00
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As underdog32% won 62 of 192
Down 0–1, comes back16% 18 of 111
Down 0–2, comes back3% 2 of 59
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeHasmanda10wins
AwaySulava0wins
5 of 10 to a deciderHasmanda leads 10–0, and 5 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeHasmanda100%8 of 8
AwaySulavan = 2, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Hasmanda8Sulava2n = 10Hasmanda took 8 of 10
S2Hasmanda7Sulava3n = 10Hasmanda took 7 of 10
S3Hasmanda7Sulava3n = 10Hasmanda took 7 of 10
S4Hasmanda3Sulava4n = 7Sulava took 4 of 7
S5Hasmanda5Sulava0n = 5Hasmanda took 5 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home330%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home550%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricHasmandaSulavaH − SBasisWins100+10in 10 meetingsFirst set82+6of 10Avg pointsper match44.035.6+8.4per matchSweeps30+33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHasmandaSulavaBasisWin rate · lifetime390 / 789 vs 479 / 96349.4%49.7%390 / 789 vs 479 / 963Avg sets wonper match2.02.0per matchAvg pointsper match37.737.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HasmandaHasmanda 1.36/Sulava 3.00
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
69.6%
Hasmanda · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Hasmanda won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 6 · 22:00R. Hasmanda—1211113L. Sulava—10580
WAug 28 · 02:00R. Hasmanda—811137113L. Sulava—119111132
WAug 23 · 15:00R. Hasmanda—111197113L. Sulava—53111192
WAug 21 · 23:30R. Hasmanda—1111113L. Sulava—6490
WAug 11 · 03:30R. Hasmanda—1111113L. Sulava—7890
WAug 11 · 01:30R. Hasmanda—9131111123L. Sulava—111585102
WJul 21 · 24:30R. Hasmanda—11129113L. Sulava—7101171
WJul 20 · 11:00R. Hasmanda—119119113L. Sulava—91191172
WJul 14 · 03:28R. Hasmanda—11119113L. Sulava—651171
WJul 14 · 24:30R. Hasmanda—1112114113L. Sulava—61481172
R. Hasmanda10
LSep 9 · 01:00M. Novak2.101111133R. Hasmanda1.6785110LSep 8 · 22:00R. Hasmanda1.737690V. Kosar2.001111113LSep 7 · 03:28A. Svoboda1.531112113R. Hasmanda2.3821090LSep 7 · 02:30A. Svoboda1.731312113R. Hasmanda2.00111030WSep 7 · 01:00P. Bruzek2.108311111R. Hasmanda1.6711119133WSep 6 · 23:30R. Hasmanda1.8311811113M. Novak1.83411661WSep 6 · 22:00R. Hasmanda1.441211113L. Sulava2.6310580LSep 3 · 03:28O. Vitrovyj1.5011118113R. Hasmanda2.50851161WSep 3 · 02:00P. Bruzek2.251111141152R. Hasmanda1.577131213113LSep 3 · 24:30R. Hasmanda1.5311810121V. Dolezal2.3861112143
L. Sulava10
LSep 9 · 24:30V. Kosar2.00941111113L. Sulava1.7311113242LSep 8 · 22:30L. Sulava2.0010640M. Novak1.731211113WSep 7 · 02:58L. Sulava2.1011811113M. Novak1.67511961WSep 7 · 02:00P. Bruzek1.9198111252L. Sulava1.801111610113WSep 7 · 24:30L. Sulava2.2014616113M. Novak1.6112111471LSep 6 · 23:00L. Sulava2.636450A. Svoboda1.441111113LSep 6 · 22:00R. Hasmanda1.441211113L. Sulava2.6310580LSep 6 · 13:30M. Barta1.75911911113L. Sulava1.9511711952WSep 6 · 12:30M. Barta1.9177111172L. Sulava1.80111165113WSep 6 · 11:30L. Sulava1.91121168113M. Stefek1.80104111172
Upcoming Matches
R. Hasmanda
L. Sulava
Nothing scheduled
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.