TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Setka CupMatch #13084417
Played Sep 6Finished
Volodymyr Kuzmych
Home
2.63
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
116119115––––
Taras Gil
Away
1.44
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:21 and never touched — 64.5% is still 64.5%
Graded at full timeTaras Gil to win
64.5%
64.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingVolodymyr Kuzmych above · Taras Gil below
Set 1 · 11-6
Set 2 · 11-9
Set 3 · 11-5
Point 53 set 3, 11-5 — our read held Taras Gil at 64.5%
53 points played in total.
H2H Volodymyr Kuzmych 1–1 Taras Gil Dead even across their 2 meetings.
Last 2 · 1–1Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 20:21What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.44 (65%)
Gil
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-1 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Kuzmych 1433 vs Gil 1510
Gil
Wrong
both rated, 77 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Kuzmych 20% vs Gil 80%
Gil
Wrong
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Kuzmych 50% vs Gil 60%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Kuzmych -1 · Gil +4
Gil
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 65% — Clear lean (leans Gil)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Gil form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (69%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsKuzmych 2.63 / Gil 1.44
Signal prob.36% / 65%
Edge (Gil)-0.0pp
Setka Cup · #13084417
Kuzmych2.63
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog48% won 11 of 23
Down 0–1, comes back31% 4 of 13
Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 5
Gil1.44
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite60% won 34 of 57
Up 2–0, closes it90% 18 of 20
Up 1–0, closes it77% 26 of 34
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeKuzmych1wins
AwayGil1wins
Level at 1–1.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home1
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricKuzmychGilK − GBasisWins110in 2 meetingsFirst set110of 2Avg pointsper match32.029.5+2.5per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricKuzmychGilBasisWin rate · lifetime31 / 75 vs 122 / 21241.3%57.6%31 / 75 vs 122 / 212Avg sets wonper match1.82.2per matchAvg pointsper match37.237.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
GilKuzmych 2.63/Gil 1.44
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
64.5%
Gil · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Kuzmych won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
WSep 6 · 05:25V. Kuzmych—1111113T. Gil—6950
LSep 5 · 24:15V. Kuzmych—711491T. Gil—11611113
V. Kuzmych10
WSep 6 · 10:55V. Kuzmych1.57761111113R. Bihun2.2511118532LSep 6 · 08:55M. Slozka1.731111816113V. Kuzmych2.0097111842WSep 6 · 07:55V. Kuzmych1.531112117113O. Sydorchuk2.3821481192LSep 6 · 06:55S. Prus1.83111120113V. Kuzmych1.83882271LSep 5 · 02:15S. Prus2.00117119123V. Kuzmych1.73811811102WSep 5 · 01:15V. Kuzmych1.911211113O. Sydorchuk1.8010890LSep 5 · 24:15V. Kuzmych2.20711491T. Gil1.6111611113LSep 4 · 22:45V. Kuzmych1.834930I. Fashchevskyi1.831111113LSep 4 · 20:45V. Kuzmych1.83881181M. Slozka1.8311115113LAug 29 · 10:25V. Kuzmych1.83661181V. Dobrovolskyi1.8311117113
T. Gil10
WSep 6 · 11:25T. Gil1.611111113O. Sydorchuk2.206690WSep 6 · 09:25S. Prus2.636940T. Gil1.441111113LSep 6 · 07:25M. Slozka2.25111111113T. Gil1.57713851LSep 6 · 06:25T. Gil1.28119111172R. Bihun3.50411138113WSep 5 · 02:45I. Fashchevskyi2.503860T. Gil1.501111113WSep 5 · 01:45M. Slozka2.255111561T. Gil1.5711917113WSep 5 · 24:15V. Kuzmych2.20711491T. Gil1.6111611113WSep 4 · 22:15O. Sydorchuk2.20910111142T. Gil1.61111247113LSep 4 · 20:15S. Prus2.75411311113T. Gil1.4011411882LAug 15 · 17:55O. Gazhula2.001111113T. Gil1.732660
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.