TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Michael Hasman vs Miroslav Vana 1-3 · Setka Cup
Setka Cup
Played Sep 22Finished
Michael Hasman
Home
2.50
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
119311911511––
Miroslav Vana
Away
1.50
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 21:39 and never touched — 62.5% is still 62.5%
Graded at full timeMiroslav Vana to win
62.5%
62.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingMichael Hasman above · Miroslav Vana below
Set 1 · 11-9
Set 2 · 3-11
Set 3 · 9-11
Set 4 · 5-11
Point 70 set 4, 5-11 — our read held Miroslav Vana at 62.5%
70 points played in total.
H2H Michael Hasman 0–3 Miroslav Vana Michael Hasman has won 0 of their 3 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 21:39What took a side6 for · 0 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.50 (63%)
Vana
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-3 in 3
Vana
Correct
gap of 3 in 3, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Hasman 1447 vs Vana 1506
Vana
Correct
both rated, 60 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Hasman 40% vs Vana 60%
Vana
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Hasman 40% vs Vana 60%
Vana
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Hasman -1 · Vana +3
Vana
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
6 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 63% — Clear lean (leans Vana)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsHasman 2.50 / Vana 1.50
Signal prob.38% / 63%
Edge (Vana)+0.0pp
Setka Cup · #13173364
Hasman2.50
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog50% won 23 of 46
Down 0–1, comes back26% 6 of 23
Down 0–2, comes back7% 1 of 14
Vana1.50
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Last match: today
Won last 3
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite60% won 48 of 80
Up 2–0, closes it95% 20 of 21
Up 1–0, closes it75% 38 of 51
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 3 meetings
HomeHasman0wins
AwayVana3wins
2 of 3 to a deciderVana leads 3–0, and 2 of those 3 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 3 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Hasman1Vana2n = 3Vana took 2 of 3
S2Hasman2Vana1n = 3Hasman took 2 of 3
S3Hasman0Vana3n = 3Vana took 3 of 3
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 3 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 3 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away267%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away133%
These 3 meetings
MetricHasmanVanaH − VBasisWins03−3in 3 meetingsFirst set12−1of 3Avg pointsper match37.042.7−5.7per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHasmanVanaBasisWin rate · lifetime69 / 125 vs 187 / 35255.2%53.1%69 / 125 vs 187 / 352Avg sets wonper match2.22.1per matchAvg pointsper match38.439.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
VanaHasman 2.50/Vana 1.50
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
62.5%
Vana · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Vana won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record3
LJul 10 · 11:00M. Hasman279990M. Vana331111113
LJun 23 · 09:15M. Hasman4011118462M. Vana50891111113
LJun 10 · 06:00M. Hasman4481151192M. Vana45117115113
M. Hasman10
LSep 22 · 15:30M. Hasman1.8398110K. Polak1.831111133LSep 22 · 13:30M. Hasman1.837290O. Plyska1.831111113WSep 16 · 12:29M. Melisek1.916101111102M. Hasman1.80111268123LSep 16 · 11:30M. Hasman1.80412691M. Melisek1.91111011113WSep 16 · 10:30M. Hasman2.001022811113M. Vorel1.73122011722LSep 16 · 09:30M. Hasman1.5359111172A. Dvoracek2.38111166113LSep 9 · 08:18A. Dvoracek2.7511715113M. Hasman1.409111331WSep 9 · 07:15M. Hasman2.0011411113T. Bertho1.73711971LSep 9 · 06:15M. Hasman1.73691171M. Vorel2.0011116113WSep 9 · 05:15M. Hasman1.501113113A. Dvoracek2.5061170
M. Vana10
WSep 22 · 14:00K. Polak2.251221091M. Vana1.57101112113WSep 21 · 20:33M. Vana1.57111169113J. Vasek2.2567111132WSep 21 · 19:30J. Vasek2.00851261M. Vana1.73111110113LSep 21 · 19:00M. Vana1.9171060O. Plyska1.801112113LSep 21 · 18:00M. Vana2.2510870L. Tuma1.571211113WSep 19 · 11:15T. Hanke1.5741090M. Vana2.251112113WSep 19 · 10:45M. Vana1.91611136133O. Plyska1.801171111112LSep 19 · 09:45M. Vana1.83116461T. Bertho1.8361111113WSep 9 · 20:39M. Vana1.50111110113J. Hanacek2.50371281LSep 9 · 20:00J. Mejzlik3.004111311113M. Vana1.36119111382
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.