Ihor Kvak vs Taras Gil 0-3

TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup

Setka CupMatch #13155048

Played Sep 19Finished

Ihor Kvak

Home

3.50

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

4–6Last 10Won last 1

Final

0 – 3

Set by set

911711311––––

Taras Gil

Away

1.29

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

6–4Last 10Won last 1

The read, and what happenedsealed at 18:22 and never touched — 63.4% is still 63.4%

Graded at full time

Taras Gil to win

63.4%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is goingIhor Kvak above · Taras Gil below

Set 1 · 9-11

Set 2 · 7-11

Set 3 · 3-11

Point 52 set 3, 3-11 — our read held Taras Gil at 63.4%

52 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 18:22

What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.28 (73%)

Gil

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Kvak 1446 vs Gil 1568

Gil

Correct

both rated, 123 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Kvak 60% vs Gil 40%

Kvak

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Kvak 40% vs Gil 60%

Gil

Correct

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Kvak +1 · Gil +1

—

Too close

neither holds a run of 3 on their own

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 73% — Strong (leans Gil) · live re-read · sealed at 63% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Gil form (40%) is below what odds imply (78%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsKvak 3.50 / Gil 1.28

Signal prob.27% / 73%

Edge (Gil)-0.0pp

Setka Cup · #13155048

Kvak3.50

40%won 4 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

oldest → newest

60%takes the first set · 6 of 10

As underdog44% won 8 of 18

Down 0–1, comes back25% 2 of 8

Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 6

Gil1.28

60%won 6 of 10 · last 10

Last match: today

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As favourite59% won 41 of 70

Up 2–0, closes it92% 24 of 26

Up 1–0, closes it78% 32 of 41

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricKvakGilBasisWin rate · lifetime34 / 63 vs 124 / 21854%56.9%34 / 63 vs 124 / 218Avg sets wonper match1.92.2per matchAvg pointsper match34.937.5per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Gil

Kvak 3.50/Gil 1.28

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

73.1%

Gil · sealed before the serve

What happened

0–3

Gil won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

I. Kvak10