TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13083284
Played Sep 6Finished
Jakub Michalczyk
Home
2.50
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
411116118711117
Alan Wos
Away
1.46
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:31 and never touched — 54.9% is still 54.9%
Graded at full timeJakub Michalczyk to win
54.9%
54.9%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
87 points played in total.
Set by set
411116118711117
H2H Jakub Michalczyk 1–1 Alan Wos Dead even across their 2 meetings.
Last 2 · 1–1Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 15:31What took a side1 for · 3 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.46 (63%)
Wos
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-1 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Michalczyk 1414 vs Wos 1559
Wos
Wrong
both rated, 145 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Michalczyk 80% vs Wos 80%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Michalczyk 70% vs Wos 50%
Michalczyk
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Michalczyk +1 · Wos +4
Wos
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
1 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 64% — Clear lean (leans Wos) · live re-read · sealed at 45% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Wos form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (68%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsMichalczyk 2.50 / Wos 1.46
Signal prob.36% / 64%
Edge (Wos)+0.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13083284
Michalczyk2.50
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As underdog38% won 27 of 71
Down 0–1, comes back22% 10 of 46
Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 25
Wos1.46
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite65% won 98 of 150
Up 2–0, closes it95% 37 of 39
Up 1–0, closes it88% 66 of 75
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeMichalczyk1wins
AwayWos1wins
Level at 1–1.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home1
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricMichalczykWosM − WBasisWins110in 2 meetingsFirst set110of 2Avg pointsper match41.042.0−1.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricMichalczykWosBasisWin rate · lifetime185 / 350 vs 264 / 68352.9%38.7%185 / 350 vs 264 / 683Avg sets wonper match2.11.8per matchAvg pointsper match40.236.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
WosMichalczyk 2.50/Wos 1.46
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
63.9%
Wos · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Michalczyk won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LAug 16 · 14:35J. Michalczyk—5129111A. Wos—111011133
WAug 15 · 14:35J. Michalczyk—12913113A. Wos—10111171
J. Michalczyk10
LSep 6 · 19:40J. Michalczyk2.21811981B. Sulkowski1.5711211113WSep 6 · 17:20J. Michalczyk1.90111275113A. Lilien1.80710111182LSep 6 · 16:15M. Trela2.604101111113J. Michalczyk1.4211127772WSep 6 · 15:25J. Michalczyk1.541111108113A. Myszewski2.2569121192WSep 6 · 14:35J. Michalczyk1.6311711113T. Pisarczyk2.10611871WSep 6 · 13:00J. Michalczyk1.791315113M. Zagajewski1.88111330WSep 6 · 11:45J. Michalczyk1.77111120113P. Staniszewski1.90972281LSep 6 · 10:05J. Michalczyk1.9589111162I. Dabrowski1.74111174113LSep 6 · 09:00J. Michalczyk2.153860D. Wasilewski1.631111113WSep 6 · 24:35D. Poloszczanski2.60101380J. Michalczyk1.411215113
A. Wos10
LSep 7 · 24:35A. Wos2.201121111102L. Pietraszko1.61811613123LSep 6 · 23:45D. Jadam1.5011113113A. Wos2.50711161WSep 6 · 22:35A. Wos3.25125117113F. Mlynarski1.33101181162LSep 6 · 21:50K. Kapik1.441111113A. Wos2.638640LSep 6 · 20:05A. Wos1.63115111082A. Lilien2.10911712113WSep 6 · 17:45M. Trela2.851110121062A. Wos1.359121012113WSep 6 · 16:55A. Wos1.361111113A. Myszewski2.805640WSep 6 · 15:50A. Wos1.421511113113B. Sulkowski2.6017761162WSep 6 · 24:10A. Wos2.5011116113D. Jadam1.50851191LSep 5 · 23:20A. Wos2.38101115572T. Filbrandt1.531291311113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.