TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13082610
Played Sep 6Finished
Alan Wos
Home
2.50
At publish
Lost last 4Form at publish
1–9Last 10Lost last 4
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
118115611119––
Dawid Jadam
Away
1.50
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:56 and never touched — 65.4% is still 65.4%
Graded at full timeDawid Jadam to win
65.4%
65.4%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingAlan Wos above · Dawid Jadam below
Set 1 · 11-8
Set 2 · 11-5
Set 3 · 6-11
Set 4 · 11-9
Point 72 set 4, 11-9 — our read held Dawid Jadam at 65.4%
72 points played in total.
H2H Alan Wos 5–8 Dawid Jadam Alan Wos has won 5 of their 13 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 12:56What took a side5 for · 1 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.50 (63%)
Jadam
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
5-8 in 13
Jadam
Wrong
gap of 3 in 13, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Wos 1531 vs Jadam 1656
Jadam
Wrong
both rated, 125 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Wos 20% vs Jadam 40%
Jadam
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Wos 10% vs Jadam 50%
Jadam
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Wos -4 · Jadam +1
Wos
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 66% — Clear lean (leans Jadam)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Jadam form (40%) is below what odds imply (67%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsWos 2.50 / Jadam 1.50
Signal prob.34% / 66%
Edge (Jadam)+3.2pp
TT Elite Series · #13082610
Wos2.50
10%won 1 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 4
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog32% won 93 of 294
Down 0–1, comes back18% 31 of 174
Down 0–2, comes back5% 5 of 96
Jadam1.50
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite62% won 63 of 102
Up 2–0, closes it97% 29 of 30
Up 1–0, closes it86% 42 of 49
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeWos4wins
AwayJadam6wins
5 of 10 to a deciderJadam leads 6–4, and 5 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeWos40%2 of 5
AwayJadam60%3 of 5
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Wos5Jadam5n = 10split evenly
S2Wos6Jadam4n = 10Wos took 6 of 10
S3Wos4Jadam6n = 10Jadam took 6 of 10
S4Wos2Jadam7n = 9Jadam took 7 of 9
S5Wos3Jadam2n = 5Wos took 3 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home330%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away440%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricWosJadamW − JBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set550of 10Avg pointsper match41.543.6−2.1per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricWosJadamBasisWin rate · lifetime260 / 678 vs 149 / 30638.4%48.7%260 / 678 vs 149 / 306Avg sets wonper match1.72.0per matchAvg pointsper match36.137.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
JadamWos 2.50/Jadam 1.50
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
65.7%
Jadam · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Wos won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 5 · 19:15A. Wos—13125592D. Jadam—11101111113
LAug 16 · 19:40A. Wos—1278121D. Jadam—101111143
LAug 15 · 17:20A. Wos—511111182D. Jadam—116139113
LJul 3 · 16:55A. Wos—951171D. Jadam—11119113
WMay 24 · 18:20A. Wos—114811113D. Jadam—71111482
WMay 23 · 17:05A. Wos—611118113D. Jadam—11561192
LApr 4 · 17:05A. Wos—1161141D. Jadam—81113113
WApr 4 · 01:05A. Wos—1111113D. Jadam—6960
LApr 3 · 22:40A. Wos—5111191D. Jadam—11813113
WApr 3 · 20:35A. Wos—13111111153D. Jadam—158513132
A. Wos10
LSep 7 · 24:35A. Wos2.201121111102L. Pietraszko1.61811613123LSep 6 · 23:45D. Jadam1.5011113113A. Wos2.50711161WSep 6 · 22:35A. Wos3.25125117113F. Mlynarski1.33101181162LSep 6 · 21:50K. Kapik1.441111113A. Wos2.638640LSep 6 · 20:05A. Wos1.63115111082A. Lilien2.10911712113LSep 6 · 18:30J. Michalczyk2.50411117113A. Wos1.4611681172WSep 6 · 17:45M. Trela2.851110121062A. Wos1.359121012113WSep 6 · 16:55A. Wos1.361111113A. Myszewski2.805640WSep 6 · 15:50A. Wos1.421511113113B. Sulkowski2.6017761162LSep 5 · 23:20A. Wos2.38101115572T. Filbrandt1.531291311113
D. Jadam10
WSep 7 · 24:10K. Kapik2.251261081D. Jadam1.57101112113WSep 6 · 23:45D. Jadam1.5011113113A. Wos2.50711161WSep 6 · 22:55D. Jadam1.67115811113L. Pietraszko2.1091111792WSep 6 · 21:00D. Jadam1.911311118113F. Mlynarski1.8015941172WSep 6 · 19:40D. Jadam1.61178912113J. Zochniak2.201511111092LSep 6 · 18:30D. Jadam1.67105120L. Pietraszko2.101211143LSep 6 · 17:20D. Jadam2.3881141172J. Kuzmicz1.53117118113LSep 6 · 16:05F. Mlynarski1.4411812113D. Jadam2.638111011LSep 6 · 15:25D. Jadam1.6766100K. Kapik2.101111113WSep 5 · 23:45D. Jadam1.911111113P. Jendrzejewski1.805980
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.