TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13081943
Played Sep 5Finished
Alan Wos
Home
2.50
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Won last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
13111210511511911
Dawid Jadam
Away
1.50
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:50 and never touched — 56.3% is still 56.3%
Graded at full timeDawid Jadam to win
56.3%
56.3%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingAlan Wos above · Dawid Jadam below
Set 1 · 13-11
Set 2 · 12-10
Set 3 · 5-11
Set 4 · 5-11
Set 5 · 9-11
Point 98 set 5, 9-11 — our read held Dawid Jadam at 56.3%
98 points played in total.
H2H Alan Wos 5–7 Dawid Jadam Alan Wos has won 5 of their 12 meetings.
Last 10 · 5–5Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 09:50What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.50 (63%)
Jadam
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
5-7 in 12
Jadam
Correct
gap of 2 in 12, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Wos 1593 vs Jadam 1677
Jadam
Correct
both rated, 85 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Wos 20% vs Jadam 60%
Jadam
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Wos 30% vs Jadam 50%
Jadam
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Wos +1 · Jadam -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 66% — Clear lean (leans Jadam) · live re-read · sealed at 56% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Wos form (20%) is below what odds imply (40%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsWos 2.50 / Jadam 1.50
Signal prob.34% / 66%
Edge (Jadam)+3.2pp
TT Elite Series · #13081943
Wos2.50
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog32% won 93 of 294
Down 0–1, comes back18% 31 of 174
Down 0–2, comes back5% 5 of 96
Jadam1.50
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite62% won 63 of 102
Up 2–0, closes it97% 29 of 30
Up 1–0, closes it86% 42 of 49
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeWos5wins
AwayJadam5wins
4 of 10 to a deciderLevel at 5–5, and 4 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeWos60%3 of 5
AwayJadam60%3 of 5
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Wos5Jadam5n = 10split evenly
S2Wos5Jadam5n = 10split evenly
S3Wos5Jadam5n = 10split evenly
S4Wos3Jadam6n = 9Jadam took 6 of 9
S5Wos3Jadam1n = 4Wos took 3 of 4
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home110%
3–2Decider, home330%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away440%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricWosJadamW − JBasisWins550in 10 meetingsFirst set550of 10Avg pointsper match41.742.4−0.7per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricWosJadamBasisWin rate · lifetime259 / 673 vs 147 / 30138.5%48.8%259 / 673 vs 147 / 301Avg sets wonper match1.72.0per matchAvg pointsper match36.137.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
JadamWos 2.50/Jadam 1.50
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
65.7%
Jadam · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Jadam won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 16 · 19:40A. Wos—1278121D. Jadam—101111143
LAug 15 · 17:20A. Wos—511111182D. Jadam—116139113
LJul 3 · 16:55A. Wos—951171D. Jadam—11119113
WMay 24 · 18:20A. Wos—114811113D. Jadam—71111482
WMay 23 · 17:05A. Wos—611118113D. Jadam—11561192
LApr 4 · 17:05A. Wos—1161141D. Jadam—81113113
WApr 4 · 01:05A. Wos—1111113D. Jadam—6960
LApr 3 · 22:40A. Wos—5111191D. Jadam—11813113
WApr 3 · 20:35A. Wos—13111111153D. Jadam—158513132
WMar 29 · 13:25A. Wos—11811163D. Jadam—8119141
A. Wos10
LSep 7 · 24:35A. Wos2.201121111102L. Pietraszko1.61811613123LSep 6 · 23:45D. Jadam1.5011113113A. Wos2.50711161WSep 6 · 22:35A. Wos3.25125117113F. Mlynarski1.33101181162LSep 6 · 21:50K. Kapik1.441111113A. Wos2.638640LSep 6 · 20:05A. Wos1.63115111082A. Lilien2.10911712113LSep 6 · 18:30J. Michalczyk2.50411117113A. Wos1.4611681172WSep 6 · 17:45M. Trela2.851110121062A. Wos1.359121012113WSep 6 · 16:55A. Wos1.361111113A. Myszewski2.805640WSep 6 · 15:50A. Wos1.421511113113B. Sulkowski2.6017761162WSep 6 · 24:10A. Wos2.5011116113D. Jadam1.50851191
D. Jadam10
WSep 7 · 24:10K. Kapik2.251261081D. Jadam1.57101112113WSep 6 · 23:45D. Jadam1.5011113113A. Wos2.50711161WSep 6 · 22:55D. Jadam1.67115811113L. Pietraszko2.1091111792WSep 6 · 21:00D. Jadam1.911311118113F. Mlynarski1.8015941172WSep 6 · 19:40D. Jadam1.61178912113J. Zochniak2.201511111092LSep 6 · 18:30D. Jadam1.67105120L. Pietraszko2.101211143LSep 6 · 17:20D. Jadam2.3881141172J. Kuzmicz1.53117118113LSep 6 · 16:05F. Mlynarski1.4411812113D. Jadam2.638111011LSep 6 · 15:25D. Jadam1.6766100K. Kapik2.101111113LSep 6 · 24:10A. Wos2.5011116113D. Jadam1.50851191
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.