TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13065217
Played Sep 3Finished
Marek Sedlak
Home
1.91
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
4116111171113––
Daniel Tuma
Away
1.80
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
9–1Last 10Won last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 13:33 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeDaniel Tuma to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingMarek Sedlak above · Daniel Tuma below
Set 1 · 4-11
Set 2 · 6-11
Set 3 · 11-7
Set 4 · 11-13
Point 74 set 4, 11-13 — our read held Daniel Tuma at 54.0%
74 points played in total.
H2H Marek Sedlak 0–2 Daniel Tuma Marek Sedlak has won 0 of their 2 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 13:33What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.80 (51%)
Tuma
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-2 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Sedlak 1451 vs Tuma 1667
Tuma
Correct
both rated, 216 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Sedlak 40% vs Tuma 80%
Tuma
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Sedlak 30% vs Tuma 90%
Tuma
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Sedlak -1 · Tuma +4
Tuma
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Tuma)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Tuma form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (56%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsSedlak 1.91 / Tuma 1.80
Signal prob.46% / 54%
Edge (Tuma)+2.5pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13065217
Sedlak1.91
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
10%takes the first set · 1 of 10
As underdog
Fewer than 10 matches in this role
Tuma1.80
90%won 9 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As favourite59% won 148 of 249
Up 2–0, closes it93% 70 of 75
Up 1–0, closes it76% 112 of 147
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeSedlak0wins
AwayTuma2wins
1 of 2 to a deciderTuma leads 2–0, and 1 of those 2 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away1
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
These 2 meetings
MetricSedlakTumaS − TBasisWins02−2in 2 meetingsFirst set110of 2Avg pointsper match38.046.5−8.5per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricSedlakTumaBasisWin rate · lifetime73 / 144 vs 777 / 148150.7%52.5%73 / 144 vs 777 / 1481Avg sets wonper match2.02.1per matchAvg pointsper match37.338.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
TumaSedlak 1.91/Tuma 1.80
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
54%
Tuma · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Tuma won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LSep 3 · 20:00M. Sedlak—4611111D. Tuma—11117133
LAug 20 · 16:00M. Sedlak—11671282D. Tuma—8111110113
M. Sedlak10
LSep 5 · 09:00M. Sedlak3.252690T. Holik1.331111113LSep 5 · 08:00T. Holik1.831191011223M. Sedlak1.83811125202WSep 5 · 07:00J. Svoboda2.2010111081M. Sedlak1.6112412113LSep 5 · 06:30M. Sedlak1.806780R. Pavelka1.911111113WSep 3 · 21:00M. Sedlak1.611211113T. Vinter2.2010990LSep 3 · 19:30V. Postelt2.381111113M. Sedlak1.535560WSep 3 · 18:00M. Sedlak1.80121111113T. Vinter1.911013251LAug 26 · 16:58M. Sedlak1.806760M. Vizek1.911111113LAug 26 · 16:30M. Sedlak1.80101411101J. Stolfa1.9112169123WAug 26 · 15:00M. Sedlak1.83661211113M. Vizek1.83111110982
D. Tuma10
WSep 3 · 21:30D. Tuma1.521111113V. Postelt2.356960WSep 3 · 19:00T. Vinter1.9141181182D. Tuma1.80111119113WSep 3 · 18:30D. Tuma1.40111212113V. Postelt2.757101481WSep 3 · 17:30D. Tuma1.73151110113M. Sobisek2.001351271WSep 3 · 16:00D. Tuma1.911111113J. Stolfa1.809770LSep 3 · 15:30M. Sobisek2.00118119133D. Tuma1.73411711112WSep 3 · 14:00D. Tuma2.008111510113J. Hradecky1.73118131252WSep 1 · 21:28D. Tuma1.91128511113K. Kapras1.80101111492WSep 1 · 20:30D. Tuma2.20117117113K. Kapras1.6141161152WSep 1 · 19:00D. Tuma1.831113113S. Kadavy1.8391180
Upcoming Matches
M. Sedlak
D. Tuma
Nothing scheduled
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.