TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13003396
Played Aug 25Finished
Vladimir Adamczyk
Home
1.83
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
411118411811––
Daniel Langer
Away
1.83
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
8–2Last 10Lost last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 15:03 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeDaniel Langer to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingVladimir Adamczyk above · Daniel Langer below
Set 1 · 4-11
Set 2 · 11-8
Set 3 · 4-11
Set 4 · 8-11
Point 68 set 4, 8-11 — our read held Daniel Langer at 54.0%
68 points played in total.
H2H Vladimir Adamczyk 0–1 Daniel Langer Vladimir Adamczyk has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 15:03What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.83 (50%)
Langer
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-1 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Adamczyk 1568 vs Langer 1686
Langer
Correct
both rated, 119 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Adamczyk 20% vs Langer 60%
Langer
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Adamczyk 50% vs Langer 80%
Langer
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Adamczyk +1 · Langer -1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 57% — Slight lean (leans Langer) · live re-read · sealed at 54% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Adamczyk form (20%) is below what odds imply (55%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAdamczyk 1.83 / Langer 1.83
Signal prob.43% / 57%
Edge (Langer)+7.0pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13003396
Adamczyk1.83
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
Langer1.83
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeAdamczyk0wins
AwayLanger1wins
Langer leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
This 1 meeting
MetricAdamczykLangerA − LBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set01−1of 1Avg pointsper match27.041.0−14.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAdamczykLangerBasisWin rate · lifetime101 / 183 vs 83 / 11455.2%72.8%101 / 183 vs 83 / 114Avg sets wonper match2.12.5per matchAvg pointsper match38.738.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
LangerAdamczyk 1.83/Langer 1.83
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
57%
Langer · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Langer won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
LAug 25 · 20:00V. Adamczyk—411481D. Langer—11811113
V. Adamczyk10
WAug 25 · 21:05V. Adamczyk2.2591111113R. Vavrecka1.57116271WAug 25 · 19:30R. Vavrecka1.8381191192V. Adamczyk1.83116114113LAug 25 · 18:00V. Adamczyk2.0051112862J. Schwan1.731191011113LAug 24 · 08:58D. Oborny1.73111210113V. Adamczyk2.007101281LAug 24 · 08:30V. Adamczyk1.61451161D. Oborny2.2011118113LAug 24 · 07:00V. Adamczyk1.914850A. Walek1.801111113WAug 24 · 06:00D. Heczko2.10811891V. Adamczyk1.6711711113LAug 19 · 21:30V. Adamczyk1.39125811J. Hutnik2.55101111113WAug 19 · 20:00V. Adamczyk2.201411113J. Hutnik1.6112670WAug 19 · 19:30M. Heczko2.5061113642V. Adamczyk1.501151111113
D. Langer10
LSep 6 · 17:29D. Langer1.8016711972R. Skacelik1.911411911113WSep 6 · 16:30D. Langer1.67111138113J. Levicky2.1031111142WSep 6 · 15:00D. Langer1.9114511113J. Schwan1.801211561WSep 6 · 14:00R. Skacelik1.6741171162D. Langer2.10115116113WSep 5 · 13:04D. Heczko3.257240D. Langer1.331111113WSep 5 · 12:30D. Langer1.91791111113A. Walek1.8011116972LSep 5 · 11:00D. Langer1.8016911562D. Heczko1.911411711113LSep 5 · 10:00M. Bereiter1.5315118113D. Langer2.381321161WSep 2 · 17:30A. Walek1.61115581D. Langer2.0561111113LSep 2 · 16:30A. Walek1.7311911113D. Langer2.00711971
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.