Ladislav Tuma vs Milos Soukup 2-3

TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup

Setka CupMatch #13131391

Played Sep 15Finished

Ladislav Tuma

Home

1.91

At publish

Won last 2

Form at publish

7–3Last 10Won last 2

Final

2 – 3

Set by set

411115411119211

Milos Soukup

Away

1.80

At publish

Lost last 3

Form at publish

3–7Last 10Lost last 3

The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:51 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%

Graded at full time

Milos Soukup to win

54.0%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is goingLadislav Tuma above · Milos Soukup below

Set 1 · 4-11

Set 2 · 11-5

Set 3 · 4-11

Set 4 · 11-9

Set 5 · 2-11

Point 79 set 5, 2-11 — our read held Milos Soukup at 54.0%

79 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 20:51

What took a side2 for · 3 against · 1 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.80 (51%)

Soukup

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Tuma 1503 vs Soukup 1438

Tuma

Wrong

both rated, 65 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Tuma 80% vs Soukup 40%

Tuma

Wrong

40pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Tuma 70% vs Soukup 30%

Tuma

Wrong

40pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Tuma +2 · Soukup -3

Soukup

Correct

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

2 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Soukup)

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Soukup form (40%) is below what odds imply (56%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsTuma 1.91 / Soukup 1.80

Signal prob.46% / 54%

Edge (Soukup)+2.5pp

Setka Cup · #13131391

Tuma1.91

70%won 7 of 10 · last 10

Won last 2

oldest → newest

60%takes the first set · 6 of 10

As underdog43% won 38 of 88

Down 0–1, comes back21% 9 of 44

Down 0–2, comes back4% 1 of 25

Soukup1.80

30%won 3 of 10 · last 10

Lost last 3

oldest → newest

30%takes the first set · 3 of 10

As favourite47% won 14 of 30

Up 2–0, closes it100% 7 of 7

Up 1–0, closes it71% 10 of 14

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricTumaSoukupBasisWin rate · lifetime239 / 473 vs 30 / 7150.5%42.3%239 / 473 vs 30 / 71Avg sets wonper match2.11.9per matchAvg pointsper match38.737.8per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Soukup

Tuma 1.91/Soukup 1.80

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

54%

Soukup · sealed before the serve

What happened

2–3

Soukup won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

L. Tuma10