TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13112027
Played Sep 11Finished
Bartlomiej Mleczko
Home
2.15
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
411117911114911
Bartosz Czerwinski
Away
1.63
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 24:36 and never touched — 55.6% is still 55.6%
Graded at full timeBartlomiej Mleczko to win
55.6%
55.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
88 points played in total.
Set by set
411117911114911
H2H Bartlomiej Mleczko 1–1 Bartosz Czerwinski Dead even across their 2 meetings.
Last 2 · 1–1Head to head
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 24:36What took a side0 for · 3 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.63 (57%)
Czerwinski
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-1 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Mleczko 1483 vs Czerwinski 1484
Czerwinski
Correct
both rated, 0 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Mleczko 40% vs Czerwinski 60%
Czerwinski
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Mleczko 50% vs Czerwinski 50%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Mleczko -1 · Czerwinski +2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
0 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 57% — Slight lean (leans Czerwinski) · live re-read · sealed at 44% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsMleczko 2.15 / Czerwinski 1.63
Signal prob.43% / 57%
Edge (Czerwinski)+0.0pp
TT Elite Series · #13112027
Mleczko2.15
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog42% won 54 of 129
Down 0–1, comes back26% 19 of 74
Down 0–2, comes back9% 3 of 35
Czerwinski1.63
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite60% won 77 of 129
Up 2–0, closes it100% 32 of 32
Up 1–0, closes it82% 55 of 67
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeMleczko1wins
AwayCzerwinski1wins
1 of 2 to a deciderLevel at 1–1, and 1 of those 2 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home1
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away1
These 2 meetings
MetricMleczkoCzerwinskiM − CBasisWins110in 2 meetingsFirst set02−2of 2Avg pointsper match39.044.0−5.0per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricMleczkoCzerwinskiBasisWin rate · lifetime425 / 813 vs 496 / 106252.3%46.7%425 / 813 vs 496 / 1062Avg sets wonper match2.11.9per matchAvg pointsper match38.737.9per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
CzerwinskiMleczko 2.15/Czerwinski 1.63
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
56.9%
Czerwinski · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Czerwinski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
WJun 2 · 06:05B. Mleczko—712148133B. Czerwinski—11101211112
LMay 18 · 04:55B. Mleczko—8880B. Czerwinski—1111113
B. Mleczko10
LSep 11 · 13:05B. Sulkowski1.8591113113B. Mleczko1.851151171WSep 11 · 12:15B. Mleczko1.6912111111143M. Zagajewski1.96147713122LSep 11 · 09:50M. Misiak1.95116411133B. Mleczko1.74911117112LSep 11 · 08:30D. Solilo1.601111113B. Mleczko2.106770WSep 11 · 07:15B. Mleczko1.8361111113A. Linek1.86118971WSep 11 · 06:00B. Sulkowski1.9311911562B. Mleczko1.78711911113LSep 11 · 04:50D. Kosmal1.2811128113B. Mleczko3.157101181LSep 11 · 03:20K. Wisniewski1.241311113113B. Mleczko3.4015671172LAug 31 · 14:40G. Kesik1.7013511113B. Mleczko1.951111751WAug 31 · 13:30B. Mleczko2.0091111123M. Minda1.701186101
B. Czerwinski10
WSep 11 · 11:25R. Stapor1.858970B. Czerwinski1.801111113WSep 11 · 09:00B. Sulkowski2.201151181B. Czerwinski1.5871113113WSep 10 · 14:40M. Misiak2.40511741B. Czerwinski1.5011811113LSep 10 · 13:30B. Czerwinski1.9011118762D. Solilo1.76591111113LSep 10 · 12:15P. Blocho2.01119115143B. Czerwinski1.66511411122WSep 10 · 11:00B. Sulkowski2.0091351192B. Czerwinski1.701111117113LSep 10 · 09:25A. Linek2.3211812133B. Czerwinski1.4971110111WSep 9 · 08:30M. Minda1.85781191B. Czerwinski1.8511117113WSep 9 · 07:15B. Czerwinski1.8041113113R. Stapor1.911141181LSep 9 · 06:00D. Solilo1.8581111113B. Czerwinski1.85115861
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.