TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13103220
Played Sep 10Finished
Adam Linek
Home
2.32
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
11781112101311––
Bartosz Czerwinski
Away
1.49
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:18 and never touched — 63.2% is still 63.2%
Graded at full timeBartosz Czerwinski to win
63.2%
63.2%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
83 points played in total.
Set by set
11781112101311––
H2H Adam Linek 1–5 Bartosz Czerwinski Adam Linek has won 1 of their 6 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 09:18What took a side3 for · 0 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.49 (61%)
Czerwinski
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
1-5 in 6
Czerwinski
Wrong
gap of 4 in 6, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Linek 1460 vs Czerwinski 1477
Czerwinski
Wrong
both rated, 18 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Linek 60% vs Czerwinski 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Linek 50% vs Czerwinski 50%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Linek +1 · Czerwinski +2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 63% — Clear lean (leans Czerwinski) · live re-read · sealed at 63% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Linek form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (43%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsLinek 2.32 / Czerwinski 1.49
Signal prob.38% / 63%
Edge (Czerwinski)+1.6pp
TT Elite Series · #13103220
Linek2.32
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog42% won 162 of 390
Down 0–1, comes back26% 57 of 218
Down 0–2, comes back6% 6 of 104
Czerwinski1.49
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite60% won 75 of 125
Up 2–0, closes it100% 32 of 32
Up 1–0, closes it82% 53 of 65
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 6 meetings
HomeLinek1wins
AwayCzerwinski5wins
1 of 6 to a deciderCzerwinski leads 5–1, and 1 of those 6 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeLinekn = 2, below the 3 needed
AwayCzerwinski100%4 of 4
Set by set, in these 6 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Linek2Czerwinski4n = 6Czerwinski took 4 of 6
S2Linek2Czerwinski4n = 6Czerwinski took 4 of 6
S3Linek2Czerwinski4n = 6Czerwinski took 4 of 6
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 6 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 6 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home117%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away117%
1–3Four sets, away117%
0–3Straight, away350%
These 6 meetings
MetricLinekCzerwinskiL − CBasisWins15−4in 6 meetingsFirst set24−2of 6Avg pointsper match31.238.0−6.8per matchSweeps13−23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricLinekCzerwinskiBasisWin rate · lifetime777 / 1670 vs 495 / 106546.5%46.5%777 / 1670 vs 495 / 1065Avg sets wonper match1.91.9per matchAvg pointsper match37.737.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
CzerwinskiLinek 2.32/Czerwinski 1.49
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
62.5%
Czerwinski · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Linek won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record6
WAug 25 · 09:25A. Linek—1211113B. Czerwinski—10590
LMay 29 · 04:10A. Linek—9780B. Czerwinski—1111113
LNov 17 · 06:20A. Linek—11513292B. Czerwinski—7111111113
LSep 11 · 10:20A. Linek—512120B. Czerwinski—1114143
LMar 21 · 08:55A. Linek—11750B. Czerwinski—1311113
LFeb 14 · 15:25A. Linek—1014851B. Czerwinski—121211113
A. Linek10
LSep 10 · 11:25A. Linek2.331014113102D. Solilo1.491212511123WSep 10 · 10:10M. Misiak1.9011860A. Linek1.741311113WSep 10 · 07:40B. Sulkowski1.8081181292A. Linek1.851171110113LSep 10 · 06:55D. Kosmal1.261111113A. Linek3.258770LSep 10 · 06:15A. Linek2.073790P. Blocho1.621111113WSep 10 · 04:20A. Linek1.831113116113R. Stapor1.8171571192WSep 10 · 03:40F. Krcil1.80111171152A. Linek1.86813115113LSep 8 · 08:35J. Glanowski1.901523911173A. Linek1.801325118152WSep 8 · 07:20A. Linek1.75101111143A. Myszewski1.981289121LSep 8 · 06:05D. Wrobel2.35911113113A. Linek1.5011681182
B. Czerwinski10
WSep 10 · 11:00B. Sulkowski2.0091351192B. Czerwinski1.701111117113WSep 9 · 08:30M. Minda1.85781191B. Czerwinski1.8511117113WSep 9 · 07:15B. Czerwinski1.8041113113R. Stapor1.911141181LSep 9 · 06:00D. Solilo1.8581111113B. Czerwinski1.85115861LSep 9 · 04:50P. Blocho1.751161111123B. Czerwinski1.95611713102WSep 9 · 03:20B. Sulkowski2.301051181B. Czerwinski1.5512118113LSep 8 · 07:40B. Czerwinski1.85891281S. Brud1.85111110113WSep 8 · 06:25B. Czerwinski1.901121011113M. Minda1.8091112782LSep 8 · 05:15B. Czerwinski1.75871481A. Lilien1.95111112113WSep 8 · 04:00A. Sobel1.80114751B. Czerwinski1.9071111113
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.