Marek Dlask vs Radek Zeman 3-0

TT Lossbeater/TT Cup

TT CupMatch #13111582

Played Sep 10Finished

Marek Dlask

Home

1.92

At publish

Lost last 1

Form at publish

4–6Last 10Lost last 1

Final

3 – 0

Set by set

1171210118––––

Radek Zeman

Away

1.78

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

4–6Last 10Won last 1

The read, and what happenedsealed at 21:26 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%

Graded at full time

Marek Dlask to win

54.0%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is goingMarek Dlask above · Radek Zeman below

Set 1 · 11-7

Set 2 · 12-10

Set 3 · 11-8

Point 59 set 3, 11-8 — our read held Marek Dlask at 54.0%

59 points played in total.

H2H Marek Dlask 43–43 Radek Zeman Dead even across their 86 meetings.

Last 10 · 5–5Head to head

Same-day rematch · 3h before this match

Dlask beat Zeman 3-2.

Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically — the market typically prices this in. Which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 21:26

What took a side1 for · 1 against · 4 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.78 (52%)

Zeman

Wrong

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

43-43 in 86

—

Too close

gap of 0, under the gap of 2

Rating (G2)

Dlask 1473 vs Zeman 1374

Dlask

Correct

both rated, 98 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Dlask 60% vs Zeman 60%

—

Too close

0pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Dlask 40% vs Zeman 40%

—

Too close

0pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Streak

Dlask -1 · Zeman +1

—

Too close

neither holds a run of 3 on their own

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

1 for, 4 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Zeman) · live re-read · sealed at 46% before the first serve

Decision Summary

Market vs Signals

Market oddsDlask 1.92 / Zeman 1.78

Signal prob.46% / 54%

Edge (Zeman)+2.1pp

TT Cup · #13111582

Dlask1.92

40%won 4 of 10 · last 10

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As underdog45% won 29 of 64

Down 0–1, comes back37% 13 of 35

Down 0–2, comes back22% 5 of 23

Zeman1.78

40%won 4 of 10 · last 10

oldest → newest

30%takes the first set · 3 of 10

As favourite62% won 107 of 174

Up 2–0, closes it88% 63 of 72

Up 1–0, closes it75% 83 of 111

Head to head

H2H window

The recordacross 10 meetings

HomeDlask5wins

AwayZeman5wins

6 of 10 to a deciderLevel at 5–5, and 6 of those 10 went to a fifth set.

First set to match win · in this matchup

HomeDlask100%4 of 4

AwayZeman83.3%5 of 6

Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one

S1Dlask4Zeman6n = 10Zeman took 6 of 10

S2Dlask4Zeman6n = 10Zeman took 6 of 10

S3Dlask1Zeman9n = 10Zeman took 9 of 10

S4Dlask5Zeman3n = 8Dlask took 5 of 8

S5Dlask5Zeman1n = 6Dlask took 5 of 6

How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code

3–0Straight, home00%

3–1Four sets, home00%

3–2Decider, home550%

2–3Decider, away110%

1–3Four sets, away220%

0–3Straight, away220%

These 10 meetings

MetricDlaskZemanD − ZBasisWins550in 10 meetingsFirst set46−2of 10Avg pointsper match37.341.5−4.2per matchSweeps02−23–0 or 0–3

Career, not this matchup

MetricDlaskZemanBasisWin rate · lifetime145 / 302 vs 319 / 61148%52.2%145 / 302 vs 319 / 611Avg sets wonper match1.92.1per matchAvg pointsper match38.137.5per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Zeman

Dlask 1.92/Zeman 1.78

Read onlywould have missed

What we said

54%

Zeman · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–0

Dlask won

Recent Results

H2H · no odds on record10

WSep 10 · 19:20M. Dlask—114611113R. Zeman—81111652

LAug 26 · 19:20M. Dlask—261181R. Zeman—11118113

LAug 25 · 21:25M. Dlask—61171182R. Zeman—118116113

WAug 25 · 18:50M. Dlask—111176133R. Zeman—691111112

LAug 19 · 21:58M. Dlask—611821R. Zeman—11511113

WAug 19 · 18:50M. Dlask—118411163R. Zeman—611117142

WAug 13 · 19:55M. Dlask—311611113R. Zeman—11911792

LAug 10 · 20:50M. Dlask—38110R. Zeman—1111133

LAug 4 · 21:23M. Dlask—68100R. Zeman—1111123

WAug 4 · 18:50M. Dlask—117711113R. Zeman—31111642

M. Dlask10

LSep 10 · 20:20M. Dlask1.579151381J. Rolik2.25111315113 WSep 10 · 19:20M. Dlask2.10114611113R. Zeman1.6781111652 WSep 10 · 18:20M. Dlask1.67121169113M. Nemec2.10109111152 LAug 31 · 21:30M. Dlask1.60111241182Z. Dusek2.20714119113 WAug 31 · 20:20S. Matousch1.6712991182M. Dlask2.101011113113 LAug 31 · 19:50Z. Dusek1.5011119113M. Dlask2.50661161 LAug 31 · 18:50M. Dlask3.001112541L. Vich1.3651411113 WAug 26 · 21:20M. Dlask1.67119811113M. Nemec2.1091111972 LAug 26 · 20:20M. Dlask1.5789100J. Rolik2.251111123 LAug 26 · 19:20M. Dlask2.20261181R. Zeman1.6111118113

R. Zeman10

WSep 10 · 20:50R. Zeman1.441114123M. Nemec2.63612100 LSep 10 · 19:20M. Dlask2.10114611113R. Zeman1.6781111652 WSep 10 · 18:50J. Rolik2.388460R. Zeman1.531111113 LSep 7 · 21:20R. Zeman2.025740P. Cibik1.701111113 WSep 7 · 20:20P. Cibik1.611111103122R. Zeman2.20871211143 LSep 7 · 19:50L. Vich1.611111113R. Zeman2.206640 LSep 7 · 18:50R. Zeman2.7581070Z. Vyskocil1.401112113 WSep 6 · 13:24M. Nemec2.457960R. Zeman1.48111183 LSep 6 · 12:20R. Zeman2.1071260Z. Vyskocil1.671114113 WAug 26 · 19:20M. Dlask2.20261181R. Zeman1.6111118113

Event Chatroom

This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.