TT Lossbeater/TT Cup
TT CupMatch #13101072
Played Sep 8Finished
Jaromir Zlamal
Home
1.60
At publish
Won last 6Form at publish
8–2Last 10Won last 6
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1171311117––––
Petr Silhan
Away
2.20
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 21:57 and never touched — 58.8% is still 58.8%
Graded at full timeJaromir Zlamal to win
58.8%
58.8%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingJaromir Zlamal above · Petr Silhan below
Set 1 · 11-7
Set 2 · 13-11
Set 3 · 11-7
Point 60 set 3, 11-7 — our read held Jaromir Zlamal at 58.8%
60 points played in total.
H2H Jaromir Zlamal 32–23 Petr Silhan Petr Silhan has won 23 of their 55 meetings.
Same-day rematch · 4h before this match
Zlamal beat Silhan 3-2.
Same-day rematch winners hit ~50% historically — the market typically prices this in. Which is why it moves nothing in the read below: it is context, not a signal.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 21:57What took a side6 for · 0 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.60 (58%)
Zlamal
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
32-23 in 55
Zlamal
Correct
gap of 9 in 55, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Zlamal 1882 vs Silhan 1786
Zlamal
Correct
both rated, 97 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Zlamal 100% vs Silhan 60%
Zlamal
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Zlamal 80% vs Silhan 50%
Zlamal
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Zlamal +5 · Silhan +2
Zlamal
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
6 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 58% — Slight lean (leans Zlamal) · live re-read · sealed at 59% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Silhan form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (45%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsZlamal 1.60 / Silhan 2.20
Signal prob.58% / 42%
Edge (Zlamal)+0.4pp
TT Cup · #13101072
Zlamal1.60
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
Won last 6
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite60% won 83 of 139
Up 2–0, closes it98% 47 of 48
Up 1–0, closes it87% 61 of 70
Silhan2.20
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog42% won 20 of 48
Down 0–1, comes back13% 3 of 24
Down 0–2, comes back8% 1 of 13
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeZlamal7wins
AwaySilhan3wins
4 of 10 to a deciderZlamal leads 7–3, and 4 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeZlamal100%6 of 6
AwaySilhan75%3 of 4
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Zlamal6Silhan4n = 10Zlamal took 6 of 10
S2Zlamal6Silhan4n = 10Zlamal took 6 of 10
S3Zlamal7Silhan3n = 10Zlamal took 7 of 10
S4Zlamal4Silhan2n = 6Zlamal took 4 of 6
S5Zlamal2Silhan2n = 4split evenly
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home330%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away110%
These 10 meetings
MetricZlamalSilhanZ − SBasisWins73+4in 10 meetingsFirst set64+2of 10Avg pointsper match38.134.5+3.6per matchSweeps31+23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricZlamalSilhanBasisWin rate · lifetime204 / 330 vs 89 / 17861.8%50%204 / 330 vs 89 / 178Avg sets wonper match2.22.0per matchAvg pointsper match37.737.0per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ZlamalZlamal 1.60/Silhan 2.20
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
58.3%
Zlamal · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Zlamal won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 8 · 18:55J. Zlamal—1191111113P. Silhan—71181332
LJul 23 · 18:55J. Zlamal—21050P. Silhan—1112113
LJun 9 · 19:25J. Zlamal—59111152P. Silhan—111189113
WJun 1 · 22:10J. Zlamal—11114113P. Silhan—761151
WJun 1 · 19:55J. Zlamal—711126113P. Silhan—116101152
WMay 25 · 19:25J. Zlamal—1111113P. Silhan—8560
WMay 19 · 19:25J. Zlamal—1111113P. Silhan—6680
WFeb 25 · 19:55J. Zlamal—1111103P. Silhan—9270
WFeb 24 · 19:50J. Zlamal—11114113P. Silhan—991161
LFeb 19 · 23:25J. Zlamal—412151192P. Silhan—1114136113
J. Zlamal10
WSep 8 · 21:25M. Stusek2.63811681J. Zlamal1.4411911113WSep 8 · 20:25J. Zlamal1.6111911113T. Vorisek2.20911961WSep 8 · 18:55P. Silhan2.2571181332J. Zlamal1.571191111113WSep 4 · 21:50J. Zlamal1.801211113T. Vorisek1.9110920WSep 4 · 20:50J. Zlamal1.4461111113F. Strejc2.63116751WSep 4 · 19:20T. Vorisek2.204950J. Zlamal1.611111113LSep 4 · 18:50M. Stusek2.63111175113J. Zlamal1.4496111162LSep 1 · 22:30J. Zlamal1.801361191F. Cernota1.9015116113WSep 1 · 21:25J. Zlamal1.671111113F. Cernota2.106990WSep 1 · 19:55M. Stusek2.503850J. Zlamal1.501111113
P. Silhan10
WSep 8 · 20:55P. Silhan2.1011511153T. Vorisek1.676114131WSep 8 · 19:55P. Silhan2.00781111113M. Stusek1.7311113862LSep 8 · 18:55P. Silhan2.2571181332J. Zlamal1.571191111113WAug 5 · 22:02P. Silhan1.671114113A. Hanl2.1091290LAug 5 · 21:25P. Silhan2.10118991M. Stusek1.6771111113LAug 5 · 19:55T. Vorisek1.73111011113P. Silhan2.00612761WAug 5 · 19:25A. Hanl2.50118101182P. Silhan1.50711127113LJul 27 · 21:48P. Silhan2.006580T. Vorisek1.731111113WJul 27 · 20:20T. Vorisek1.73911791P. Silhan2.0011411113LJul 27 · 19:50M. Stusek1.61711143113P. Silhan2.20119121182
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.