TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13097034
Played Sep 8Finished
Jerzy Michalik
Home
1.83
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
3111141012119116
Andrzej Krezel
Away
1.87
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 04:10 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeJerzy Michalik to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
88 points played in total.
Set by set
3111141012119116
H2H Jerzy Michalik 4–0 Andrzej Krezel Andrzej Krezel has won 0 of their 4 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 04:10What took a side4 for · 1 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.83 (51%)
Michalik
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
4-0 in 4
Michalik
Correct
gap of 4 in 4, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Michalik 1455 vs Krezel 1432
Michalik
Correct
both rated, 23 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Michalik 80% vs Krezel 60%
Michalik
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Michalik 60% vs Krezel 70%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Michalik +1 · Krezel +3
Krezel
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Michalik)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Michalik form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (55%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsMichalik 1.83 / Krezel 1.87
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Michalik)+3.5pp
TT Elite Series · #13097034
Michalik1.83
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite62% won 151 of 245
Up 2–0, closes it95% 77 of 81
Up 1–0, closes it77% 109 of 142
Krezel1.87
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As underdog29% won 49 of 170
Down 0–1, comes back8% 8 of 102
Down 0–2, comes back2% 1 of 66
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 4 meetings
HomeMichalik4wins
AwayKrezel0wins
Michalik leads 4–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 4 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Michalik2Krezel2n = 4split evenly
S2Michalik3Krezel1n = 4Michalik took 3 of 4
S3Michalik4Krezel0n = 4Michalik took 4 of 4
S4Michalik3Krezel0n = 3Michalik took 3 of 3
How those 4 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 4 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home125%
3–1Four sets, home375%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 4 meetings
MetricMichalikKrezelM − KBasisWins40+4in 4 meetingsFirst set220of 4Avg pointsper match40.536.5+4.0per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricMichalikKrezelBasisWin rate · lifetime539 / 1152 vs 70 / 22146.8%31.7%539 / 1152 vs 70 / 221Avg sets wonper match1.91.6per matchAvg pointsper match37.434.9per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
MichalikMichalik 1.83/Krezel 1.87
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
54%
Michalik · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Michalik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record4
WSep 7 · 21:10J. Michalik—41212113A. Krezel—11101081
WSep 3 · 21:00J. Michalik—1214113A. Krezel—101280
WSep 3 · 16:35J. Michalik—41211143A. Krezel—11105121
WAug 26 · 05:05J. Michalik—111112113A. Krezel—7131091
J. Michalik10
WSep 8 · 18:45M. Brunner2.008790J. Michalik1.671111113WSep 8 · 02:45J. Michalik1.501111113A. Staniczek2.302670LSep 8 · 01:10J. Michalik3.0058111372M. Warzecha1.311111711113WSep 8 · 24:00J. Michalik1.601111113M. Machelski2.107750WSep 7 · 22:25J. Michalik1.7311138113M. Karpiuk1.929111181WSep 7 · 21:10J. Michalik1.8841212113A. Krezel1.8211101081LSep 4 · 02:35J. Michalik2.508360H. Tkaczyk1.501111113WSep 4 · 01:00J. Michalik3.4051111113M. Guzik1.30116581LSep 3 · 23:45J. Michalik1.8311811111M. Machelski1.8313118133LSep 3 · 22:10J. Michalik1.91115916132M. Lewczuk1.808111114153
A. Krezel10
WSep 8 · 02:20M. Machelski1.868860A. Krezel1.801111113WSep 8 · 01:35A. Staniczek2.01991471A. Krezel1.66111112113WSep 7 · 23:35M. Karpiuk1.75211961A. Krezel1.9511611113LSep 7 · 22:50M. Warzecha1.32119119113A. Krezel3.1081161182LSep 7 · 21:10J. Michalik1.8841212113A. Krezel1.8211101081LSep 7 · 20:20J. Slawomir1.53117115113A. Krezel2.2381181152WSep 7 · 19:35A. Staniczek2.01611111162A. Krezel1.66111375113WSep 7 · 17:35M. Karpiuk1.8591110111A. Krezel1.8511712133WSep 7 · 16:50D. Maszczynski2.605780A. Krezel1.411111113WSep 7 · 15:10M. Warzecha1.27811981A. Krezel3.3011811113
Upcoming Matches
J. Michalik
A. Krezel1 of 9 neutral
Sep 8 · 19:30A. Krezel1.96K. Delikatny1.69—Sep 8 · 20:45A. Krezel3.25H. Tkaczyk1.26—Sep 8 · 21:55A. Krezel1.24A. Barton3.40—Sep 8 · 23:05A. Krezel1.90M. Brunner1.80—Sep 8 · 23:55A. Krezel1.69M. Machelski1.96—Sep 9 · 01:30A. Krezel1.96K. Delikatny1.69—Sep 9 · 02:45A. Krezel1.87M. Brunner1.77—Sep 9 · 03:55A. Krezel1.24A. Barton3.40—Sep 9 · 05:05A. Krezel—H. Tkaczyk——
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.