TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13093713
Played Sep 7Finished
Adam Staniczek
Home
2.01
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
3–7Last 10Won last 1
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
6111113117115611
Andrzej Krezel
Away
1.66
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 16:03 and never touched — 57.6% is still 57.6%
Graded at full timeAndrzej Krezel to win
57.6%
57.6%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
92 points played in total.
Set by set
6111113117115611
H2H Adam Staniczek 0–2 Andrzej Krezel Adam Staniczek has won 0 of their 2 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 16:03What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.66 (55%)
Krezel
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-2 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Staniczek 1226 vs Krezel 1431
Krezel
Correct
both rated, 204 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Staniczek 40% vs Krezel 60%
Krezel
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Staniczek 30% vs Krezel 60%
Krezel
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Staniczek +1 · Krezel +3
Krezel
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 58% — Slight lean (leans Krezel)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsStaniczek 2.01 / Krezel 1.66
Signal prob.42% / 58%
Edge (Krezel)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13093713
Staniczek2.01
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog26% won 113 of 437
Down 0–1, comes back11% 31 of 277
Down 0–2, comes back3% 6 of 206
Krezel1.66
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite40% won 17 of 43
Up 2–0, closes it93% 13 of 14
Up 1–0, closes it63% 15 of 24
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeStaniczek0wins
AwayKrezel2wins
Krezel leads 2–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away1
These 2 meetings
MetricStaniczekKrezelS − KBasisWins02−2in 2 meetingsFirst set02−2of 2Avg pointsper match23.036.0−13.0per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricStaniczekKrezelBasisWin rate · lifetime366 / 1002 vs 66 / 21436.5%30.8%366 / 1002 vs 66 / 214Avg sets wonper match1.61.5per matchAvg pointsper match33.834.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
KrezelStaniczek 2.01/Krezel 1.66
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
57.6%
Krezel · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Krezel won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LAug 21 · 01:45A. Staniczek—5211121A. Krezel—11113143
LAug 20 · 16:15A. Staniczek—5290A. Krezel—1111113
A. Staniczek10
WSep 7 · 21:35M. Karpiuk1.60513581A. Staniczek2.10111111113WSep 7 · 20:45M. Warzecha1.2269131172A. Staniczek3.601111118113WSep 7 · 18:25D. Maszczynski2.40511681A. Staniczek1.5011911113LSep 7 · 17:10J. Slawomir1.5481111113A. Staniczek2.25117781LSep 7 · 15:35M. Karpiuk1.7213814113A. Staniczek1.9711111281WSep 6 · 02:35O. Jedrzejowski1.409760A. Staniczek2.751111113LSep 6 · 01:25A. Staniczek2.631271161G. Mucha1.4414116113LSep 6 · 24:10T. Kocik1.241111811113A. Staniczek3.5513911962LSep 5 · 22:55P. Gesiarz1.301111113A. Staniczek3.407880WSep 5 · 21:20D. Maszczynski2.3811360A. Staniczek1.531311113
A. Krezel10
LSep 7 · 21:10J. Michalik1.8841212113A. Krezel1.8211101081LSep 7 · 20:20J. Slawomir1.53117115113A. Krezel2.2381181152WSep 7 · 17:35M. Karpiuk1.8591110111A. Krezel1.8511712133WSep 7 · 16:50D. Maszczynski2.605780A. Krezel1.411111113WSep 7 · 15:10M. Warzecha1.27811981A. Krezel3.3011811113LSep 6 · 02:00A. Krezel2.754611131C. Pawlik1.3711117153LSep 6 · 24:45A. Krezel2.256660K. Gudzik1.551111113WSep 5 · 23:35A. Krezel2.65111110113J. Oracz1.40651291WSep 5 · 22:25A. Fomin1.8711621192A. Krezel1.80511117113LSep 5 · 21:35A. Krezel2.705138101H. Tkaczyk1.39111111123
Upcoming Matches
A. Staniczek
A. Krezel
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.