TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13084904
Played Sep 6Finished
Andrzej Krezel
Home
2.25
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
4–6Last 10Won last 2
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
611611611––––
Krystian Gudzik
Away
1.55
At publish
Lost last 4Form at publish
4–6Last 10Lost last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 22:30 and never touched — 58.0% is still 58.0%
Graded at full timeKrystian Gudzik to win
58.0%
58.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
51 points played in total.
Set by set
611611611––––
H2H Andrzej Krezel 3–4 Krystian Gudzik Andrzej Krezel has won 3 of their 7 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 22:30What took a side2 for · 2 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.55 (59%)
Gudzik
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
3-4 in 7
—
Too close
gap of 1, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Krezel 1417 vs Gudzik 1411
Krezel
Wrong
both rated, 6 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Krezel 60% vs Gudzik 20%
Krezel
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Krezel 40% vs Gudzik 40%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Krezel +2 · Gudzik -4
Gudzik
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 60% — Slight lean (leans Gudzik) · live re-read · sealed at 58% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Gudzik form (20%) is below what odds imply (65%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsKrezel 2.25 / Gudzik 1.55
Signal prob.40% / 60%
Edge (Gudzik)+0.4pp
TT Elite Series · #13084904
Krezel2.25
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog28% won 44 of 156
Down 0–1, comes back9% 8 of 93
Down 0–2, comes back2% 1 of 61
Gudzik1.55
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 4
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite65% won 28 of 43
Up 2–0, closes it100% 15 of 15
Up 1–0, closes it88% 22 of 25
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 7 meetings
HomeKrezel3wins
AwayGudzik4wins
1 of 7 to a deciderGudzik leads 4–3, and 1 of those 7 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeKrezel100%3 of 3
AwayGudzik100%4 of 4
Set by set, in these 7 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Krezel3Gudzik4n = 7Gudzik took 4 of 7
S2Krezel4Gudzik3n = 7Krezel took 4 of 7
S3Krezel4Gudzik3n = 7Krezel took 4 of 7
S4Krezel2Gudzik3n = 5Gudzik took 3 of 5
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 7 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 7 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home114%
3–1Four sets, home229%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away114%
1–3Four sets, away229%
0–3Straight, away114%
These 7 meetings
MetricKrezelGudzikK − GBasisWins34−1in 7 meetingsFirst set34−1of 7Avg pointsper match34.436.7−2.3per matchSweeps1103–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricKrezelGudzikBasisWin rate · lifetime63 / 209 vs 40 / 7730.1%52%63 / 209 vs 40 / 77Avg sets wonper match1.51.9per matchAvg pointsper match34.735.4per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
GudzikKrezel 2.25/Gudzik 1.55
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
59.6%
Gudzik · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Gudzik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record7
WSep 5 · 18:45A. Krezel—12115113K. Gudzik—1081151
WAug 26 · 22:55A. Krezel—11612113K. Gudzik—2111091
LAug 26 · 16:55A. Krezel—4910K. Gudzik—1111113
LAug 24 · 21:20A. Krezel—611791K. Gudzik—11911113
LAug 24 · 15:25A. Krezel—381251K. Gudzik—111110113
WAug 13 · 23:45A. Krezel—1113113K. Gudzik—81150
LAug 13 · 15:50A. Krezel—1211111082K. Gudzik—145712113
A. Krezel10
LSep 6 · 02:00A. Krezel2.754611131C. Pawlik1.3711117153WSep 5 · 23:35A. Krezel2.65111110113J. Oracz1.40651291WSep 5 · 22:25A. Fomin1.8711621192A. Krezel1.80511117113LSep 5 · 21:35A. Krezel2.705138101H. Tkaczyk1.39111111123LSep 5 · 20:00A. Krezel1.907830A. Fomin1.801111113WSep 5 · 18:45A. Krezel2.0012115113K. Gudzik1.711081151LSep 5 · 17:35A. Krezel2.6097111172J. Oracz1.41111129113LSep 5 · 16:25C. Pawlik1.461111113A. Krezel2.474940LSep 5 · 15:35A. Krezel2.6041113962H. Tkaczyk1.411131111113WSep 4 · 02:10M. Machelski2.256720A. Krezel1.571111113
K. Gudzik10
LSep 6 · 02:20K. Gudzik2.806750J. Oracz1.391111113LSep 6 · 24:00A. Fomin1.5491311113K. Gudzik2.251111891LSep 5 · 23:10K. Gudzik3.159880H. Tkaczyk1.291111113LSep 5 · 22:00K. Gudzik2.8569131172C. Pawlik1.361111115113LSep 5 · 20:20K. Gudzik2.60117581J. Oracz1.4281111113LSep 5 · 18:45A. Krezel2.0012115113K. Gudzik1.711081151WSep 5 · 18:00C. Pawlik1.428111051K. Gudzik2.6011512113WSep 5 · 17:10K. Gudzik3.5011811113H. Tkaczyk1.25811241LSep 5 · 16:00K. Gudzik2.25117871A. Fomin1.5491111113WSep 3 · 04:40K. Gudzik1.891111113J. Skorupa1.799870
Upcoming Matches
A. Krezel1 of 2 neutral
K. Gudzik
Nothing scheduled
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.