TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13092483
Played Sep 8Finished
Karel Schopf
Home
2.63
At publish
Lost last 8Form at publish
1–9Last 10Lost last 8
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
511511811––––
Milan Klement
Away
1.44
At publish
Won last 6Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 6
The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:08 and never touched — 64.4% is still 64.4%
Graded at full timeMilan Klement to win
64.4%
64.4%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingKarel Schopf above · Milan Klement below
Set 1 · 5-11
Set 2 · 5-11
Set 3 · 8-11
Point 51 set 3, 8-11 — our read held Milan Klement at 64.4%
51 points played in total.
H2H Karel Schopf 3–8 Milan Klement Karel Schopf has won 3 of their 11 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 12:08What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.44 (65%)
Klement
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
3-8 in 11
Klement
Correct
gap of 5 in 11, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Schopf 1509 vs Klement 1661
Klement
Correct
both rated, 151 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Schopf 0% vs Klement 100%
Klement
Correct
100pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Schopf 10% vs Klement 70%
Klement
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Schopf -5 · Klement +5
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 69% — Clear lean (leans Klement) · live re-read · sealed at 64% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Klement form (100%) outperforms what odds imply (69%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsSchopf 2.63 / Klement 1.44
Signal prob.31% / 69%
Edge (Klement)+4.4pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13092483
Schopf2.63
10%won 1 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 8
oldest → newest10%takes the first set · 1 of 10
As underdog35% won 26 of 74
Down 0–1, comes back21% 10 of 48
Down 0–2, comes back7% 2 of 27
Klement1.44
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Won last 6
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite57% won 115 of 203
Up 2–0, closes it90% 60 of 67
Up 1–0, closes it73% 87 of 119
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeSchopf3wins
AwayKlement7wins
3 of 10 to a deciderKlement leads 7–3, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeSchopfn = 2, below the 3 needed
AwayKlement75%6 of 8
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Schopf2Klement8n = 10Klement took 8 of 10
S2Schopf2Klement8n = 10Klement took 8 of 10
S3Schopf4Klement6n = 10Klement took 6 of 10
S4Schopf5Klement1n = 6Schopf took 5 of 6
S5Schopf1Klement2n = 3Klement took 2 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away440%
These 10 meetings
MetricSchopfKlementS − KBasisWins37−4in 10 meetingsFirst set28−6of 10Avg pointsper match31.238.5−7.3per matchSweeps04−43–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricSchopfKlementBasisWin rate · lifetime229 / 462 vs 457 / 88449.6%51.7%229 / 462 vs 457 / 884Avg sets wonper match1.92.1per matchAvg pointsper match37.339.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
KlementSchopf 2.63/Klement 1.44
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
68.9%
Klement · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Klement won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 8 · 07:30K. Schopf—5580M. Klement—1111113
LJun 8 · 02:00K. Schopf—54130M. Klement—1111153
WJun 6 · 17:30K. Schopf—1071111113M. Klement—12116952
WJun 6 · 16:30K. Schopf—51111113M. Klement—117791
LJun 5 · 18:00K. Schopf—91141132M. Klement—118118113
WFeb 4 · 15:00K. Schopf—11911113M. Klement—711971
LFeb 3 · 01:00K. Schopf—8630M. Klement—1111113
LJan 20 · 07:00K. Schopf—761161M. Klement—11119113
LNov 25 · 24:30K. Schopf—1880M. Klement—1111113
LSep 17 · 07:30K. Schopf—11871132M. Klement—711117113
K. Schopf10
LSep 8 · 06:30S. Kasnik1.28121011113K. Schopf3.501012781LSep 7 · 02:00K. Schopf2.385430J. Tazler1.531111113LSep 7 · 01:00K. Schopf2.7534100V. Vejvoda1.401111123LSep 7 · 24:00J. Louda1.831111113K. Schopf1.838660LSep 6 · 22:30M. Sychra2.251111123K. Schopf1.5798100LSep 6 · 17:00K. Schopf2.206440J. Tazler1.611111113LSep 6 · 16:00R. Rose1.331111113K. Schopf3.258620LSep 6 · 15:00J. Tazler1.57118165113K. Schopf2.25411141142WSep 6 · 14:30K. Schopf2.101111113M. Pikous1.677890LSep 6 · 03:30J. Tazler1.671112123K. Schopf2.10310100
M. Klement10
LSep 8 · 08:00M. Klement1.6131110111S. Kasnik2.2011912133WSep 8 · 06:00M. Klement2.251111144113M. Sychra1.5744161172WSep 6 · 09:30M. Klement1.651111128113V. Vejvoda2.10138101162WSep 6 · 08:30P. Saleny2.00125781M. Klement1.73101111113WSep 6 · 07:30M. Klement1.6111811113V. Vejvoda2.20511591WSep 6 · 06:30M. Wagner1.5375111192M. Klement2.38111189113WSep 4 · 02:58T. Franek1.676850M. Klement2.101111113LSep 4 · 02:00M. Sychra1.531111113M. Klement2.388890WSep 4 · 24:30M. Klement2.20911136113T. Franek1.61119111152LSep 3 · 23:00M. Klement3.00891151J. Simecek1.3611117113
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.