TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13083385
Played Sep 6Finished
Jakub Tazler
Home
1.57
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
1148111614511114
Karel Schopf
Away
2.25
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 16:00 and never touched — 57.7% is still 57.7%
Graded at full timeJakub Tazler to win
57.7%
57.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is goingJakub Tazler above · Karel Schopf below
Set 1 · 11-4
Set 2 · 8-11
Set 3 · 16-14
Set 4 · 5-11
Set 5 · 9-4
Point 93 set 5, 9-4 — our read held Jakub Tazler at 57.7%
93 points drawn · the score is 2 ahead; the rest land in a moment.
H2H Jakub Tazler 7–6 Karel Schopf Karel Schopf has won 6 of their 13 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 16:00What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.57 (59%)
Tazler
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
7-6 in 13
—
Too close
gap of 1, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Tazler 1678 vs Schopf 1623
Tazler
Correct
both rated, 56 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Tazler 80% vs Schopf 60%
Tazler
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Tazler 60% vs Schopf 40%
Tazler
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Tazler -1 · Schopf +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 59% — Slight lean (leans Tazler) · live re-read · sealed at 58% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Schopf form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (44%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsTazler 1.57 / Schopf 2.25
Signal prob.59% / 41%
Edge (Tazler)+0.0pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13083385
Tazler1.57
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite59% won 90 of 153
Up 2–0, closes it92% 45 of 49
Up 1–0, closes it78% 70 of 90
Schopf2.25
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog37% won 25 of 67
Down 0–1, comes back24% 10 of 42
Down 0–2, comes back9% 2 of 22
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeTazler7wins
AwaySchopf3wins
Tazler leads 7–3.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeTazler100%6 of 6
AwaySchopf75%3 of 4
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Tazler6Schopf4n = 10Tazler took 6 of 10
S2Tazler8Schopf2n = 10Tazler took 8 of 10
S3Tazler8Schopf2n = 10Tazler took 8 of 10
S4Tazler2Schopf3n = 5Schopf took 3 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home550%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away330%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricTazlerSchopfT − SBasisWins73+4in 10 meetingsFirst set64+2of 10Avg pointsper match36.230.2+6.0per matchSweeps50+53–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricTazlerSchopfBasisWin rate · lifetime388 / 708 vs 229 / 45354.8%50.6%388 / 708 vs 229 / 453Avg sets wonper match2.12.0per matchAvg pointsper match38.437.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
TazlerTazler 1.57/Schopf 2.25
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
58.9%
Tazler · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Tazler won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WSep 6 · 03:30J. Tazler—1112123K. Schopf—310100
LSep 5 · 22:30J. Tazler—1071141K. Schopf—12119113
WAug 5 · 02:00J. Tazler—91111113K. Schopf—116751
WAug 3 · 13:30J. Tazler—121411113K. Schopf—1016481
LAug 3 · 10:30J. Tazler—811771K. Schopf—11711113
WAug 3 · 09:00J. Tazler—1111113K. Schopf—8980
WAug 3 · 07:00J. Tazler—1111113K. Schopf—7680
WJun 24 · 03:30J. Tazler—1114113K. Schopf—71280
LJun 24 · 02:00J. Tazler—8111081K. Schopf—11412113
WJun 23 · 19:00J. Tazler—1111113K. Schopf—7830
J. Tazler10
LSep 7 · 02:58V. Vejvoda1.67118118123J. Tazler2.10911511102WSep 7 · 02:00K. Schopf2.385430J. Tazler1.531111113LSep 7 · 24:30J. Tazler2.001111991M. Sychra1.7313511113LSep 6 · 23:00J. Tazler2.38811111482J. Louda1.531191312113LSep 6 · 22:00V. Vejvoda1.731212123J. Tazler2.001010100WSep 6 · 17:00K. Schopf2.206440J. Tazler1.611111113LSep 6 · 16:30J. Tazler2.25149511122M. Pikous1.571211119143LSep 6 · 14:00R. Rose1.571311113J. Tazler2.2511870WSep 6 · 03:30J. Tazler1.671112123K. Schopf2.10310100WSep 6 · 02:00J. Tazler2.759111011143M. Pikous1.40118129122
K. Schopf10
LSep 7 · 02:00K. Schopf2.385430J. Tazler1.531111113LSep 7 · 01:00K. Schopf2.7534100V. Vejvoda1.401111123LSep 7 · 24:00J. Louda1.831111113K. Schopf1.838660LSep 6 · 22:30M. Sychra2.251111123K. Schopf1.5798100LSep 6 · 17:00K. Schopf2.206440J. Tazler1.611111113LSep 6 · 16:00R. Rose1.331111113K. Schopf3.258620WSep 6 · 14:30K. Schopf2.101111113M. Pikous1.677890LSep 6 · 03:30J. Tazler1.671112123K. Schopf2.10310100LSep 6 · 01:30K. Schopf1.5710690M. Sychra2.251211113WSep 6 · 24:30M. Pikous1.6163141162K. Schopf2.201111129113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.