Milan Klement vs Viktor Vejvoda 3-1

TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro

Czech Liga ProMatch #13082438

Played Sep 6Finished

Milan Klement

Home

1.62

At publish

Won last 2

Form at publish

5–5Last 10Won last 2

Final

3 – 1

Set by set

115811115119––

Viktor Vejvoda

Away

2.20

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

7–3Last 10Won last 1

The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:10 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%

Graded at full time

Milan Klement to win

54.0%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

pick shipped

How it is goingMilan Klement above · Viktor Vejvoda below

Set 1 · 11-5

Set 2 · 8-11

Set 3 · 11-5

Set 4 · 11-9

Point 71 set 4, 11-9 — our read held Milan Klement at 54.0%

71 points played in total.

H2H Milan Klement 31–26 Viktor Vejvoda Viktor Vejvoda has won 26 of their 57 meetings.

Last 10 · 6–4Same sideHead to head

The pickNo pick published

Sealed 12:10

What took a side2 for · 2 against · 2 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.61 (58%)

Klement

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

31-26 in 57

Klement

Correct

gap of 5 in 57, over the gap of 2

Rating (G2)

Klement 1587 vs Vejvoda 1863

Vejvoda

Wrong

both rated, 276 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Klement 60% vs Vejvoda 60%

—

Too close

0pp gap, under the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Klement 50% vs Vejvoda 70%

Vejvoda

Wrong

20pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Klement +2 · Vejvoda +1

—

Too close

neither holds a run of 3 on their own

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

2 for, 2 silent — and the gate let it through as .

Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Klement)

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Vejvoda form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (45%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsKlement 1.61 / Vejvoda 2.20

Signal prob.54% / 46%

Edge (Klement)-3.7pp (anti-value)

Czech Liga Pro · #13082438

Klement1.61

50%won 5 of 10 · last 10

Won last 2

oldest → newest

50%takes the first set · 5 of 10

As favourite55% won 114 of 206

Up 2–0, closes it87% 60 of 69

Up 1–0, closes it72% 87 of 121

Vejvoda2.20

70%won 7 of 10 · last 10

oldest → newest

70%takes the first set · 7 of 10

As underdog44% won 104 of 238

Down 0–1, comes back23% 30 of 133

Down 0–2, comes back12% 10 of 83

Head to head

H2H window

The recordacross 10 meetings

HomeKlement6wins

AwayVejvoda4wins

2 of 10 to a deciderKlement leads 6–4, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.

First set to match win · in this matchup

HomeKlement85.7%6 of 7

AwayVejvoda100%3 of 3

Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one

S1Klement7Vejvoda3n = 10Klement took 7 of 10

S2Klement7Vejvoda3n = 10Klement took 7 of 10

S3Klement3Vejvoda7n = 10Vejvoda took 7 of 10

S4Klement5Vejvoda3n = 8Klement took 5 of 8

Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate

How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code

3–0Straight, home220%

3–1Four sets, home330%

3–2Decider, home110%

2–3Decider, away110%

1–3Four sets, away330%

0–3Straight, away00%

These 10 meetings

MetricKlementVejvodaK − VBasisWins64+2in 10 meetingsFirst set73+4of 10Avg pointsper match39.335.3+4.0per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3

Career, not this matchup

MetricKlementVejvodaBasisWin rate · lifetime452 / 878 vs 462 / 87951.5%52.6%452 / 878 vs 462 / 879Avg sets wonper match2.12.0per matchAvg pointsper match39.237.3per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Vejvoda

Klement 1.61/Vejvoda 2.20

Read onlywould have missed

What we said

54%

Klement · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–1

Klement won

Recent Results

H2H · no odds on record10

LSep 1 · 22:00M. Klement—10811101V. Vejvoda—12118123

LAug 30 · 22:00M. Klement—11105101V. Vejvoda—91211123

WAug 24 · 22:00M. Klement—11114113V. Vejvoda—861161

WAug 24 · 06:00M. Klement—11116113V. Vejvoda—341161

WAug 9 · 22:00M. Klement—114811113V. Vejvoda—81111762

LAug 5 · 18:00M. Klement—1012812102V. Vejvoda—12101110123

WAug 5 · 06:00M. Klement—1112113V. Vejvoda—41030

LJul 23 · 06:30M. Klement—6119101V. Vejvoda—11811123

WJul 22 · 10:00M. Klement—11116113V. Vejvoda—861181

WJul 19 · 24:00M. Klement—1111143V. Vejvoda—54120

M. Klement10

WSep 6 · 09:30M. Klement1.651111128113V. Vejvoda2.10138101162 WSep 6 · 08:30P. Saleny2.00125781M. Klement1.73101111113 WSep 6 · 06:30M. Wagner1.5375111192M. Klement2.38111189113 WSep 4 · 02:58T. Franek1.676850M. Klement2.101111113 LSep 4 · 02:00M. Sychra1.531111113M. Klement2.388890 WSep 4 · 24:30M. Klement2.20911136113T. Franek1.61119111152 LSep 3 · 23:00M. Klement3.00891151J. Simecek1.3611117113 LSep 3 · 22:00M. Wagner1.7351411113M. Klement2.001112971 LSep 3 · 09:28M. Regner2.2011128113M. Klement1.617101141 WSep 3 · 08:00S. Kasnik2.20101161192M. Klement1.61127119113

V. Vejvoda10

WSep 7 · 02:58V. Vejvoda1.67118118123J. Tazler2.10911511102 LSep 7 · 02:30J. Louda1.731412113V. Vejvoda2.00121080 WSep 7 · 01:00K. Schopf2.7534100V. Vejvoda1.401111123 LSep 6 · 23:30V. Vejvoda1.6711116862M. Sychra2.10761111113 WSep 6 · 22:00V. Vejvoda1.731212123J. Tazler2.001010100 LSep 6 · 09:30M. Klement1.651111128113V. Vejvoda2.10138101162 WSep 6 · 08:00V. Vejvoda2.251111133M. Wagner1.5773110 WSep 6 · 06:00V. Vejvoda1.5711127113P. Saleny2.255101151 LSep 5 · 09:30V. Nohejl1.7311117113V. Vejvoda2.00571171 WSep 5 · 08:30V. Vejvoda2.101111133O. Svacha1.6758110

Event Chatroom

This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.