TT Lossbeater/TT Cup
TT CupMatch #13091649
Played Sep 7Finished
Michal Brozek
Home
1.62
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
911911911––––
Marek Kulisek
Away
2.20
At publish
Lost last 4Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:39 and never touched — 58.1% is still 58.1%
Graded at full timeMichal Brozek to win
58.1%
58.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingMichal Brozek above · Marek Kulisek below
Set 1 · 9-11
Set 2 · 9-11
Set 3 · 9-11
Point 60 set 3, 9-11 — our read held Michal Brozek at 58.1%
60 points played in total.
H2H Michal Brozek 91–77 Marek Kulisek Marek Kulisek has won 77 of their 168 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 09:39What took a side4 for · 1 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.61 (58%)
Brozek
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
91-77 in 168
Brozek
Wrong
gap of 14 in 168, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Brozek 1680 vs Kulisek 1674
Brozek
Wrong
both rated, 6 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Brozek 40% vs Kulisek 20%
Brozek
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Brozek 60% vs Kulisek 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Brozek -1 · Kulisek -4
Kulisek
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 58% — Slight lean (leans Brozek)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Kulisek form (20%) is below what odds imply (45%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsBrozek 1.61 / Kulisek 2.20
Signal prob.58% / 42%
Edge (Brozek)+0.4pp
TT Cup · #13091649
Brozek1.61
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite58% won 155 of 268
Up 2–0, closes it86% 81 of 94
Up 1–0, closes it78% 115 of 148
Kulisek2.20
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 4
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog39% won 117 of 301
Down 0–1, comes back24% 41 of 172
Down 0–2, comes back7% 7 of 96
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeBrozek2wins
AwayKulisek8wins
4 of 10 to a deciderKulisek leads 8–2, and 4 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeBrozek25%1 of 4
AwayKulisek83.3%5 of 6
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Brozek4Kulisek6n = 10Kulisek took 6 of 10
S2Brozek6Kulisek4n = 10Brozek took 6 of 10
S3Brozek4Kulisek6n = 10Kulisek took 6 of 10
S4Brozek4Kulisek6n = 10Kulisek took 6 of 10
S5Brozek0Kulisek4n = 4Kulisek took 4 of 4
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away440%
1–3Four sets, away440%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricBrozekKulisekB − KBasisWins28−6in 10 meetingsFirst set46−2of 10Avg pointsper match40.543.2−2.7per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricBrozekKulisekBasisWin rate · lifetime533 / 1025 vs 389 / 87152%44.7%533 / 1025 vs 389 / 871Avg sets wonper match2.11.9per matchAvg pointsper match37.737.1per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
BrozekBrozek 1.61/Kulisek 2.20
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
58.1%
Brozek · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Kulisek won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 5 · 22:35M. Brozek—1212881M. Kulisek—141011113
LSep 5 · 21:25M. Brozek—19126672M. Kulisek—17101111113
WSep 2 · 20:50M. Brozek—11118113M. Kulisek—451131
LAug 30 · 21:58M. Brozek—12811872M. Kulisek—1011711113
LAug 30 · 18:55M. Brozek—211101182M. Kulisek—116128113
LAug 29 · 19:55M. Brozek—1191161M. Kulisek—41113113
LAug 27 · 22:25M. Brozek—711101292M. Kulisek—1151210113
LAug 27 · 21:25M. Brozek—461171M. Kulisek—11116113
LAug 23 · 21:25M. Brozek—571241M. Kulisek—111110113
WAug 20 · 15:25M. Brozek—111111113M. Kulisek—139851
M. Brozek10
LSep 7 · 19:55M. Brozek1.83511681P. Benes1.8311711113WSep 7 · 18:55M. Brozek2.751111123D. Bochnak1.4096100LSep 5 · 22:35M. Brozek1.751212881M. Kulisek1.95141011113LSep 5 · 21:25M. Kulisek2.0017101111113M. Brozek1.7319126672WSep 5 · 20:25M. Brozek1.5711711113O. Fiklik2.25311871WSep 5 · 18:55A. Rek2.50861161M. Brozek1.5011116113WSep 4 · 14:00D. Hyza1.90135101162M. Brozek1.801111127113LSep 4 · 12:50D. Hyza1.919111211113M. Brozek1.80111310962WSep 4 · 11:50M. Brozek1.611114113O. Fiklik2.2091260WSep 4 · 10:20A. Langer2.5058100M. Brozek1.501111123
M. Kulisek10
LSep 7 · 20:25D. Bochnak1.171171113113M. Kulisek4.5071161532LSep 7 · 19:25M. Kulisek2.50119181P. Benes1.5071111113LSep 6 · 21:48D. Hyza1.3611114113M. Kulisek3.00861191LSep 6 · 20:50M. Kulisek2.7577110D. Hyza1.401111133WSep 6 · 19:20M. Sulc2.0081370M. Kulisek1.731115113WSep 6 · 18:50J. Vonasek2.10410110M. Kulisek1.671112133WSep 5 · 22:35M. Brozek1.751212881M. Kulisek1.95141011113WSep 5 · 21:25M. Kulisek2.0017101111113M. Brozek1.7319126672WSep 5 · 19:55A. Rek1.83119781M. Kulisek1.8381111113LSep 5 · 19:25O. Fiklik2.00971211113M. Kulisek1.73111110672
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.