TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13089402
Played Sep 6Finished
Matej Volf
Home
1.93
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
8–2Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
115711119811119
Martin Vizek
Away
1.77
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 21:19 and never touched — 54.7% is still 54.7%
Graded at full timeMartin Vizek to win
54.7%
54.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingMatej Volf above · Martin Vizek below
Set 1 · 11-5
Set 2 · 7-11
Set 3 · 11-9
Set 4 · 8-11
Set 5 · 11-9
Point 93 set 5, 11-9 — our read held Martin Vizek at 54.7%
93 points played in total.
H2H Matej Volf 4–7 Martin Vizek Matej Volf has won 4 of their 11 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 21:19What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.77 (52%)
Vizek
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
4-7 in 11
Vizek
Wrong
gap of 3 in 11, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Volf 1569 vs Vizek 1612
Vizek
Wrong
both rated, 43 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Volf 60% vs Vizek 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Volf 80% vs Vizek 60%
Volf
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Volf -1 · Vizek +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Vizek) · live re-read · sealed at 55% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsVolf 1.93 / Vizek 1.77
Signal prob.46% / 54%
Edge (Vizek)+1.8pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13089402
Volf1.93
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog43% won 31 of 72
Down 0–1, comes back28% 12 of 43
Down 0–2, comes back8% 2 of 24
Vizek1.77
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As favourite60% won 44 of 73
Up 2–0, closes it96% 23 of 24
Up 1–0, closes it82% 32 of 39
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeVolf4wins
AwayVizek6wins
6 of 10 to a deciderVizek leads 6–4, and 6 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeVolf66.7%4 of 6
AwayVizek100%4 of 4
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Volf6Vizek4n = 10Volf took 6 of 10
S2Volf3Vizek7n = 10Vizek took 7 of 10
S3Volf4Vizek6n = 10Vizek took 6 of 10
S4Volf5Vizek3n = 8Volf took 5 of 8
S5Volf2Vizek4n = 6Vizek took 4 of 6
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away440%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away220%
These 10 meetings
MetricVolfVizekVolf − VizekBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set64+2of 10Avg pointsper match42.243.9−1.7per matchSweeps02−23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricVolfVizekBasisWin rate · lifetime205 / 397 vs 211 / 41251.6%51.2%205 / 397 vs 211 / 412Avg sets wonper match2.12.1per matchAvg pointsper match37.538.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
VizekVolf 1.93/Vizek 1.77
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Vizek · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Volf won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 6 · 20:00M. Volf—1412126102M. Vizek—12101411123
LFeb 28 · 02:30M. Volf—99111182M. Vizek—111188113
WJan 11 · 01:00M. Volf—11116113M. Vizek—571191
LNov 1 · 18:00M. Volf—111012872M. Vizek—8121011113
WNov 1 · 15:00M. Volf—1311773M. Vizek—1141121
WOct 26 · 20:00M. Volf—115126113M. Vizek—611101152
LApr 5 · 23:00M. Volf—9560M. Vizek—1111113
WApr 4 · 17:30M. Volf—1110914153M. Vizek—8121112132
LApr 4 · 16:00M. Volf—65111292M. Vizek—1111710113
LMar 11 · 21:00M. Volf—111160M. Vizek—1313113
M. Volf10
LSep 7 · 02:30M. Chlebecek1.5381111113M. Volf2.38114681WSep 7 · 01:00M. Sobisek1.44511341M. Volf2.6311711113LSep 6 · 23:30M. Volf1.618860V. Cermak2.201111113LSep 6 · 22:00M. Volf1.5771260R. Krejci2.251114113LSep 6 · 20:00M. Vizek1.8312101411123M. Volf1.831412126102WSep 6 · 19:00R. Krejci2.007680M. Volf1.731111113WSep 6 · 18:30M. Volf2.25911112123T. Janata1.57118611102LAug 11 · 01:30M. Sobisek1.501111113M. Volf2.506920WAug 11 · 24:00M. Volf1.6791311113A. Hlawatschke2.101111541WAug 10 · 23:00P. Zmuda1.9134120M. Volf1.801111143
M. Vizek10
WSep 6 · 20:00M. Vizek1.8312101411123M. Volf1.831412126102LSep 6 · 19:30T. Janata2.2511911113M. Vizek1.57911721WSep 6 · 18:00M. Vizek1.5061111113R. Krejci2.50118861LAug 30 · 21:28M. Vizek1.80341171M. Nohejl1.9111118113WAug 30 · 20:00M. Vizek1.73511611113M. Nohejl2.0011811772WAug 30 · 19:30T. Janata2.20361191M. Vizek1.6111117113WAug 30 · 18:00M. Vizek2.2581613113T. Vinter1.5711141161WAug 26 · 16:58M. Sedlak1.806760M. Vizek1.911111113LAug 26 · 16:00J. Pozarsky1.731111113M. Vizek2.005980LAug 26 · 15:00M. Sedlak1.83661211113M. Vizek1.83111110982
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.