TT Lossbeater/TT Cup
TT CupMatch #13063472
Played Sep 2Finished
Ondrej Fiklik
Home
1.67
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
1210117118––––
Martin Sulc
Away
2.10
At publish
Lost last 7Form at publish
2–8Last 10Lost last 7
The read, and what happenedsealed at 09:59 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeOndrej Fiklik to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightpick shipped
How it is goingOndrej Fiklik above · Martin Sulc below
Set 1 · 12-10
Set 2 · 11-7
Set 3 · 11-8
Point 59 set 3, 11-8 — our read held Ondrej Fiklik at 54.0%
59 points played in total.
H2H Ondrej Fiklik 16–14 Martin Sulc Martin Sulc has won 14 of their 30 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 09:59What took a side5 for · 1 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.67 (56%)
Fiklik
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
16-14 in 30
Fiklik
Correct
gap of 2 in 30, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Fiklik 1503 vs Sulc 1492
Fiklik
Correct
both rated, 10 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Fiklik 40% vs Sulc 0%
Fiklik
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Fiklik 50% vs Sulc 20%
Fiklik
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Fiklik +1 · Sulc -5
Sulc
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 0 silent — and the gate let it through as .
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Fiklik)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Sulc form (0%) is below what odds imply (48%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsFiklik 1.67 / Sulc 2.10
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Sulc)+1.8pp
TT Cup · #13063472
Fiklik1.67
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite54% won 100 of 186
Up 2–0, closes it90% 46 of 51
Up 1–0, closes it76% 67 of 88
Sulc2.10
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 7
oldest → newest30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog42% won 74 of 177
Down 0–1, comes back30% 28 of 94
Down 0–2, comes back7% 4 of 54
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeFiklik6wins
AwaySulc4wins
1 of 10 to a deciderFiklik leads 6–4, and 1 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeFiklik83.3%5 of 6
AwaySulc75%3 of 4
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Fiklik6Sulc4n = 10Fiklik took 6 of 10
S2Fiklik8Sulc2n = 10Fiklik took 8 of 10
S3Fiklik7Sulc3n = 10Fiklik took 7 of 10
S4Fiklik0Sulc5n = 5Sulc took 5 of 5
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home550%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away440%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricFiklikSulcF − SBasisWins64+2in 10 meetingsFirst set64+2of 10Avg pointsper match34.733.4+1.3per matchSweeps50+53–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricFiklikSulcBasisWin rate · lifetime556 / 1222 vs 338 / 64845.5%52.2%556 / 1222 vs 338 / 648Avg sets wonper match1.92.1per matchAvg pointsper match37.037.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
SulcFiklik 1.67/Sulc 2.10
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Fiklik · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Fiklik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WJul 24 · 07:55O. Fiklik—1111113M. Sulc—8880
WJun 28 · 19:50O. Fiklik—711119113M. Sulc—11961192
WJun 28 · 07:50O. Fiklik—1111113M. Sulc—5660
LJun 27 · 19:55O. Fiklik—212761M. Sulc—111011113
LJun 26 · 19:20O. Fiklik—1149111M. Sulc—91111133
WJun 21 · 08:50O. Fiklik—1211113M. Sulc—10850
LJun 19 · 19:20O. Fiklik—821131M. Sulc—11119113
WJun 10 · 19:20O. Fiklik—1411133M. Sulc—129110
WJun 8 · 19:20O. Fiklik—1116113M. Sulc—31480
LJun 7 · 22:10O. Fiklik—1011781M. Sulc—12411113
O. Fiklik10
LSep 5 · 22:03O. Fiklik2.2510890A. Rek1.571211113WSep 5 · 20:55A. Rek1.61811861O. Fiklik2.2011411113LSep 5 · 20:25M. Brozek1.5711711113O. Fiklik2.25311871WSep 5 · 19:25O. Fiklik2.00971211113M. Kulisek1.73111110672LSep 4 · 13:29A. Langer2.006111011113O. Fiklik1.7311912982LSep 4 · 12:20A. Langer2.0011711113O. Fiklik1.73911531LSep 4 · 11:50M. Brozek1.611114113O. Fiklik2.2091260LSep 4 · 10:50O. Fiklik2.2511811772D. Hyza1.57911411113LSep 2 · 21:50M. Brozek1.601111113O. Fiklik2.206640WSep 2 · 19:20O. Fiklik2.0011118113M. Kulisek1.73421141
M. Sulc10
LSep 6 · 21:18M. Sulc2.381291181J. Vonasek1.5314118113WSep 6 · 20:20M. Sulc3.2511614113J. Vonasek1.337111271LSep 6 · 19:20M. Sulc2.0081370M. Kulisek1.731115113LSep 6 · 18:20M. Sulc2.5051181192D. Hyza1.50119118113LSep 2 · 21:20M. Kulisek1.551111127123M. Sulc2.30531411102LSep 2 · 19:50M. Brozek1.4012118113M. Sulc2.751061191LSep 2 · 18:50M. Sulc2.20125571M. Kulisek1.61101111113LAug 31 · 13:23V. Jr1.7371111113M. Sulc2.00117641LAug 31 · 12:20V. Jr2.101113113M. Sulc1.6781160LAug 31 · 11:50J. Vonasek1.401111113M. Sulc2.758350
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.