TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Setka CupMatch #13049755
Played Aug 31Finished
Tomas Stejskal
Home
2.20
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 2
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
11810121311116––
Ladislav Hendrych
Away
1.62
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 21:33 and never touched — 54.5% is still 54.5%
Graded at full timeLadislav Hendrych to win
54.5%
54.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingTomas Stejskal above · Ladislav Hendrych below
Set 1 · 11-8
Set 2 · 10-12
Set 3 · 13-11
Set 4 · 11-6
Point 82 set 4, 11-6 — our read held Ladislav Hendrych at 54.5%
82 points played in total.
H2H Tomas Stejskal 4–4 Ladislav Hendrych Dead even across their 8 meetings.
Last 8 · 4–4Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 21:33What took a side3 for · 0 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.61 (58%)
Hendrych
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
4-4 in 8
—
Too close
gap of 0, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Stejskal 1462 vs Hendrych 1546
Hendrych
Wrong
both rated, 85 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Stejskal 40% vs Hendrych 60%
Hendrych
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Stejskal 60% vs Hendrych 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Stejskal -2 · Hendrych +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 59% — Slight lean (leans Hendrych) · live re-read · sealed at 55% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsStejskal 2.20 / Hendrych 1.61
Signal prob.42% / 59%
Edge (Hendrych)+0.8pp
Setka Cup · #13049755
Stejskal2.20
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog36% won 14 of 39
Down 0–1, comes back23% 5 of 22
Down 0–2, comes back0% 0 of 11
Hendrych1.61
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite61% won 59 of 97
Up 2–0, closes it82% 31 of 38
Up 1–0, closes it78% 46 of 59
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 8 meetings
HomeStejskal4wins
AwayHendrych4wins
4 of 8 to a deciderLevel at 4–4, and 4 of those 8 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeStejskal100%4 of 4
AwayHendrych100%4 of 4
Set by set, in these 8 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Stejskal4Hendrych4n = 8split evenly
S2Stejskal5Hendrych3n = 8Stejskal took 5 of 8
S3Stejskal5Hendrych3n = 8Stejskal took 5 of 8
S4Stejskal3Hendrych2n = 5Stejskal took 3 of 5
S5Stejskal1Hendrych3n = 4Hendrych took 3 of 4
How those 8 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 8 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home225%
3–1Four sets, home113%
3–2Decider, home113%
2–3Decider, away338%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away113%
These 8 meetings
MetricStejskalHendrychS − HBasisWins440in 8 meetingsFirst set440of 8Avg pointsper match39.437.1+2.3per matchSweeps21+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricStejskalHendrychBasisWin rate · lifetime101 / 218 vs 191 / 37446.3%51.1%101 / 218 vs 191 / 374Avg sets wonper match1.92.2per matchAvg pointsper match37.139.0per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HendrychStejskal 2.20/Hendrych 1.61
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
58.5%
Hendrych · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Stejskal won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record8
LApr 8 · 20:44T. Stejskal—89110L. Hendrych—1111133
LApr 8 · 17:15T. Stejskal—121161152L. Hendrych—147112113
WFeb 4 · 20:30T. Stejskal—1111133L. Hendrych—98120
LJan 28 · 19:30T. Stejskal—66111162L. Hendrych—111168113
WNov 7 · 20:30T. Stejskal—1112113L. Hendrych—61060
WJul 1 · 17:30T. Stejskal—1181112113L. Hendrych—81141472
WJun 2 · 18:00T. Stejskal—11118113L. Hendrych—581171
LMay 16 · 20:00T. Stejskal—91111622L. Hendrych—117411113
T. Stejskal10
WAug 31 · 20:38M. Vana1.531181061T. Stejskal2.3871112113LAug 31 · 19:30T. Stejskal2.2031181162M. Vana1.61116119113WAug 31 · 18:30T. Stejskal2.631111113O. Karpisek1.449460LAug 24 · 12:23T. Stejskal1.3011101081J. Jnr3.4081212113LAug 24 · 11:45T. Stejskal2.00610111182M. Vorel1.73111261113WAug 24 · 10:15J. Jnr2.635720T. Stejskal1.441111113LAug 24 · 09:45J. Hanacek1.9111111112123T. Stejskal1.80137514102WAug 19 · 20:18J. Jnr2.1091180T. Stejskal1.671113113WAug 19 · 19:15T. Stejskal1.83118119113J. Jnr1.8371161152WAug 19 · 18:15T. Stejskal1.8311115113A. Dvoracek1.83571171
L. Hendrych10
LSep 5 · 16:29J. Hanacek4.00116117113L. Hendrych1.2251141152LSep 5 · 15:30L. Hendrych2.6391141152S. Kalensky1.44116115113LSep 5 · 14:30L. Hendrych1.578890F. Kubos2.251111113WSep 5 · 13:30L. Hendrych1.251111113J. Hanacek3.759690WAug 31 · 21:09L. Hendrych1.7311129113O. Karpisek2.004101171WAug 31 · 20:00O. Karpisek1.80113571L. Hendrych1.91111111113LAug 31 · 19:00M. Vana2.10121011113L. Hendrych1.671012991WAug 29 · 08:23L. Hendrych2.101611911113M. Taranko1.67146111392LAug 29 · 07:15M. Taranko1.80121299113L. Hendrych1.911010111162WAug 29 · 06:45L. Hendrych2.001111113T. Bertho1.735880
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.