TT Lossbeater/Setka Cup
Setka CupMatch #13079252
Played Sep 5Finished
Ladislav Hendrych
Home
1.57
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 3
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
811811911––––
Filip Kubos
Away
2.25
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:32 and never touched — 59.7% is still 59.7%
Graded at full timeLadislav Hendrych to win
59.7%
59.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongno pick shipped
How it is goingLadislav Hendrych above · Filip Kubos below
Set 1 · 8-11
Set 2 · 8-11
Set 3 · 9-11
Point 58 set 3, 9-11 — our read held Ladislav Hendrych at 59.7%
58 points played in total.
H2H Ladislav Hendrych 11–10 Filip Kubos Filip Kubos has won 10 of their 21 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 20:32What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.57 (59%)
Hendrych
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
11-10 in 21
—
Too close
gap of 1, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Hendrych 1560 vs Kubos 1519
Hendrych
Wrong
both rated, 41 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Hendrych 60% vs Kubos 40%
Hendrych
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Hendrych 60% vs Kubos 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Hendrych +3 · Kubos +2
Hendrych
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 61% — Slight lean (leans Hendrych) · live re-read · sealed at 60% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsHendrych 1.57 / Kubos 2.25
Signal prob.61% / 40%
Edge (Hendrych)+1.6pp
Setka Cup · #13079252
Hendrych1.57
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite60% won 59 of 98
Up 2–0, closes it82% 32 of 39
Up 1–0, closes it78% 47 of 60
Kubos2.25
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As underdog44% won 87 of 198
Down 0–1, comes back25% 28 of 114
Down 0–2, comes back11% 7 of 65
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeHendrych4wins
AwayKubos6wins
5 of 10 to a deciderKubos leads 6–4, and 5 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeHendrych66.7%4 of 6
AwayKubos100%4 of 4
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Hendrych6Kubos4n = 10Hendrych took 6 of 10
S2Hendrych6Kubos4n = 10Hendrych took 6 of 10
S3Hendrych4Kubos6n = 10Kubos took 6 of 10
S4Hendrych5Kubos3n = 8Hendrych took 5 of 8
S5Hendrych1Kubos4n = 5Kubos took 4 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home220%
3–1Four sets, home110%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away440%
1–3Four sets, away220%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricHendrychKubosH − KBasisWins46−2in 10 meetingsFirst set64+2of 10Avg pointsper match39.940.5−0.6per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHendrychKubosBasisWin rate · lifetime193 / 371 vs 366 / 71552%51.2%193 / 371 vs 366 / 715Avg sets wonper match2.22.1per matchAvg pointsper match39.038.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
HendrychHendrych 1.57/Kubos 2.25
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
60.5%
Hendrych · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Kubos won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 29 · 05:45L. Hendrych—511791F. Kubos—11811113
WAug 22 · 18:00L. Hendrych—1111113F. Kubos—3970
LJul 20 · 20:29L. Hendrych—58121272F. Kubos—11111010113
LJul 20 · 19:00L. Hendrych—14771172F. Kubos—1211118113
WJul 6 · 19:00L. Hendrych—1111113F. Kubos—7840
WJul 4 · 17:30L. Hendrych—111166113F. Kubos—98111172
WFeb 26 · 18:15L. Hendrych—11116113F. Kubos—951191
LFeb 23 · 21:26L. Hendrych—119111182F. Kubos—911139113
LFeb 23 · 20:30L. Hendrych—651581F. Kubos—111113113
LFeb 12 · 20:30L. Hendrych—91171152F. Kubos—113115113
L. Hendrych10
LSep 5 · 16:29J. Hanacek4.00116117113L. Hendrych1.2251141152LSep 5 · 15:30L. Hendrych2.6391141152S. Kalensky1.44116115113WSep 5 · 13:30L. Hendrych1.251111113J. Hanacek3.759690WAug 31 · 21:09L. Hendrych1.7311129113O. Karpisek2.004101171WAug 31 · 20:00O. Karpisek1.80113571L. Hendrych1.91111111113LAug 31 · 19:00M. Vana2.10121011113L. Hendrych1.671012991LAug 31 · 17:30T. Stejskal2.20111013113L. Hendrych1.618121161WAug 29 · 08:23L. Hendrych2.101611911113M. Taranko1.67146111392LAug 29 · 07:15M. Taranko1.80121299113L. Hendrych1.911010111162WAug 29 · 06:45L. Hendrych2.001111113T. Bertho1.735880
F. Kubos10
WSep 5 · 16:59F. Kubos1.8011911113S. Kalensky1.91311891WSep 5 · 16:00F. Kubos1.801111103J. Hanacek1.915870WSep 5 · 14:00S. Kalensky1.731181051F. Kubos2.008111293WSep 3 · 20:43F. Kubos2.50119119113M. Cizek1.5091181182LSep 3 · 20:00S. Kalensky1.73111139113F. Kubos2.0069111142LSep 3 · 19:00M. Cizek1.441011118113F. Kubos2.6312971152LSep 3 · 17:30J. Snr1.73871111113F. Kubos2.0011118572WAug 29 · 08:54T. Bertho1.9114911111F. Kubos1.8016119133LAug 29 · 07:45F. Kubos1.80111111662T. Bertho1.91581311113LAug 29 · 06:15M. Taranko1.53311114113F. Kubos2.3811771172
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.