TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #12475597
Played Aug 23Finished
Vaclav Zidek
Home
1.57
At publish
Won last 9Form at publish
9–1Last 10Won last 9
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
1189111191012117
David Heczko
Away
2.25
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 13:21 and never touched — 63.7% is still 63.7%
Graded at full timeVaclav Zidek to win
63.7%
63.7%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
99 points played in total.
Set by set
1189111191012117
H2H Vaclav Zidek 9–4 David Heczko David Heczko has won 4 of their 13 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 13:21What took a side6 for · 0 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.57 (59%)
Zidek
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
9-4 in 13
Zidek
Correct
gap of 5 in 13, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Zidek 1699 vs Heczko 1604
Zidek
Correct
both rated, 95 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Zidek 100% vs Heczko 60%
Zidek
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Zidek 90% vs Heczko 50%
Zidek
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Zidek +5 · Heczko +2
Zidek
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
6 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 64% — Clear lean (leans Zidek)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Heczko form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (44%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsZidek 1.57 / Heczko 2.25
Signal prob.64% / 36%
Edge (Zidek)+5.0pp
Czech Liga Pro · #12475597
Zidek1.57
90%won 9 of 10 · last 10
Won last 9
oldest → newest90%takes the first set · 9 of 10
As favourite67% won 62 of 92
Up 2–0, closes it83% 29 of 35
Up 1–0, closes it79% 46 of 58
Heczko2.25
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog51% won 53 of 105
Down 0–1, comes back26% 12 of 47
Down 0–2, comes back7% 2 of 29
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeZidek8wins
AwayHeczko2wins
4 of 10 to a deciderZidek leads 8–2, and 4 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeZidek87.5%7 of 8
AwayHeczkon = 2, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Zidek8Heczko2n = 10Zidek took 8 of 10
S2Zidek5Heczko5n = 10split evenly
S3Zidek7Heczko3n = 10Zidek took 7 of 10
S4Zidek6Heczko2n = 8Zidek took 6 of 8
S5Zidek2Heczko2n = 4split evenly
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home220%
3–1Four sets, home440%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricZidekHeczkoZ − HBasisWins82+6in 10 meetingsFirst set82+6of 10Avg pointsper match43.738.6+5.1per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricZidekHeczkoBasisWin rate · lifetime231 / 405 vs 243 / 44057%55.2%231 / 405 vs 243 / 440Avg sets wonper match2.12.1per matchAvg pointsper match38.038.1per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ZidekZidek 1.57/Heczko 2.25
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
63.9%
Zidek · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Zidek won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WAug 2 · 13:00V. Zidek—1111113D. Heczko—9940
WAug 2 · 10:30V. Zidek—91911113D. Heczko—1117181
LJul 28 · 21:12V. Zidek—1112311102D. Heczko—1310116123
LJul 28 · 19:30V. Zidek—111195112D. Heczko—981111133
WMay 10 · 19:30V. Zidek—118116113D. Heczko—41151142
WApr 17 · 21:28V. Zidek—111011113D. Heczko—912921
WApr 17 · 20:00V. Zidek—11411153D. Heczko—9117131
WApr 7 · 20:00V. Zidek—131012153D. Heczko—111210131
WMar 30 · 20:00V. Zidek—1311113D. Heczko—11980
WMar 24 · 18:30V. Zidek—114711113D. Heczko—41111972
V. Zidek10
LAug 30 · 20:59A. Walek1.631111143V. Zidek2.1385120LAug 30 · 20:30D. Machander1.6111811113V. Zidek2.20911871LAug 30 · 19:30V. Zidek2.1011912462S. Byrtus1.679111011113LAug 30 · 18:30A. Walek1.911411113V. Zidek1.8012340LAug 30 · 17:01V. Zidek1.839850E. Rychlik1.831111113LAug 30 · 16:30R. Skacelik1.50111210113V. Zidek2.502101251WAug 30 · 15:30V. Zidek2.001311113E. Rychlik1.7311850LAug 30 · 14:30D. Heczko2.201711113V. Zidek1.6115540WAug 23 · 13:30D. Heczko2.63413118122V. Zidek1.441111611143LAug 23 · 12:30A. Walek1.9111911113V. Zidek1.80611851
D. Heczko10
LSep 5 · 13:04D. Heczko3.257240D. Langer1.331111113LSep 5 · 12:00M. Bereiter1.53148811133D. Heczko2.381211118112WSep 5 · 11:00D. Langer1.8016911562D. Heczko1.911411711113LSep 5 · 10:30D. Heczko1.61871151A. Walek2.2011117113LSep 5 · 09:29D. Heczko1.57139281J. Snr2.25111111113WSep 5 · 08:00L. Martinak1.809980D. Heczko1.911111113LSep 5 · 07:00A. Walek2.10121112113D. Heczko1.671481071WSep 5 · 06:30D. Heczko1.6771511113J. Snr2.101113971WAug 30 · 14:30D. Heczko2.201711113V. Zidek1.6115540LAug 23 · 13:30D. Heczko2.63413118122V. Zidek1.441111611143
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.