TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13116487
Played Sep 12Finished
Patryk Mecik
Home
2.25
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
2–8Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
911118118811115
Kacper Adamus
Away
1.55
At publish
Won last 5Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 5
The read, and what happenedsealed at 19:28 and never touched — 68.4% is still 68.4%
Graded at full timeKacper Adamus to win
68.4%
68.4%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
93 points played in total.
Set by set
911118118811115
H2H Patryk Mecik 16–19 Kacper Adamus Patryk Mecik has won 16 of their 35 meetings.
Last 10 · 5–5Head to head
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 19:28What took a side6 for · 0 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.55 (59%)
Adamus
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
16-19 in 35
Adamus
Wrong
gap of 3 in 35, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Mecik 1242 vs Adamus 1474
Adamus
Wrong
both rated, 233 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Mecik 20% vs Adamus 100%
Adamus
Wrong
80pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Mecik 20% vs Adamus 70%
Adamus
Wrong
50pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Mecik +1 · Adamus +5
Adamus
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
6 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 62% — Clear lean (leans Adamus) · live re-read · sealed at 68% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Adamus form (100%) outperforms what odds imply (65%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsMecik 2.25 / Adamus 1.55
Signal prob.38% / 62%
Edge (Adamus)+2.8pp
TT Elite Series · #13116487
Mecik2.25
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As underdog37% won 106 of 289
Down 0–1, comes back18% 30 of 165
Down 0–2, comes back2% 2 of 92
Adamus1.55
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Won last 5
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite62% won 375 of 609
Up 2–0, closes it98% 204 of 209
Up 1–0, closes it80% 299 of 376
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeMecik5wins
AwayAdamus5wins
6 of 10 to a deciderLevel at 5–5, and 6 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeMecik66.7%2 of 3
AwayAdamus57.1%4 of 7
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Mecik3Adamus7n = 10Adamus took 7 of 10
S2Mecik7Adamus3n = 10Mecik took 7 of 10
S3Mecik3Adamus7n = 10Adamus took 7 of 10
S4Mecik2Adamus7n = 9Adamus took 7 of 9
S5Mecik5Adamus1n = 6Mecik took 5 of 6
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home550%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away330%
0–3Straight, away110%
These 10 meetings
MetricMecikAdamusM − ABasisWins550in 10 meetingsFirst set37−4of 10Avg pointsper match44.145.7−1.6per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricMecikAdamusBasisWin rate · lifetime326 / 820 vs 939 / 173539.8%54.1%326 / 820 vs 939 / 1735Avg sets wonper match1.82.1per matchAvg pointsper match37.038.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
AdamusMecik 2.25/Adamus 1.55
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
62%
Adamus · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Mecik won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LAug 2 · 06:25P. Mecik—81191182K. Adamus—117118113
WJul 30 · 19:10P. Mecik—139119113K. Adamus—111141192
LJul 18 · 06:25P. Mecik—512981K. Adamus—111011113
WJun 4 · 15:10P. Mecik—121177113K. Adamus—108111152
WMay 14 · 19:35P. Mecik—1111119113K. Adamus—13771172
LDec 31 · 15:20P. Mecik—71260K. Adamus—1114113
WDec 31 · 07:20P. Mecik—411912113K. Adamus—117111092
LDec 3 · 14:55P. Mecik—10119111K. Adamus—12911133
WDec 3 · 08:55P. Mecik—1011124203K. Adamus—1291011182
LOct 21 · 13:10P. Mecik—1178101K. Adamus—71111123
P. Mecik10
WSep 12 · 04:00R. Skotniczny1.38413441P. Mecik2.65111111113LSep 11 · 16:40P. Mecik2.90811451G. Wichowski1.3211811113LSep 11 · 15:05J. Pruszkowski1.32711311123P. Mecik2.90114116102LSep 11 · 14:20R. Skotniczny1.4211511113P. Mecik2.60711941LSep 11 · 13:30P. Mecik2.267860P. Kurek1.521111113LSep 11 · 12:20P. Mecik2.7510911111S. Szostok1.3612115133LSep 11 · 10:40P. Mecik2.90113951G. Wichowski1.3271111113LSep 11 · 09:05J. Pruszkowski1.35911911113P. Mecik2.9011811762WSep 11 · 08:20S. Szostok1.38711111152P. Mecik2.65119139113LSep 11 · 07:30P. Mecik2.1511361192P. Kurek1.60711118113
K. Adamus10
LSep 12 · 05:35O. Sokolowski3.10961211113K. Adamus1.30111110972WSep 12 · 03:10W. Pytlas2.05711139182K. Adamus1.681131111203WSep 10 · 16:20W. Glanowski2.6041080K. Adamus1.411112113WSep 10 · 15:30K. Hetnar1.85611911152K. Adamus1.80119114173WSep 10 · 14:45K. Adamus1.8291111113O. Jadach1.88117951WSep 10 · 13:10K. Adamus1.5013911113K. Jablonski2.311111761LSep 10 · 12:20J. Pelka2.36111212113K. Adamus1.487141041WSep 10 · 11:05K. Adamus1.851111113O. Jadach1.858790LSep 10 · 09:30K. Adamus2.029101191K. Hetnar1.6511127113WSep 10 · 08:20K. Adamus1.511212113J. Pelka2.28101050
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.