TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13107617
Played Sep 10Finished
Kacper Adamus
Home
1.50
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 1
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
1311911117116––
Karol Jablonski
Away
2.31
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 03:33 and never touched — 62.5% is still 62.5%
Graded at full timeKacper Adamus to win
62.5%
62.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
79 points played in total.
Set by set
1311911117116––
H2H Kacper Adamus 7–2 Karol Jablonski Karol Jablonski has won 2 of their 9 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 03:33What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.50 (61%)
Adamus
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
7-2 in 9
Adamus
Correct
gap of 5 in 9, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Adamus 1411 vs Jablonski 1369
Adamus
Correct
both rated, 43 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Adamus 40% vs Jablonski 60%
Jablonski
Wrong
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Adamus 60% vs Jablonski 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Adamus -1 · Jablonski -2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 62% — Clear lean (leans Adamus)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Jablonski form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (43%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAdamus 1.50 / Jablonski 2.31
Signal prob.62% / 38%
Edge (Adamus)+1.6pp
TT Elite Series · #13107617
Adamus1.50
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As favourite61% won 367 of 599
Up 2–0, closes it98% 201 of 206
Up 1–0, closes it79% 292 of 369
Jablonski2.31
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog41% won 30 of 74
Down 0–1, comes back27% 12 of 44
Down 0–2, comes back17% 4 of 24
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 9 meetings
HomeAdamus7wins
AwayJablonski2wins
5 of 9 to a deciderAdamus leads 7–2, and 5 of those 9 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeAdamus80%4 of 5
AwayJablonski25%1 of 4
Set by set, in these 9 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Adamus5Jablonski4n = 9Adamus took 5 of 9
S2Adamus8Jablonski1n = 9Adamus took 8 of 9
S3Adamus6Jablonski3n = 9Adamus took 6 of 9
S4Adamus3Jablonski2n = 5Adamus took 3 of 5
S5Adamus3Jablonski2n = 5Adamus took 3 of 5
How those 9 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 9 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home444%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home333%
2–3Decider, away222%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 9 meetings
MetricAdamusJablonskiA − JBasisWins72+5in 9 meetingsFirst set54+1of 9Avg pointsper match40.933.3+7.6per matchSweeps40+43–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAdamusJablonskiBasisWin rate · lifetime934 / 1730 vs 69 / 15154%45.7%934 / 1730 vs 69 / 151Avg sets wonper match2.11.9per matchAvg pointsper match38.338.6per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
AdamusAdamus 1.50/Jablonski 2.31
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
62.2%
Adamus · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Adamus won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record9
WJul 23 · 15:10K. Adamus—1111113K. Jablonski—9970
WJul 16 · 15:10K. Adamus—1111123K. Jablonski—37100
LJul 15 · 15:55K. Adamus—71111992K. Jablonski—117811113
WJul 15 · 09:55K. Adamus—411611113K. Jablonski—11311972
WJul 22 · 11:30K. Adamus—1111113K. Jablonski—7510
WJul 22 · 07:10K. Adamus—1111113K. Jablonski—4760
WJul 9 · 07:10K. Adamus—411914113K. Jablonski—119111282
LJun 26 · 18:00K. Adamus—11911792K. Jablonski—811411113
WJun 12 · 16:00K. Adamus—1011611113K. Jablonski—12411852
K. Adamus10
LSep 10 · 12:20J. Pelka2.36111212113K. Adamus1.487141041WSep 10 · 11:05K. Adamus1.851111113O. Jadach1.858790LSep 10 · 09:30K. Adamus2.029101191K. Hetnar1.6511127113WSep 10 · 08:20K. Adamus1.511212113J. Pelka2.28101050LSep 10 · 06:45K. Adamus1.52128111192W. Glanowski2.35141179113WSep 10 · 05:30K. Adamus1.50111011133K. Jablonski2.317125111WSep 9 · 17:05M. Rus3.85510100K. Adamus1.191112123LSep 9 · 15:55K. Adamus1.67511881W. Urban2.1011511113WSep 9 · 14:45W. Buczynski2.601031181K. Adamus1.4112115113WSep 9 · 13:30B. Madej3.20115131182K. Adamus1.305111113113
K. Jablonski10
LSep 10 · 11:30K. Hetnar1.6011116113K. Jablonski2.15941161LSep 10 · 10:40J. Pelka1.83117117113K. Jablonski1.8191171152WSep 10 · 09:55O. Jadach1.709101181K. Jablonski2.0011126113WSep 10 · 07:55W. Glanowski1.801114731K. Jablonski1.8551611113WSep 10 · 07:10K. Hetnar1.49118831K. Jablonski2.4581111113LSep 10 · 05:30K. Adamus1.50111011133K. Jablonski2.317125111LAug 14 · 16:40K. Jablonski6.706817101P. Polok1.06111115123WAug 14 · 15:05M. Adamus3.00611111182K. Jablonski1.33111355113WAug 14 · 14:20O. Sokolowski2.358111281K. Jablonski1.5211414113WAug 14 · 13:30K. Jablonski2.35611911113J. Kaczmarek1.5011611982
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.