TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13106091
Played Sep 10Finished
Kacper Adamus
Home
1.52
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
8–2Last 10Won last 2
Final
2 – 3
Set by set
1214811117119911
Waldemar Glanowski
Away
2.35
At publish
Lost last 10Form at publish
0–10Last 10Lost last 10
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:06 and never touched — 81.5% is still 81.5%
Graded at full timeKacper Adamus to win
81.5%
81.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
103 points played in total.
Set by set
1214811117119911
H2H Kacper Adamus 6–1 Waldemar Glanowski Waldemar Glanowski has won 1 of their 7 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 20:06What took a side5 for · 1 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.52 (61%)
Adamus
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
6-1 in 7
Adamus
Wrong
gap of 5 in 7, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Adamus 1439 vs Glanowski 1225
Adamus
Wrong
both rated, 214 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Adamus 80% vs Glanowski 0%
Adamus
Wrong
80pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Adamus 80% vs Glanowski 0%
Adamus
Wrong
80pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Adamus +2 · Glanowski -5
Glanowski
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 65% — Clear lean (leans Adamus) · live re-read · sealed at 82% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Glanowski form (0%) is below what odds imply (43%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAdamus 1.52 / Glanowski 2.35
Signal prob.65% / 35%
Edge (Adamus)+4.0pp
TT Elite Series · #13106091
Adamus1.52
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite61% won 367 of 599
Up 2–0, closes it98% 201 of 206
Up 1–0, closes it79% 292 of 369
Glanowski2.35
0%won 0 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 10
oldest → newest10%takes the first set · 1 of 10
As underdog32% won 79 of 244
Down 0–1, comes back14% 17 of 125
Down 0–2, comes back4% 3 of 70
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 7 meetings
HomeAdamus6wins
AwayGlanowski1wins
1 of 7 to a deciderAdamus leads 6–1, and 1 of those 7 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeAdamus100%4 of 4
AwayGlanowski33.3%1 of 3
Set by set, in these 7 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Adamus4Glanowski3n = 7Adamus took 4 of 7
S2Adamus4Glanowski3n = 7Adamus took 4 of 7
S3Adamus4Glanowski3n = 7Adamus took 4 of 7
S4Adamus5Glanowski1n = 6Adamus took 5 of 6
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 7 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 7 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home571%
3–2Decider, home114%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away114%
These 7 meetings
MetricAdamusGlanowskiA − GBasisWins61+5in 7 meetingsFirst set43+1of 7Avg pointsper match40.137.4+2.7per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAdamusGlanowskiBasisWin rate · lifetime933 / 1726 vs 397 / 73654.1%53.9%933 / 1726 vs 397 / 736Avg sets wonper match2.12.1per matchAvg pointsper match38.337.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
AdamusAdamus 1.52/Glanowski 2.35
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
64.7%
Adamus · sealed before the serve
What happened
2–3
Glanowski won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record7
WSep 1 · 07:55K. Adamus—17511113W. Glanowski—1511861
WMar 17 · 15:45K. Adamus—411117113W. Glanowski—11761182
WMar 17 · 12:05K. Adamus—11911113W. Glanowski—811881
WMar 11 · 16:55K. Adamus—11116173W. Glanowski—4711151
LMar 11 · 10:55K. Adamus—10590W. Glanowski—1211113
WMar 4 · 14:30K. Adamus—15117113W. Glanowski—1381191
WMar 4 · 08:30K. Adamus—51111113W. Glanowski—115971
K. Adamus10
WSep 10 · 08:20K. Adamus1.511212113J. Pelka2.28101050WSep 10 · 05:30K. Adamus1.50111011133K. Jablonski2.317125111WSep 9 · 17:05M. Rus3.85510100K. Adamus1.191112123LSep 9 · 15:55K. Adamus1.67511881W. Urban2.1011511113WSep 9 · 14:45W. Buczynski2.601031181K. Adamus1.4112115113WSep 9 · 13:30B. Madej3.20115131182K. Adamus1.305111113113WSep 9 · 11:55S. Juzek2.486660K. Adamus1.431111113LSep 9 · 11:05K. Adamus1.42111111772W. Buczynski2.55513611113WSep 9 · 09:30K. Adamus1.21111197113M. Rus3.7096111192WSep 9 · 08:20K. Adamus1.231711113B. Madej3.5015120
W. Glanowski10
LSep 10 · 09:05W. Glanowski2.0341161592J. Pelka1.651141113113LSep 10 · 07:55W. Glanowski1.801114731K. Jablonski1.8551611113LSep 10 · 05:55W. Glanowski3.0064100O. Jadach1.311111123LSep 3 · 16:20W. Glanowski2.80116771O. Jadach1.3761111113LSep 3 · 15:05W. Glanowski3.40131170R. Skotniczny1.251513113LSep 3 · 13:55W. Glanowski1.80712101182P. Slosarczyk1.911110128113LSep 3 · 12:45K. Slawinski1.2911613113W. Glanowski3.208111181LSep 3 · 11:55W. Glanowski2.42612531P. Polok1.48111011113LSep 3 · 10:20K. Slawinski1.26113512113W. Glanowski3.35811111082LSep 3 · 09:30O. Jadach1.3311114133W. Glanowski3.208411111
Upcoming Matches
K. Adamus
W. Glanowski
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.