TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13084519
Played Sep 5Finished
Andriej Fomin
Home
2.75
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
6111012911––––
Jacek Oracz
Away
1.40
At publish
Won last 4Form at publish
8–2Last 10Won last 4
The read, and what happenedsealed at 20:52 and never touched — 69.5% is still 69.5%
Graded at full timeJacek Oracz to win
69.5%
69.5%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
59 points played in total.
Set by set
6111012911––––
H2H Andriej Fomin 16–29 Jacek Oracz Andriej Fomin has won 16 of their 45 meetings.
Last 10 · 5–5Head to head
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 20:52What took a side6 for · 0 against · 0 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.40 (66%)
Oracz
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
16-29 in 45
Oracz
Correct
gap of 13 in 45, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Fomin 1441 vs Oracz 1579
Oracz
Correct
both rated, 138 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Fomin 40% vs Oracz 80%
Oracz
Correct
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Fomin 50% vs Oracz 80%
Oracz
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Fomin +1 · Oracz +4
Oracz
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
6 for, 0 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 70% — Clear lean (leans Oracz)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsFomin 2.75 / Oracz 1.40
Signal prob.31% / 70%
Edge (Oracz)+3.2pp
TT Elite Series · #13084519
Fomin2.75
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
30%takes the first set · 3 of 10
As underdog48% won 70 of 147
Down 0–1, comes back36% 27 of 75
Down 0–2, comes back5% 2 of 39
Oracz1.40
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
Won last 4
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As favourite72% won 302 of 422
Up 2–0, closes it98% 189 of 192
Up 1–0, closes it88% 246 of 281
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeFomin5wins
AwayOracz5wins
2 of 10 to a deciderLevel at 5–5, and 2 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeFomin50%2 of 4
AwayOracz50%3 of 6
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Fomin4Oracz6n = 10Oracz took 6 of 10
S2Fomin4Oracz6n = 10Oracz took 6 of 10
S3Fomin5Oracz5n = 10split evenly
S4Fomin4Oracz3n = 7Fomin took 4 of 7
S5
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home440%
3–2Decider, home110%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away330%
These 10 meetings
MetricFominOraczF − OBasisWins550in 10 meetingsFirst set46−2of 10Avg pointsper match36.438.8−2.4per matchSweeps03−33–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricFominOraczBasisWin rate · lifetime511 / 877 vs 656 / 91258.3%71.9%511 / 877 vs 656 / 912Avg sets wonper match2.12.5per matchAvg pointsper match38.039.3per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
OraczFomin 2.75/Oracz 1.40
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
69.5%
Oracz · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Oracz won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
LSep 5 · 16:50A. Fomin—6570J. Oracz—1111113
WAug 22 · 22:00A. Fomin—611126113J. Oracz—119101172
LAug 22 · 18:00A. Fomin—117671J. Oracz—71111113
WJul 11 · 22:00A. Fomin—91111113J. Oracz—117661
WJul 11 · 18:00A. Fomin—81312183J. Oracz—111110161
WJul 10 · 24:10A. Fomin—12912113J. Oracz—10111081
LJul 9 · 20:30A. Fomin—111111282J. Oracz—713711113
LJun 27 · 22:00A. Fomin—6860J. Oracz—1111113
WJun 27 · 18:00A. Fomin—11116113J. Oracz—971151
LJun 14 · 02:00A. Fomin—1010100J. Oracz—1212123
A. Fomin10
LSep 6 · 02:45A. Fomin3.3081180H. Tkaczyk1.271113113WSep 6 · 01:10A. Fomin1.70111188113C. Pawlik1.9558111182WSep 6 · 24:00A. Fomin1.5491311113K. Gudzik2.251111891LSep 5 · 22:25A. Fomin1.8711621192A. Krezel1.80511117113WSep 5 · 20:00A. Krezel1.907830A. Fomin1.801111113LSep 5 · 19:10C. Pawlik1.761511113A. Fomin1.9513690LSep 5 · 18:25A. Fomin3.40611961H. Tkaczyk1.2611711113LSep 5 · 16:50A. Fomin2.706570J. Oracz1.391111113WSep 5 · 16:00K. Gudzik2.25117871A. Fomin1.5491111113LSep 3 · 01:45A. Fomin2.0051170M. Lewczuk1.731113113
J. Oracz10
WSep 6 · 02:20K. Gudzik2.806750J. Oracz1.391111113LSep 6 · 01:35H. Tkaczyk2.3512811113J. Oracz1.531011471LSep 5 · 23:35A. Krezel2.65111110113J. Oracz1.40651291WSep 5 · 22:50C. Pawlik1.807590J. Oracz1.851111113WSep 5 · 20:20K. Gudzik2.60117581J. Oracz1.4281111113WSep 5 · 19:35H. Tkaczyk2.005760J. Oracz1.661111113WSep 5 · 17:35A. Krezel2.6097111172J. Oracz1.41111129113WSep 5 · 16:50A. Fomin2.706570J. Oracz1.391111113LSep 5 · 15:10C. Pawlik1.83111011113J. Oracz1.83912991WSep 5 · 02:20A. Zmijewski2.4041311772J. Oracz1.501111811113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.