TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13080903
Played Sep 5Finished
Kacper Adamus
Home
2.45
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Won last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
611811511––––
Piotr Zemla
Away
1.47
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
The read, and what happenedsealed at 03:48 and never touched — 63.1% is still 63.1%
Graded at full timePiotr Zemla to win
63.1%
63.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
52 points played in total.
Set by set
611811511––––
H2H Kacper Adamus 0–2 Piotr Zemla Kacper Adamus has won 0 of their 2 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 03:48What took a side2 for · 0 against · 4 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.47 (63%)
Zemla
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-2 in 2
—
Too close
2 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Adamus 1401 vs Zemla 1453
Zemla
Correct
both rated, 52 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Adamus 40% vs Zemla 40%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Adamus 40% vs Zemla 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Adamus +1 · Zemla +1
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 4 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 63% — Clear lean (leans Zemla) · live re-read · sealed at 63% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Zemla form (40%) is below what odds imply (68%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAdamus 2.45 / Zemla 1.47
Signal prob.38% / 63%
Edge (Zemla)+0.0pp
TT Elite Series · #13080903
Adamus2.45
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog49% won 119 of 245
Down 0–1, comes back23% 27 of 119
Down 0–2, comes back5% 3 of 63
Zemla1.47
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As favourite64% won 41 of 64
Up 2–0, closes it93% 26 of 28
Up 1–0, closes it73% 30 of 41
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 2 meetings
HomeAdamus0wins
AwayZemla2wins
Zemla leads 2–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 2 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 2 finishedn = 2, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away0
0–3Straight, away2
These 2 meetings
MetricAdamusZemlaA − ZBasisWins02−2in 2 meetingsFirst set02−2of 2Avg pointsper match15.533.0−17.5per matchSweeps02−23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAdamusZemlaBasisWin rate · lifetime919 / 1704 vs 42 / 7053.9%60%919 / 1704 vs 42 / 70Avg sets wonper match2.12.3per matchAvg pointsper match38.338.5per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ZemlaAdamus 2.45/Zemla 1.47
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
62.5%
Zemla · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Zemla won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record2
LSep 5 · 06:00K. Adamus—6850P. Zemla—1111113
LJul 18 · 05:10K. Adamus—3630P. Zemla—1111113
K. Adamus10
WSep 5 · 08:45K. Adamus1.4711119143W. Pytlas2.458611121WSep 5 · 07:10K. Adamus1.66118115113J. Jesiek2.1081191162WSep 5 · 04:25K. Adamus1.391111113R. Adach2.706740LSep 5 · 03:10K. Adamus1.3598111492O. Sokolowski2.801111712113WSep 4 · 02:00K. Hetnar1.5110101191K. Adamus2.3412129113LSep 4 · 01:10A. Ruszkiewicz2.5014812133K. Adamus1.45121110111LSep 4 · 24:25K. Adamus1.35981212102G. Jurowicz2.9511111010123LSep 3 · 22:50K. Adamus1.88781191M. Tkocz1.8211115113LSep 3 · 22:00M. Lebek2.0511113113K. Adamus1.66961181WSep 3 · 20:45K. Adamus1.3311811113G. Jurowicz2.95611891
P. Zemla10
WSep 5 · 08:20P. Zemla1.511111113O. Sokolowski2.408950WSep 5 · 06:45R. Adach4.007180P. Zemla1.211111113WSep 5 · 05:10P. Zemla1.521111113W. Pytlas2.329450LSep 5 · 04:00P. Zemla1.4711412892J. Jesiek2.453111011113LSep 1 · 20:00P. Zemla2.331071141P. Gasiorski1.5112119113WSep 1 · 18:45P. Zemla1.441111811113W. Pytlas2.6098111382LSep 1 · 17:35P. Zemla1.63115761M. Tkocz2.0981111113LSep 1 · 16:25P. Kaczynski2.50111113113P. Zemla1.45461551WSep 1 · 15:35P. Zemla1.261111113R. Adach3.406350WAug 30 · 08:00P. Zemla1.491111113W. Pytlas2.457550
Upcoming Matches
K. Adamus
P. Zemla
Nothing scheduled
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.