TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13059675
Played Sep 1Finished
Piotr Zemla
Home
1.44
At publish
Lost last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Lost last 2
Final
3 – 2
Set by set
1191188111113118
Wojciech Pytlas
Away
2.60
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
6–4Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 16:25 and never touched — 65.8% is still 65.8%
Graded at full timePiotr Zemla to win
65.8%
65.8%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
101 points played in total.
Set by set
1191188111113118
H2H Piotr Zemla 4–1 Wojciech Pytlas Wojciech Pytlas has won 1 of their 5 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 16:25What took a side2 for · 1 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.44 (64%)
Zemla
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
4-1 in 5
Zemla
Correct
gap of 3 in 5, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Zemla 1414 vs Pytlas 1429
Pytlas
Wrong
both rated, 15 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Zemla 60% vs Pytlas 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Zemla 50% vs Pytlas 60%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Zemla -2 · Pytlas +2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 66% — Clear lean (leans Zemla)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Pytlas form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (38%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsZemla 1.44 / Pytlas 2.60
Signal prob.66% / 34%
Edge (Zemla)+1.2pp
TT Elite Series · #13059675
Zemla1.44
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 2
oldest → newest80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As favourite64% won 35 of 55
Up 2–0, closes it91% 20 of 22
Up 1–0, closes it73% 24 of 33
Pytlas2.60
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest50%takes the first set · 5 of 10
As underdog47% won 60 of 128
Down 0–1, comes back32% 25 of 79
Down 0–2, comes back13% 5 of 40
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 5 meetings
HomeZemla4wins
AwayPytlas1wins
1 of 5 to a deciderZemla leads 4–1, and 1 of those 5 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeZemla80%4 of 5
AwayPytlasn = 0, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 5 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Zemla5Pytlas0n = 5Zemla took 5 of 5
S2Zemla4Pytlas1n = 5Zemla took 4 of 5
S3Zemla3Pytlas2n = 5Zemla took 3 of 5
S4Zemla2Pytlas1n = 3Zemla took 2 of 3
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 5 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 5 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home240%
3–1Four sets, home240%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away120%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 5 meetings
MetricZemlaPytlasZ − PBasisWins41+3in 5 meetingsFirst set50+5of 5Avg pointsper match39.231.4+7.8per matchSweeps20+23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricZemlaPytlasBasisWin rate · lifetime37 / 63 vs 387 / 72858.7%53.2%37 / 63 vs 387 / 728Avg sets wonper match2.32.0per matchAvg pointsper match38.737.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ZemlaZemla 1.44/Pytlas 2.60
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
65.6%
Zemla · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–2
Zemla won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record5
WAug 30 · 08:00P. Zemla—1111113W. Pytlas—7550
LAug 19 · 17:10P. Zemla—121192102W. Pytlas—1051111123
WAug 9 · 04:00P. Zemla—1111113W. Pytlas—5850
WJul 26 · 04:00P. Zemla—13116123W. Pytlas—11311101
WJul 22 · 15:10P. Zemla—121011113W. Pytlas—1012881
P. Zemla10
WSep 5 · 08:20P. Zemla1.511111113O. Sokolowski2.408950WSep 5 · 06:45R. Adach4.007180P. Zemla1.211111113WSep 5 · 06:00K. Adamus2.456850P. Zemla1.471111113WSep 5 · 05:10P. Zemla1.521111113W. Pytlas2.329450LSep 5 · 04:00P. Zemla1.4711412892J. Jesiek2.453111011113LSep 1 · 20:00P. Zemla2.331071141P. Gasiorski1.5112119113LSep 1 · 17:35P. Zemla1.63115761M. Tkocz2.0981111113LSep 1 · 16:25P. Kaczynski2.50111113113P. Zemla1.45461551WSep 1 · 15:35P. Zemla1.261111113R. Adach3.406350WAug 30 · 08:00P. Zemla1.491111113W. Pytlas2.457550
W. Pytlas10
LSep 6 · 08:45W. Pytlas1.371111111042P. Slosarczyk2.75136612113LSep 6 · 07:10W. Pytlas1.494570R. Idaczyk2.451111113LSep 6 · 06:00W. Pytlas1.57712381K. Juszczyk2.25111011113LSep 6 · 04:25W. Pytlas1.30481191G. Sawicki3.1011119113LSep 6 · 03:10W. Pytlas2.1668100K. Hetnar1.591111123LSep 5 · 08:45K. Adamus1.4711119143W. Pytlas2.458611121WSep 5 · 07:35W. Pytlas1.5511119113O. Sokolowski2.25561191WSep 5 · 06:25J. Jesiek2.1011911962W. Pytlas1.65811811113LSep 5 · 05:10P. Zemla1.521111113W. Pytlas2.329450LAug 30 · 08:00P. Zemla1.491111113W. Pytlas2.457550
Upcoming Matches
P. Zemla
Nothing scheduled
W. Pytlas
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.