TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13046183
Played Aug 30Finished
Piotr Zemla
Home
1.49
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 0
Set by set
117115115––––
Wojciech Pytlas
Away
2.45
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 06:28 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timePiotr Zemla to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
50 points played in total.
Set by set
117115115––––
H2H Piotr Zemla 3–1 Wojciech Pytlas Wojciech Pytlas has won 1 of their 4 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 06:28What took a side2 for · 3 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.49 (62%)
Zemla
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
3-1 in 4
Zemla
Correct
gap of 2 in 4, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Zemla 1416 vs Pytlas 1427
Pytlas
Wrong
both rated, 10 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Zemla 40% vs Pytlas 80%
Pytlas
Wrong
40pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Zemla 50% vs Pytlas 50%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Zemla +1 · Pytlas +3
Pytlas
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 62% — Clear lean (leans Zemla) · live re-read · sealed at 54% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Pytlas form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (41%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsZemla 1.49 / Pytlas 2.45
Signal prob.62% / 38%
Edge (Zemla)+0.0pp
TT Elite Series · #13046183
Zemla1.49
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
80%takes the first set · 8 of 10
As favourite63% won 32 of 51
Up 2–0, closes it90% 18 of 20
Up 1–0, closes it72% 21 of 29
Pytlas2.45
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest20%takes the first set · 2 of 10
As underdog47% won 60 of 127
Down 0–1, comes back32% 25 of 78
Down 0–2, comes back13% 5 of 39
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 4 meetings
HomeZemla3wins
AwayPytlas1wins
1 of 4 to a deciderZemla leads 3–1, and 1 of those 4 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeZemla75%3 of 4
AwayPytlasn = 0, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 4 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Zemla4Pytlas0n = 4Zemla took 4 of 4
S2Zemla3Pytlas1n = 4Zemla took 3 of 4
S3Zemla2Pytlas2n = 4split evenly
S4Zemla2Pytlas1n = 3Zemla took 2 of 3
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 4 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 4 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home125%
3–1Four sets, home250%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away125%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 4 meetings
MetricZemlaPytlasZ − PBasisWins31+2in 4 meetingsFirst set40+4of 4Avg pointsper match40.835.0+5.8per matchSweeps10+13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricZemlaPytlasBasisWin rate · lifetime35 / 59 vs 385 / 72459.3%53.2%35 / 59 vs 385 / 724Avg sets wonper match2.32.0per matchAvg pointsper match39.237.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
ZemlaZemla 1.49/Pytlas 2.45
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
62.2%
Zemla · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–0
Zemla won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record4
LAug 19 · 17:10P. Zemla—121192102W. Pytlas—1051111123
WAug 9 · 04:00P. Zemla—1111113W. Pytlas—5850
WJul 26 · 04:00P. Zemla—13116123W. Pytlas—11311101
WJul 22 · 15:10P. Zemla—121011113W. Pytlas—1012881
P. Zemla10
WSep 5 · 08:20P. Zemla1.511111113O. Sokolowski2.408950WSep 5 · 06:45R. Adach4.007180P. Zemla1.211111113WSep 5 · 06:00K. Adamus2.456850P. Zemla1.471111113WSep 5 · 05:10P. Zemla1.521111113W. Pytlas2.329450LSep 5 · 04:00P. Zemla1.4711412892J. Jesiek2.453111011113LSep 1 · 20:00P. Zemla2.331071141P. Gasiorski1.5112119113WSep 1 · 18:45P. Zemla1.441111811113W. Pytlas2.6098111382LSep 1 · 17:35P. Zemla1.63115761M. Tkocz2.0981111113LSep 1 · 16:25P. Kaczynski2.50111113113P. Zemla1.45461551WSep 1 · 15:35P. Zemla1.261111113R. Adach3.406350
W. Pytlas10
LSep 6 · 08:45W. Pytlas1.371111111042P. Slosarczyk2.75136612113LSep 6 · 07:10W. Pytlas1.494570R. Idaczyk2.451111113LSep 6 · 06:00W. Pytlas1.57712381K. Juszczyk2.25111011113LSep 6 · 04:25W. Pytlas1.30481191G. Sawicki3.1011119113LSep 6 · 03:10W. Pytlas2.1668100K. Hetnar1.591111123LSep 5 · 08:45K. Adamus1.4711119143W. Pytlas2.458611121WSep 5 · 07:35W. Pytlas1.5511119113O. Sokolowski2.25561191WSep 5 · 06:25J. Jesiek2.1011911962W. Pytlas1.65811811113LSep 5 · 05:10P. Zemla1.521111113W. Pytlas2.329450LSep 1 · 18:45P. Zemla1.441111811113W. Pytlas2.6098111382
Upcoming Matches
P. Zemla
Nothing scheduled
W. Pytlas
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.