TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series
TT Elite SeriesMatch #13081549
Played Sep 5Finished
Kacper Adamus
Home
1.47
At publish
Won last 1Form at publish
4–6Last 10Won last 1
Final
3 – 1
Set by set
1181169111412––
Wojciech Pytlas
Away
2.45
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 08:00 and never touched — 64.1% is still 64.1%
Graded at full timeKacper Adamus to win
64.1%
64.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
82 points played in total.
Set by set
1181169111412––
H2H Kacper Adamus 26–6 Wojciech Pytlas Wojciech Pytlas has won 6 of their 32 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 08:00What took a side2 for · 1 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.47 (63%)
Adamus
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
26-6 in 32
Adamus
Correct
gap of 20 in 32, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Adamus 1387 vs Pytlas 1421
Pytlas
Wrong
both rated, 33 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Adamus 60% vs Pytlas 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Adamus 40% vs Pytlas 50%
—
Too close
10pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Adamus +1 · Pytlas +2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 64% — Clear lean (leans Adamus)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Pytlas form (60%) outperforms what odds imply (41%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAdamus 1.47 / Pytlas 2.45
Signal prob.64% / 36%
Edge (Adamus)+1.6pp
TT Elite Series · #13081549
Adamus1.47
40%won 4 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite61% won 359 of 593
Up 2–0, closes it98% 196 of 201
Up 1–0, closes it78% 286 of 367
Pytlas2.45
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog46% won 58 of 127
Down 0–1, comes back32% 25 of 79
Down 0–2, comes back13% 5 of 40
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeAdamus9wins
AwayPytlas1wins
3 of 10 to a deciderAdamus leads 9–1, and 3 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeAdamus88.9%8 of 9
AwayPytlasn = 1, below the 3 needed
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Adamus9Pytlas1n = 10Adamus took 9 of 10
S2Adamus6Pytlas4n = 10Adamus took 6 of 10
S3Adamus8Pytlas2n = 10Adamus took 8 of 10
S4Adamus4Pytlas1n = 5Adamus took 4 of 5
S5Adamus2Pytlas1n = 3Adamus took 2 of 3
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home550%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home220%
2–3Decider, away110%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away00%
These 10 meetings
MetricAdamusPytlasA − PBasisWins91+8in 10 meetingsFirst set91+8of 10Avg pointsper match39.530.4+9.1per matchSweeps50+53–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAdamusPytlasBasisWin rate · lifetime925 / 1713 vs 390 / 73454%53.1%925 / 1713 vs 390 / 734Avg sets wonper match2.12.0per matchAvg pointsper match38.337.2per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
AdamusAdamus 1.47/Pytlas 2.45
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
64.1%
Adamus · sealed before the serve
What happened
3–1
Adamus won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WAug 29 · 04:25K. Adamus—13711113W. Pytlas—1111481
LAug 27 · 20:45K. Adamus—11981192W. Pytlas—711117113
WAug 8 · 04:25K. Adamus—1141110113W. Pytlas—51161232
WAug 1 · 04:50K. Adamus—1111113W. Pytlas—6560
WJul 30 · 16:25K. Adamus—711612113W. Pytlas—119111092
WJul 23 · 19:10K. Adamus—1111123W. Pytlas—38100
WJul 9 · 15:10K. Adamus—11814113W. Pytlas—8111271
WJul 4 · 06:25K. Adamus—1111113W. Pytlas—7690
WJun 20 · 03:10K. Adamus—1211113W. Pytlas—10360
WJun 11 · 19:10K. Adamus—1111113W. Pytlas—7480
K. Adamus10
WSep 5 · 07:10K. Adamus1.66118115113J. Jesiek2.1081191162LSep 5 · 06:00K. Adamus2.456850P. Zemla1.471111113WSep 5 · 04:25K. Adamus1.391111113R. Adach2.706740LSep 5 · 03:10K. Adamus1.3598111492O. Sokolowski2.801111712113WSep 4 · 02:00K. Hetnar1.5110101191K. Adamus2.3412129113LSep 4 · 01:10A. Ruszkiewicz2.5014812133K. Adamus1.45121110111LSep 4 · 24:25K. Adamus1.35981212102G. Jurowicz2.9511111010123LSep 3 · 22:50K. Adamus1.88781191M. Tkocz1.8211115113LSep 3 · 22:00M. Lebek2.0511113113K. Adamus1.66961181WSep 3 · 20:45K. Adamus1.3311811113G. Jurowicz2.95611891
W. Pytlas10
LSep 6 · 08:45W. Pytlas1.371111111042P. Slosarczyk2.75136612113LSep 6 · 07:10W. Pytlas1.494570R. Idaczyk2.451111113LSep 6 · 06:00W. Pytlas1.57712381K. Juszczyk2.25111011113LSep 6 · 04:25W. Pytlas1.30481191G. Sawicki3.1011119113LSep 6 · 03:10W. Pytlas2.1668100K. Hetnar1.591111123WSep 5 · 07:35W. Pytlas1.5511119113O. Sokolowski2.25561191WSep 5 · 06:25J. Jesiek2.1011911962W. Pytlas1.65811811113LSep 5 · 05:10P. Zemla1.521111113W. Pytlas2.329450WSep 5 · 03:35R. Adach2.95118691W. Pytlas1.3341111113LSep 1 · 20:20W. Pytlas2.101121071M. Tkocz1.6771112113
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.