TT Lossbeater/Challenger Series TT
Challenger Series TTMatch #12359498
Played Aug 6Finished
Sven Happek
Home
No price at publish
Lost last 4Form at publish
2–8Last 10Lost last 4
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
711711116611––
Tobias Saltzer
Away
No price at publish
Won last 2Form at publish
8–2Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 07:05 and never touched — 70.0% is still 70.0%
Graded at full timeTobias Saltzer to win
70.0%
70.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightno pick shipped
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
70 points played in total.
Set by set
711711116611––
H2H Sven Happek 1–2 Tobias Saltzer Sven Happek has won 1 of their 3 meetings.
The pickNo pick published
Sealed 07:05What took a side3 for · 1 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
1-2 in 3
—
Too close
gap of 1, under the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Happek 1194 vs Saltzer 1587
Saltzer
Correct
both rated, 393 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Happek 20% vs Saltzer 80%
Saltzer
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Happek 20% vs Saltzer 80%
Saltzer
Correct
60pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Happek -4 · Saltzer +2
Happek
Wrong
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
3 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 70% — Strong (leans Saltzer)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
Challenger Series TT · #12359498
Happek
20%won 2 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 4
oldest → newest10%takes the first set · 1 of 10
Saltzer
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 3 meetings
HomeHappek1wins
AwaySaltzer2wins
Saltzer leads 2–1.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 3 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Happek2Saltzer1n = 3Happek took 2 of 3
S2Happek0Saltzer3n = 3Saltzer took 3 of 3
S3Happek1Saltzer2n = 3Saltzer took 2 of 3
S4
Only 2 matches reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 3 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 3 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home133%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away00%
1–3Four sets, away133%
0–3Straight, away133%
These 3 meetings
MetricHappekSaltzerH − SBasisWins12−1in 3 meetingsFirst set21+1of 3Avg pointsper match33.336.7−3.4per matchSweeps01−13–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricHappekSaltzerBasisWin rate · lifetime52 / 171 vs 40 / 8230.4%48.8%52 / 171 vs 40 / 82Avg sets wonper match1.41.8per matchAvg pointsper match32.134.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
SaltzerRead onlywould have hit
What we said
70%
Saltzer · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Saltzer won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record3
LJul 6 · 10:00S. Happek—118971T. Saltzer—61111113
LJun 8 · 09:30S. Happek—7690T. Saltzer—1111113
WAug 15 · 06:30S. Happek—11911123T. Saltzer—8119101
S. Happek10
LAug 7 · 07:30D. Zech1.831111113S. Happek1.839270WAug 6 · 17:30S. Happek1.803111110113T. Freund1.9111631272LAug 6 · 16:00A. Mino1.0481111113S. Happek9.00115431LAug 6 · 14:00K. Fadeev1.071111113S. Happek7.507970LAug 6 · 12:00S. Happek4.005940K. Zimmermann1.221111113LAug 6 · 08:00S. Happek2.50681181L. Kraus1.5011119113LJul 28 · 08:30S. Happek8.503570O. Kosolosky1.051111113LJul 28 · 06:30S. Happek1.201011101192K. Moosmann4.33125122113LJul 27 · 16:00S. Happek—611571J. Loffler—11811113WJul 27 · 12:30S. Happek1.871111113N. Kizakisz1.838420
T. Saltzer10
LAug 7 · 08:30A. Mino1.3711115113T. Saltzer2.85171181LAug 6 · 17:00K. Fadeev—1211113T. Saltzer—10720LAug 6 · 15:30T. Saltzer—9660K. Zimmermann—1111113WAug 6 · 13:00T. Saltzer—1211113T. Freund—10890LAug 6 · 11:30L. Kraus2.151161110113T. Saltzer1.6351171272WAug 6 · 07:30D. Zech1.3011911892T. Saltzer3.20711811113WJul 7 · 10:40K. Fadeev—115651T. Saltzer—91111113LJul 7 · 09:45T. Saltzer3.855116101E. Mendes1.2011711123WJul 7 · 07:00K. Fadeev1.14112931T. Saltzer4.7091111113WJul 6 · 17:30C. Schmitt—571361T. Saltzer—111111113
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.