TT Lossbeater/Challenger Series TT
Challenger Series TTMatch #13127635
Played Sep 14Finished
Tobias Saltzer
Home
No price at publish
Lost last 3Form at publish
3–7Last 10Lost last 3
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
611911411––––
Enio Mendes
Away
No price at publish
Lost last 3Form at publish
6–4Last 10Lost last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 04:11 and never touched — 66.0% is still 66.0%
Graded at full timeEnio Mendes to win
66.0%
66.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
52 points played in total.
Set by set
611911411––––
H2H Tobias Saltzer 0–3 Enio Mendes Tobias Saltzer has won 0 of their 3 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 04:11What took a side4 for · 0 against · 2 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
No price
—
No value
no price published for this match
H2H
0-3 in 3
Mendes
Correct
gap of 3 in 3, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Saltzer 1540 vs Mendes 1841
Mendes
Correct
both rated, 301 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Saltzer 20% vs Mendes 40%
Mendes
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Saltzer 30% vs Mendes 60%
Mendes
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Saltzer -3 · Mendes -3
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
4 for, 2 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 60% — Slight lean (leans Mendes) · live re-read · sealed at 66% before the first serve
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
No odds data available
Challenger Series TT · #13127635
Saltzer
30%won 3 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 3
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
Mendes
60%won 6 of 10 · last 10
Lost last 3
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 3 meetings
HomeSaltzer0wins
AwayMendes3wins
1 of 3 to a deciderMendes leads 3–0, and 1 of those 3 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in these 3 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Saltzer1Mendes2n = 3Mendes took 2 of 3
S2Saltzer0Mendes3n = 3Mendes took 3 of 3
S3Saltzer0Mendes3n = 3Mendes took 3 of 3
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S5
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How those 3 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 3 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home00%
3–1Four sets, home00%
3–2Decider, home00%
2–3Decider, away133%
1–3Four sets, away00%
0–3Straight, away267%
These 3 meetings
MetricSaltzerMendesS − MBasisWins03−3in 3 meetingsFirst set12−1of 3Avg pointsper match26.041.0−15.0per matchSweeps02−23–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricSaltzerMendesBasisWin rate · lifetime39 / 83 vs 40 / 5547%72.7%39 / 83 vs 40 / 55Avg sets wonper match1.82.5per matchAvg pointsper match34.238.0per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
MendesRead onlywould have hit
What we said
59.7%
Mendes · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Mendes won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record3
LJul 6 · 13:00T. Saltzer154470E. Mendes331111113
LJun 9 · 09:45T. Saltzer42113101262E. Mendes539111210113
LJun 8 · 13:00T. Saltzer2113530E. Mendes371511113
T. Saltzer10
LSep 14 · 13:00T. Saltzer—66111142Y. Su—111147113LSep 14 · 11:30I. Bertrand1.1881111113T. Saltzer4.15113271LSep 14 · 09:30J. Loffler1.38111011113T. Saltzer2.80512681WSep 14 · 07:30S. Happek2.058111261T. Saltzer1.6811914113LAug 7 · 08:30A. Mino1.3711115113T. Saltzer2.85171181LAug 6 · 17:00K. Fadeev—1211113T. Saltzer—10720LAug 6 · 15:30T. Saltzer—9660K. Zimmermann—1111113WAug 6 · 13:00T. Saltzer—1211113T. Freund—10890LAug 6 · 11:30L. Kraus2.151161110113T. Saltzer1.6351171272WAug 6 · 09:30S. Happek—771161T. Saltzer—11116113
E. Mendes10
LSep 14 · 13:30I. Bertrand1.141011118113E. Mendes5.0012551182LSep 14 · 12:00J. Loffler3.65511711143E. Mendes1.22117118122LSep 14 · 09:00S. Happek8.5011611113E. Mendes1.05711691WSep 14 · 07:00S. Almeida2.10145391E. Mendes1.65121111113WJul 7 · 11:00D. Rinderer1.67119151152E. Mendes2.10711177113WJul 7 · 09:45T. Saltzer3.855116101E. Mendes1.2011711123WJul 7 · 08:30L. Kraus6.5076100E. Mendes1.101111123LJul 6 · 17:00S. Carrillo6.5012111310123E. Mendes1.101491112102WJul 6 · 15:30E. Mendes1.6711811113K. Fadeev2.10711821WJul 6 · 13:00E. Mendes—1111113T. Saltzer—4470
Upcoming Matches
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.