TT Lossbeater/Challenger Series TT
Challenger Series TTMatch #13127629
Played Sep 14Finished
Siddharta Almeida
Home
2.10
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
5–5Last 10Won last 2
Final
1 – 3
Set by set
1412511311911––
Enio Mendes
Away
1.65
At publish
Won last 3Form at publish
8–2Last 10Won last 3
The read, and what happenedsealed at 04:14 and never touched — 56.1% is still 56.1%
Graded at full timeEnio Mendes to win
56.1%
56.1%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Rightnot sent
«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.
How it is going
Point-by-point unavailable
BetsAPI did not publish a timeline for this match.
76 points played in total.
Set by set
1412511311911––
H2H Siddharta Almeida 0–1 Enio Mendes Siddharta Almeida has won 0 of their 1 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 04:14What took a side5 for · 0 against · 1 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.65 (56%)
Mendes
Correct
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
0-1 in 1
—
Too close
1 played, under the floor of 3
Rating (G2)
Almeida 1520 vs Mendes 1898
Mendes
Correct
both rated, 378 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Almeida 60% vs Mendes 80%
Mendes
Correct
20pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Almeida 50% vs Mendes 80%
Mendes
Correct
30pp gap, over the 15pp bar
Streak
Almeida +2 · Mendes +3
Mendes
Correct
one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
5 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 56% — Slight lean (leans Mendes)
Decision Summary
Why this prediction
- Mendes form (80%) outperforms what odds imply (61%)
Market vs Signals
Market oddsAlmeida 2.10 / Mendes 1.65
Signal prob.44% / 56%
Edge (Mendes)+0.0pp
Challenger Series TT · #13127629
Almeida2.10
50%won 5 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As underdog
Fewer than 10 matches in this role
Mendes1.65
80%won 8 of 10 · last 10
Won last 3
oldest → newest60%takes the first set · 6 of 10
As favourite84% won 21 of 25
Up 2–0, closes it100% 11 of 11
Up 1–0, closes it88% 15 of 17
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 1 meeting
HomeAlmeida0wins
AwayMendes1wins
Mendes leads 1–0.
First set to match win · in this matchup
Not enough first sets
Neither side has won the first set three times here, so there is no rate to publish.
Set by set, in this 1 meetingevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S2
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S3
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
S4
Only 1 match reached it — below the 3 needed to publish a rate
How that 1 finishedn = 1, below the 3 needed
3–0Straight, home0
3–1Four sets, home0
3–2Decider, home0
2–3Decider, away0
1–3Four sets, away1
0–3Straight, away0
This 1 meeting
MetricAlmeidaMendesA − MBasisWins01−1in 1 meetingFirst set10+1of 1Avg pointsper match31.045.0−14.0per matchSweeps0003–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricAlmeidaMendesBasisWin rate · lifetime12 / 23 vs 40 / 5252.2%76.9%12 / 23 vs 40 / 52Avg sets wonper match2.12.5per matchAvg pointsper match38.037.8per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
MendesAlmeida 2.10/Mendes 1.65
Read onlywould have hit
What we said
56%
Mendes · sealed before the serve
What happened
1–3
Mendes won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record1
LSep 14 · 07:00S. Almeida31145391E. Mendes45121111113
S. Almeida10
WSep 8 · 08:00M. Stefanidis—61113762S. Almeida—1151111113WSep 8 · 07:00S. Almeida1.7511911113C. Schmitt1.95911861LSep 7 · 15:30V. Senkbeil—116114113S. Almeida—61171162LSep 7 · 13:30K. Fadeev—15211113S. Almeida—1311481WSep 7 · 12:00K. Waltl—91080S. Almeida—1112113LSep 7 · 09:00M. Henninger1.221111113S. Almeida3.703640LSep 7 · 07:00R. Turrini1.321111143S. Almeida2.9554120LSep 1 · 08:30S. Almeida—119111172K. Zimmermann—131199113WSep 1 · 06:30S. Almeida—1111113S. Amann—9630WAug 31 · 16:00S. Almeida—981111113M. Gremillion—11116882
E. Mendes10
WJul 7 · 11:00D. Rinderer1.67119151152E. Mendes2.10711177113WJul 7 · 09:45T. Saltzer3.855116101E. Mendes1.2011711123WJul 7 · 08:30L. Kraus6.5076100E. Mendes1.101111123LJul 6 · 17:00S. Carrillo6.5012111310123E. Mendes1.101491112102WJul 6 · 15:30E. Mendes1.6711811113K. Fadeev2.10711821WJul 6 · 13:00E. Mendes—1111113T. Saltzer—4470WJul 6 · 11:30S. Happek7.005580E. Mendes1.081111113WJul 6 · 09:30C. Schmitt10.5011196872E. Mendes1.028171111113LJul 6 · 07:30D. Rinderer1.731111113E. Mendes2.009990WJun 9 · 11:10K. Walter4.50841171E. Mendes1.1711118113
Upcoming Matches
S. Almeida
E. Mendes
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.