TT Lossbeater/Czech Liga Pro
Czech Liga ProMatch #13115172
Played Sep 12Finished
Michal Blaha
Home
1.80
At publish
Lost last 1Form at publish
7–3Last 10Lost last 1
Final
0 – 3
Set by set
9111012811––––
Radek Adamczyk
Away
1.91
At publish
Won last 2Form at publish
7–3Last 10Won last 2
The read, and what happenedsealed at 13:33 and never touched — 54.0% is still 54.0%
Graded at full timeMichal Blaha to win
54.0%
54.0%
Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.
Read
Wrongnot sent
How it is goingMichal Blaha above · Radek Adamczyk below
Set 1 · 9-11
Set 2 · 10-12
Set 3 · 8-10
Point 60 set 3, 8-10 — our read held Michal Blaha at 54.0%
60 points drawn · the score is 1 ahead; the rest land in a moment.
H2H Michal Blaha 8–6 Radek Adamczyk Radek Adamczyk has won 6 of their 14 meetings.
The pickNothing sent
Sealed 13:33What took a side2 for · 1 against · 3 silent
SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way
Market
1.80 (51%)
Blaha
Wrong
no bar to clear — a priced side always votes
H2H
8-6 in 14
Blaha
Wrong
gap of 2 in 14, over the gap of 2
Rating (G2)
Blaha 1194 vs Adamczyk 1263
Adamczyk
Correct
both rated, 68 points apart — no bar to clear
Form (L5)
Blaha 60% vs Adamczyk 60%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Form (L10)
Blaha 70% vs Adamczyk 70%
—
Too close
0pp gap, under the 15pp bar
Streak
Blaha -1 · Adamczyk +2
—
Too close
neither holds a run of 3 on their own
Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.
This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.
2 for, 3 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.
Signal confidence: 54% — Coin-flip (leans Blaha)
Decision Summary
Market vs Signals
Market oddsBlaha 1.80 / Adamczyk 1.91
Signal prob.54% / 46%
Edge (Blaha)+2.5pp
Czech Liga Pro · #13115172
Blaha1.80
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
oldest → newest
40%takes the first set · 4 of 10
As favourite69% won 31 of 45
Up 2–0, closes it82% 14 of 17
Up 1–0, closes it87% 20 of 23
Adamczyk1.91
70%won 7 of 10 · last 10
Won last 2
oldest → newest70%takes the first set · 7 of 10
As underdog48% won 19 of 40
Down 0–1, comes back33% 8 of 24
Down 0–2, comes back25% 3 of 12
Head to head
H2H window
The recordacross 10 meetings
HomeBlaha6wins
AwayAdamczyk4wins
5 of 10 to a deciderBlaha leads 6–4, and 5 of those 10 went to a fifth set.
First set to match win · in this matchup
HomeBlaha80%4 of 5
AwayAdamczyk60%3 of 5
Set by set, in these 10 meetingsevery set carries its own n — a fifth set only exists when the match reaches one
S1Blaha5Adamczyk5n = 10split evenly
S2Blaha6Adamczyk4n = 10Blaha took 6 of 10
S3Blaha5Adamczyk5n = 10split evenly
S4Blaha4Adamczyk4n = 8split evenly
S5Blaha3Adamczyk2n = 5Blaha took 3 of 5
How those 10 finishedcounts, and the six add up to 10 — a scoreline is a name, not a code
3–0Straight, home110%
3–1Four sets, home220%
3–2Decider, home330%
2–3Decider, away220%
1–3Four sets, away110%
0–3Straight, away110%
These 10 meetings
MetricBlahaAdamczykB − ABasisWins64+2in 10 meetingsFirst set550of 10Avg pointsper match43.541.5+2.0per matchSweeps1103–0 or 0–3
Career, not this matchup
MetricBlahaAdamczykBasisWin rate · lifetime97 / 190 vs 41 / 8251.1%50%97 / 190 vs 41 / 82Avg sets wonper match2.02.1per matchAvg pointsper match38.038.7per match
Deep Dive by Market
Each market builds on the overview aboveForecast
History
Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction
Match Winner
BlahaBlaha 1.80/Adamczyk 1.91
Read onlywould have missed
What we said
54%
Blaha · sealed before the serve
What happened
0–3
Adamczyk won
Recent Results
H2H · no odds on record10
WAug 22 · 21:04M. Blaha4211128113R. Adamczyk349101141
LAug 22 · 20:30M. Blaha4571111792R. Adamczyk46116711113
WAug 4 · 20:30M. Blaha351212113R. Adamczyk26101060
WAug 1 · 08:58M. Blaha50811126133R. Adamczyk481151011112
LAug 1 · 07:00M. Blaha401411691R. Adamczyk4616811113
LJul 26 · 13:29M. Blaha501111115122R. Adamczyk55891311143
WJul 26 · 12:00M. Blaha48119611113R. Adamczyk4051111942
WJul 5 · 20:58M. Blaha4211911113R. Adamczyk32811941
LJul 5 · 20:30M. Blaha28121060R. Adamczyk371412113
WJun 20 · 20:30M. Blaha551391111113R. Adamczyk5115119972
M. Blaha10
LSep 12 · 15:30Z. Luksa2.3871112113M. Blaha1.531191071WSep 12 · 14:00M. Blaha1.361511113I. Kolenciak3.0013730WAug 29 · 21:30A. Kanak2.501176111M. Blaha1.4071111133WAug 29 · 20:00M. Blaha2.00671111113D. Vavrecka1.7311116462LAug 29 · 19:30A. Kanak3.0011114113M. Blaha1.36951171WAug 29 · 18:00M. Blaha1.441111113M. Stolba2.636530WAug 27 · 13:02M. Blaha1.8011116113M. Stolba1.91651171WAug 27 · 12:00M. Blaha1.83911119113Z. Luksa1.8311971192LAug 27 · 11:30D. Vavrecka1.6711116113M. Blaha2.10981191WAug 27 · 10:00M. Blaha1.67711911133M. Stolba2.10117117112
R. Adamczyk10
WSep 12 · 15:00I. Kolenciak3.40691161R. Adamczyk1.3011116113WSep 12 · 14:30R. Adamczyk1.671111113Z. Luksa2.108980LAug 22 · 21:04R. Adamczyk1.919101141M. Blaha1.8011128113WAug 22 · 20:30R. Adamczyk2.00116711113M. Blaha1.7371111792LAug 22 · 19:00R. Adamczyk2.75131181152V. Kocian1.40159119113LAug 22 · 18:00D. Tyn1.501111113R. Adamczyk2.504350WAug 10 · 09:30R. Adamczyk1.7311911113D. Vavrecka2.00211641WAug 10 · 08:00D. Vavrecka1.61661141R. Adamczyk2.2011119113WAug 10 · 07:00Z. Luksa1.80541261R. Adamczyk1.91111110113WAug 10 · 06:30R. Adamczyk1.251111113J. Toth3.759640
Event Chatroom
This room is closed. Messages clear 24 hours after they are sent.