Krystian Gudzik vs Dariusz Maszczynski 3-0

TT Lossbeater/TT Elite Series

TT Elite SeriesMatch #13114892

Played Sep 12Finished

Krystian Gudzik

Home

1.33

At publish

Won last 1

Form at publish

6–4Last 10Won last 1

Final

3 – 0

Set by set

11413111412––––

Dariusz Maszczynski

Away

3.25

At publish

Lost last 6

Form at publish

2–8Last 10Lost last 6

The read, and what happenedsealed at 12:33 and never touched — 73.3% is still 73.3%

Graded at full time

Krystian Gudzik to win

73.3%

Sealed before the first serve and never touched. The record is only checkable because of that.

Read

Right

not sent

«Right» is not «we won». No pick was shipped, so this is a read that turned out correct — not a call that won.

How it is goingKrystian Gudzik above · Dariusz Maszczynski below

Set 1 · 11-4

Set 2 · 13-11

Set 3 · 14-12

Point 65 set 3, 14-12 — our read held Krystian Gudzik at 73.3%

65 points played in total.

The pickNothing sent

Sealed 12:33

What took a side4 for · 1 against · 1 silent

SignalWhat it readSideVerdictWhy it voted that way

Market

1.33 (71%)

Gudzik

Correct

no bar to clear — a priced side always votes

H2H

No meetings

—

No value

they have never met

Rating (G2)

Gudzik 1429 vs Maszczynski 1196

Gudzik

Correct

both rated, 233 points apart — no bar to clear

Form (L5)

Gudzik 60% vs Maszczynski 0%

Gudzik

Correct

60pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Form (L10)

Gudzik 60% vs Maszczynski 20%

Gudzik

Correct

40pp gap, over the 15pp bar

Streak

Gudzik +1 · Maszczynski -5

Maszczynski

Wrong

one crossed 3 in a row, the other did not

Not whether we were right, but which read failed. One match proves nothing — the calibration is the aggregate of rows like these, and that aggregate does not exist yet.

This table lists the interface catalogue — the one you already see in ALIGN / CONFLICT. The engine weighs its own subset, and they are not the same set. It says so here instead of hiding it.

4 for, 1 silent — and still no pick. The gate cuts it all the same.

Signal confidence: 74% — Strong (leans Gudzik)

Decision Summary

Why this prediction

Maszczynski form (0%) is below what odds imply (31%)

Market vs Signals

Market oddsGudzik 1.33 / Maszczynski 3.25

Signal prob.74% / 26%

Edge (Gudzik)+2.8pp

TT Elite Series · #13114892

Gudzik1.33

60%won 6 of 10 · last 10

oldest → newest

30%takes the first set · 3 of 10

As favourite67% won 36 of 54

Up 2–0, closes it100% 18 of 18

Up 1–0, closes it88% 28 of 32

Maszczynski3.25

20%won 2 of 10 · last 10

Lost last 6

oldest → newest

30%takes the first set · 3 of 10

As underdog24% won 66 of 274

Down 0–1, comes back12% 22 of 187

Down 0–2, comes back1% 1 of 123

Head to head

H2H window

First meeting

These two have never played each other. It is not a loading failure: there is no history. The career card below still stands — it is the only comparison available.

Career, not this matchup

MetricGudzikMaszczynskiBasisWin rate · lifetime53 / 100 vs 90 / 41253%21.8%53 / 100 vs 90 / 412Avg sets wonper match2.01.3per matchAvg pointsper match36.533.4per match

Deep Dive by Market

Each market builds on the overview above

Forecast

History

Forecastthe model predicts this marketHistorythis is what the H2H did — no prediction

Match Winner

Gudzik

Gudzik 1.33/Maszczynski 3.25

Read onlywould have hit

What we said

73.7%

Gudzik · sealed before the serve

What happened

3–0

Gudzik won

Total sets · Score

These two have never met.

The three history tabs read the same head-to-head record, so they go down together — one message, not three empty cards. The three forecast tabs are unaffected and stay open.

Recent Results

K. Gudzik10